|
Though
scholars have not paid a great deal of attention to Adolf Hitler's
systematic bribery of his senior military officers during World
War II, the fact that secret payments existed is not news. Top
ranking officers received monthly tax-exempt supplements to their
salaries which more than doubled their amounts. In 1941 and 1942,
certain officers also received tax-exempt checks of RM 250,000 for
milestone birthdays (55th, 60th, 65th ), and in 1944 a small group
of officers were given tremendous landed estates, some valued at
over RM 1 million, also with no tax liability. The base
materialism of these practices appealed to historians in the DDR
and the secrecy of these practices has appealed to journalists as
recently as this year. Meanwhile, the importance of corruption in
the context of Hitler's war and the virtual absence of resistance
in the top ranks has brought leading historians to call for
further investigation.Yet
a systematic analysis of the practice has been missing, perhaps
for two reasons. In the first place, the source material is
sparse. A few files in the Bundesarchiv together with
occasional diary entries are all that document Hitler's cash gifts
to his senior officers. Secondly, the study of modem corruption
has a slippery nature due to the many things that are left
unspoken (and unwritten) between the participants in corrupt
transactions. This problem, of course, is not intrinsic to Nazi
Germany alone.
Nonetheless, certain conclusions can be drawn from the
available evidence. In my twenty minutes today I will focus on the
basic plank - Hitler's monthly cash supplements to senior
officers. Unlike large birthday checks and landed estates, which a
relative few received, all senior officers received these
supplements, which lasted until the end of the war. During and
after the war there was a tendency among recipients, their
relatives, and more recently their biographers to speak of cash
gifts - if at all - in soft tones. Thus the money could appear not
as a bribe, but as a legitimate part of one's salary.
Perhaps this tendency is symptomatic of the human conscience in
uncomfortable situations in which those things left unsaid leave
room for benign interpretations of one's behavior. It is my
contention though, that even at the time there was no room for
such interpretations. Any inclination by recipients to view the
monthly supplement as anything but a bribe for loyal behavior -
and a huge one at that - required a routine of mental gymnastics
more daring than those usually performed in the course of corrupt
practices.
Certainly Hitler understood what the generous flow of
money and tax exemptions was to purchase. The deep suspicions that
he had held of the military hierarchy before the removals of War
Minister Werner von Blomberg and Amy Commander-in-Chief Werner von
Fritsch in 1938 remained afterwards. Whatever the Wehrmacht
command's affinity for the Nazi conception of Volksgemeinschaft,
whatever the extent to which the Ostheer would truly become
'Hitler's Army" in the years ahead with its willingness to
condone or participate in murderous excesses,
it is clear from Hitler's statements that he maintained profound
distrust of the senior command throughout the war. Part of the
suspicion concerned the reluctance of conservative, largely
aristocratic, largely Prussian officers to accept blindly the
operational decisions of a man to whom Field Marshall Gerd von
Rundstedt referred in 1944 as 'the bohemian corporal.'
Even after the removal or forced retirement of suspect officers in
1938, Hitler complained that the Wehrmacht command lacked
the elan of the Nazi political leadership "because they still
do not understand the new era,
and he said that he would have preferred to hand control of the
Army - the “most insecure element of the state" - to his
more politically oriented Gauleiter, who had the spirit
that the Army leadership lacked.
Part of the suspicion also concerned the possible reluctance of
senior officers to condone wholesale atrocities in the occupied
territories. The example of Generaloberst Johannes
Blaskowitz, an officer with a higher moral conscience than most,
is poignant here. On 16 November 1939 as the new military
commander in occupied Poland, Blaskowitz submitted to Army
Commander-in-Chief Walther von Brauchitsch the first of his
official protests concerning police atrocities. Hitler's response
on seeing the report was choleric. Assuming that Blaskowitz's
problems were common in the Army command, the Fuhrer ridiculed the
latter's "childish mentality" and sneered that 'one
cannot conduct a war with Salvation Army methods.
