The Voice of the White House
Washington, D.C. June 16, 2014: “An interesting bit of input.
The US has developed a methodology whereby a plane can be taken off a radar screen. Also, there is the methodology for actually controlling the aircraft in-flight.
Who has done this?
Our DoD has done this and recently did some experimenting with it in Europe and got caught.
They tried it out earlier on that Malaysian plane that suddenly vanished because the US has extensive satellite, and other, controls in that immediate area (because of the PRC)
The actual goal is to be able to send a hidden drone crashing into Vladimir Putin’s plane without getting the blame.
The second would be to nail Edward Snowden.
Both of these individuals are hated by Obama who is determined to get rid of one, or better, both of them but without any blame attached.
I do not understand the technology involved and it is too prolix to fish it out and send it on but my source(s) on this are impeccable.
And on the other side, where facts are irrevelant, we have such bizarre stories bespangling the Internet as this classic psycho-babble about the 9/11 attacks:
International Citizens’ Inquiry Into 9/11 – Toronto, Canada, 2004
Updated list of speakers
There’s an updated list of speakers for the conference up now at the www.911inquiry.org web site.
Among invited and confirmed presenters are:
-Michael C. Ruppert, (journalist/author) From The Wilderness.
-Thierry Meyssan, author – 9/11: The Big Lie; The Frightening Fraud; Pentagate.
-Professor Walter Davis, September 11th and the Bush Administration: Compelling Evidence for Complicity.
-Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics University of Ottawa, Author – War and Globalization, The Truth Behind September 11; The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order.
-Carol Brouillet, 9/11 activist/organizer International Inquiry Into 9/11, Phase 1.
-Thomas K. Kimmel Jr., former naval officer, retired FBI agent, and grandson of Admiral Husband E. Kimmel—the scapegoated Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Attacks compared.
I think it is obvious that mini nukes were used to bring down the three WTC towers. There were no planes crashing into anything. What millions watched was a TV show. The real planes were highjacked electronically, flown out over the Atlantic and detonated. No fuss, no muss. The Pentagon was hit by a shaped charge that was set up inside the area that was vacant and being renovated. The entire operation was conducted by the White House with elements in the CIA and the U.S. military with help from the Israelis (who imagine they are going to take over the world). Maybe they will. The lesson for all of us is these people need to be put out of business, right now, today. It is straight jackets in padded cells for them, or really bad things are going to happen to all of us.
The Americans were scammed into believing that mini nukes were planted in WTC1 and 2 on 9/11 because the Pentagon was hit by a missile carrying a nuclear warhead which did not explode. I’m not even sure whether there were any planes hitting the WTC – the TV coverage would appear to be a complete computer fabrication
As a result, the Americans demolished WTC1 and 2 as the mini nukes would cause less destruction if the explosions were at ground level rather than high up in the skyscrapers.
The nukes which were to be used for the demolition of the WTC complex were stored under WTC 7. Building 7 had to be destroyed so nobody would find the underground railway system used for delivering the nukes to WTC 1 and 2.
But we know now, and scientists have proven it, that the alleged planes were augmented by Tesla Energy Rays beamed at the buildings from a secret site located in New Jersey and controlled by units of the Hidden Hand, led by the notorious Dr. Melbourne Fong….
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at firstname.lastname@example.org Continue Reading »