The question was what to do about
problems such as these, especially with larger projects than
Poland on the horizon. Though he wistfully dreamed of purging the
officer corps and filling it with younger, more Nazi oriented
leaders.
Hitler viewed purges in the Stalinist style as a risk to the
army's professional competence.
Even bloodless coups such as the Blomberg-Fritsch affair contained
the problem of finding successors suitable both to Hitler and to
military subordinates. The discovery of a respected officer with
the character of von Brauchitsch, who without asking too many
questions had accepted von Fritsch's office in 1938 (along with
certain payments of his own), had not been easy.
The practical solution, especially in wartime, was to use the
tools he had despite his suspicions. Hitler could accept that his
Generals would not be good Nazis or that they might not care for
his operational decisions, but he had to have their unquestioned
obedience. It is in this context that the systematic practice of
bribery of senior officers, which began in the summer of 1940,
must be understood.
The basic form of financial corruption would consist
of monthly tax-exempt payments into the bank accounts of Field
Marshals and Grand Admirals, who would receive 4,000 Reichsmarks
(RM) per month, and Generalobersten and General
Admirals, who would receive RM 2,000 per month. These sums
would be paid in addition to regular salaries and normal wartime
supplements. Politely known as an Aufwandsentschädigung
(compensation for expenses) the payment would come from a special
account known as Konto 5 - part of a much larger and
seemingly bottomless Chancellery discretionary fund, which itself
ballooned from RM 150,000 in 1933 to RM 40 million by the end of
the war.
The fund was administered through the Reich Chancellery by its
Chief, Dr. Hans-Heinrich Lammers, without the customary
supervision of the Reich Finance Ministry over fiscal year
budgeting. Thus Lammers and his staff withdrew money from
discretionary funds in accordance with Hitler’s criteria and
answered to Hitler alone.
Interestingly, top-ranking civilian leaders had
already been receiving such supplements since April 1936;
Reich Ministers pocketed RM 4,000 per month and State Secretaries
RM 2,000 in addition to their regular salaries. Since October
1937, Reichstag deputies had received a monthly RM 600 and
deputies of the Prussian Staatsrat RM 500 per month as a
special tax-exempt supplement as well, a figure which was deducted
from the larger amounts if an official were eligible for more than
one form of payment.
In spite of these general guidelines, exact amounts were left in
some ways to Lammers's discretion. Thus Lammers paid himself an Aufwandsentschädigung
of RM 8,000 per month (with no deductions) while Propaganda
Minister Joseph Goebbels received RM 7,400 per month.
Leaving aside for now the implications of every senior official
and parliamentary deputy helping himself to part of the state
treasury each month with the approval of the Fuhrer himself, the
interesting issue here is that Hitler did not include Germany's
military leaders for several more years. Perhaps these supplements
were a form of party cronyism to which suspect military officers
were simply not invited.
This exclusion vanished after the victory against
France, less as a reward for a campaign brilliantly won than as a
bribe for the campaign that was to come. On 31 July 1940 Hitler
would announce to his supreme command and service chiefs that
Germany would annihilate the Soviet Union the following spring.
The war in the East would bring issues over which Hitler surely
expected friction from some senior officers both in the context of
operational planning and in the context of the murderous nature of
the coming Weltanschauungskrieg. His concern over what
Naval Commander-in-Chief Grand Admiral Erich Raeder - a man
accustomed to speaking his mind to Hitler on strategic matters
-would say about a massive commitment in the East with Great
Britain still unbeaten, might have prompted Hitler to wait with
this announcement until Raeder had left the room.
It also might have helped to prompt a tax-free birthday gift of RM
250,000 the following April - the first such bequest to a military
officer -which Raeder happily accepted.
Yet concerns regarding protests from senior officers over a war of
human annihilation were certainly real as well, and with the
stakes higher in the approaching war with the Soviet Union, it is
not surprising that Hitler would have wished to send clear
messages to his senior command concerning incentives even before
that campaign was announced.
In any event, Hitler would shower financial largesse
on all senior officers beginning in July 1940. Hitler's public
promotion of 12 Generaobersten to the rank of General Field
Marshall on the 19th was followed three days later with private
comments concerning the extension of the Aufwandsentschädigung
to the military. The comment, recorded in the diary of
Hitler's army adjutant, Major Gerhard Engel, reads as follows:
(The Führer) talks about (the)
promotions resulting from the French campaign and comes to talk
about the honors (Ehrungen) that he has [given to1 the
highest Wehrnacht generals. He did this consciously and
with intent, and he has also learned from history here. In
antiquity also, kings and emperors made large gifts to those who
had done them some great service, and Prussian kings too were very
generous in this respect. That was a very clever business, for the
more one honors a heroic deed or achievement, the more one is
obliged . . . completely irrespective of his outlook. . , to the
one to whom he is indebted for this honor (Ehrung). . .
Thus (the Führer) will also attach to promotions to the
ranks of Generalfeldmarschall and Generaloberst a
tax-free financial honor (Ehrung), which - he still will speak to Reichsminister
Lammers (about this) - shall amount to RM 4,000 monthly with
(the rank of ) Field Marshall, and with (the rank of) Generaloberst
RM 2,000. When the war is finally won he will also not be
tight- fisted in the distribution of land. Many noble estates
originated in this way and even Frederick the Great was very
generous in this respect. (The Führer) does not demand
from a general that he be a National Socialist, but he does demand
... that politically, he submit completely to the state leadership
and blindly execute orders that the state leadership desires. This
will be easier for each, even against inner conviction, if he has
received corresponding honors (Ehrungen) from the chief of
state and through this must feel himself automatically bound. . .
.
Such payments began as per a Hitler order of 8 August
1940 with the addendum that newly-promoted Reichsmarschall
Hermann Göring received RM 20,000 per month rather than a Field
Marshal's share of RM 4,000.
It was immediately made very clear to the recipients what the
money was for. Less than a week after this order, the Führer hosted
a private ceremony in which he presented his new Marshals with
their batons, which were themselves purchased through Hitler’s
discretionary funds at the cost of RM 72,000
Hitler took pains to mention while presenting these expensive
gifts the importance he placed on blind loyally in the military
command. As a new General Field Marshal Fedor von Bock noted in
his diary,
The Führer (presented) us (with)
the Field Marshals' batons in the Reich Chancellery. He
emphasize(d) how necessary the unity of the German people (is)-
also in the future - and how absolutely necessary it is that the Wehrmacht
to declare itself completely for National Socialist thought.
Conspicuously absent from this ceremony was
Blaskowitz, whose repeated complaints had earned him a warning
from von Brauchitsch in February, reassignment in May, and the
distinction of being the only Generaloberst not promoted to
Generalfeldmarschall in July.Good
behavior would be rewarded. Friction could result in not only
career stagnation, but also in a lesser share of the plums.
Senior officers who received the supplement seem to
have told themselves that this was a legitimate payment which,
after all, every Field Marshal or Generaloberst received.
Frau Lucie-Maria Rommel made the distinction after the war between
the illegitimacy of the larger gifts that some Field Marshals
(excluding her husband) accepted and the monthly payments which
all Field Marshals (including her husband) received. Even
in April 1944 Luftwaffe Field Marshal Wolfram von
Richthofen - then the commander of the Second Air Fleet in Italy -
commented when referring to his tax-free RM 4,000 per month bonus
that, 'I am assuming that this sum first and foremost is to make
possible an outward appearance which corresponds to rank.' Yet
such logic is very strained. There
could have been no doubt that this money lay beyond the pale of
usual military pay.
In the first place there was the precarious and
insecure nature of the payments themselves, which was well-known
to all. On reaching the rank of Generaloberst or Generalfeldmarschall,
an officer would receive a secret correspondence from Lammers
which informed the former of his new-found, tax-exempt fortune.
For reasons which shall be seen, there is no documentation
concerning the reaction of the recipients, but we can assume that
in most cases this news was accepted with a certain satisfaction,
such as that exhibited by General Erwin Rommel on learning of his
substantial book royalties while in North Africa, or that recorded
by Field Marshall Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on the outskirts of
Leningrad in September 1941 when enthusiastically thanking Lammers
for the “günstige Mitteilung" concerning his RM
250,000 birthday checkIn
any event, the prewar incident in which von Fritsch refused Hitler’s
seemingly more. priceless gift of a gold Nazi party badge was not
repeated when the stakes became materially more lucrative.
We can also assume (though this is not documented) that after the
passage of many months, the concern that such money could suddenly
be cut off would provoke emotions that were every bit as strong.
Indeed, Lammers took special care to emphasize to recipients that
this particular money came from the Fuhrer's discretionary funds
rather than the military budget, and that it was "jederzeit
widerruflich" Meanwhile, he remained ominously vague
concerning the criteria that would be applied to the future
payment of funds. Recipients were told:
Whether and in what amount one can expect
further Aufwandsentschädigungen . . .remains reserved for
my decision for47achl individual case, based on the authorization
given to me by the Fuhrer.
An agreement reached in later March 1943 between
Lammers and the Chief of the Supreme Command, Field Marshall
Wilhelm Keitel, stipulated that reassignment to the Fuhrer reserve
would not precipitate a halt in payments, but that dismissal or
retirement would. The
death of a recipient would be followed by three months' worth of
payments to the widow; if there were none, then payments would
cease.
For the rest, recipients learned that payments depended on good
behavior. Transfers to the bank account of Field Marshal Friedrich
von Paulus stopped in April 1943, not due to his capture by the
Soviets at Stalingrad, which had taken place two months earlier,
but rather due to his statements in captivity which blamed Hitler
for the destruction of 6thArmy.
Field Marshall Erwin von Witzleben's flow of secret cash was
naturally halted in connection with his role in the 20 July 1944
plot, with certain moneys demanded back from his surviving family
after he was stripped of his rank and hanged. Payments for Field
Marshals Erwin Rommel and Günther von Kluge, as well as to Generalobersten
Franz Halder and Friederich Fromm, were all stopped due to their
foreknowledge of the plot.
This principle could be taken to extremes under even less serious
circumstances. General Admiral Wilhelm Marschall, who had
commanded the western naval theater of operations, had been
removed from duty on 30 June 1943. He was reinstated on 4 June
1944, but due to clerical error he had continued to receive his RM
2,000 monthly bonus. On discovering the mistake, Lammers's
subordinates in the Reich Chancellery insisted that Marschall owed
them eleven months' worth of payments, or RM 22,000
Lammers also distinguished these payments from normal
supplements in another way. Unlike other forms of compensation,
the amounts of which were published in the Reichsgesetzblatt,
the Aufwandsentschädigung was to be kept absolutely
secret. "Written correspondence in this matter, which is to
be handled confidentially," he told Ferdinand Schörner on
his promotion to Generaloberst,
should in principle not occur. In case -
by way of exception - it becomes unavoidable, correspondence is to
be directed only to me, with the clearly visible marking on the
envelope, 'Eigenhändig!"
Lammers's preferred method was to inform new
recipients in person, after which the latter would discreetly
provide Lammers with a bank account number in which to deposit the
funds and would sign their name to a statement that they
understood all of the terms; in the case of military figures,
however, Lammers often had to inform them by written
correspondence. Even so, recipients still signed and return a
short, pre-written statement confirming their earnest
understanding of all the rules. No other form of monetary
compensation contained this sort of insecurity, secrecy, or
solemnity.
The upshot was that everyone followed the rules, and
those few who raised questions with Lammers did so with deference
to the delicacy of it all. 'I am making reference," said von
Richthofen when asking about the possibility of receiving a
portion of his payments in Lire, 'to our very confidential and
personal..written correspondence concerning the special monthly
money transfer from the Führer to me as a Field Marshal ...
The discreet nature of the practice is also made clear by the fact
that as late as March 1943, Martin Bormann, Head of the Party
Chancellery and soon to be Hitlef s Secretary, remained unfamiliar
with it. Yet
the clearest testimonial to the practice's secrecy came from
Hitler’ s Naval Adjutant, Rear Admiral Karl Jesko von Puttkamer,
who had spent the entire war in Führer Headquarters, and
yet had only a vague picture of the payments as late as the fall
of 1944. Military adjutants themselves received secret payments
from Konto 5 - albeit much smaller ones.
In November 1944, Puttkamer asked Chancellery officials which
officers were receiving the Aufwandsentschädigung as well
as the amounts in question. The reason for the query, he said, was
related to recent personnel changes, but it is likely that
Puttkamer was curious what his fellow adjutants were receiving. 'I
need this data," he said, "in order to be able to form a
picture for myself [as to] whether this affair is presently in
order."
Chancellery officials provided Puttkamer with a list of senior
officers, since, as they acknowledged, Puttkamer already knew that
they were receiving such payments. Staff officers’ names were
not to be provided, in order to avoid widening the circle of
recipients. As for monetary amounts, Chancellery officials decided
that it was ’...out of the question to report the amounts of
these Aufwandsentschädigungen to the Rear Admiral.’ It
had been a rule ever since payments to officers were begun in
1940, that the entire issue of Konto 5 was to be handled
with the utmost discretion.
Puttkamer thus received only list of senior officers, but
lower-ranking adjutants were left off the list, as were all money
amounts
The cash rewards, aside from being secret and
dependent on behavior, were also simply too substantial to have
been seriously viewed as legitimate. Even without them, senior
officers were exceptionally well-paid. In mid-1940, General Field
Marshals and Grand Admirals such as Keitel, von Brauchitsch, and
Raeder made RM 26,500 per year, while Generalobersten and General
Admirals made RM 24,000. In contrast, an Army Major made a
mere RM 8,400 per annum while a staff sergeant could expect RM
2,838 at most. In addition, General Field Marshals and Generalobersten
already received a tax-exempt wartime supplement (Wehrsold)
of RM 300 and RM 270 per month respectively (staff sergeants
received RM 60 per month), and a law of 1943 awarded General Field
Marshals a Diensfaufwandentschädigung of RM 400 per month
from the Reich Household. More supplements were granted for
housing depending on rank, the locality in which one was
stationed, and number of children. All of this means that with
supplements, a Field Marshal could expect to receive RM 34,950 per
year in publicly accountable funds before adding in supplements
for housing, clothing, food, medical care, and so forth.
By granting the secret supplement from Konto 5, then,
Hitler was adding for General Field Marshals a tax-free supplement
48,000 marks per year (RM 24,000 for Generalobersten). When
one considers that the Konto 5 supplement was free of any
income-tax liability, which after 1939 could have reached a
maximum of 65% on yearly incomes over RM 2,400, one can see easily
that the secret supplement far more than doubled what was an
extremely high salary for Germany's top ranking officers To
make a sugary deal even sweeter, the deposits for July, August,
and September of each year were made in a single tax-exempt lump
sum of RM 12,000 or RM 6,000 at the beginning of each July.
In contrast, those infantry soldiers who drew the unenviable duty
of searching for land mines earned the considerably smaller pay
supplement of a single mark per day.
The Aufwandsentschadigung was maintained throughout
the war for all top officials not sullied by the events of 20 July
1944. Until the end, Lammers regarded it as an untouchable part of
the overall budget, while recipients viewed it as a key part of
their income, worth protecting especially with the war so
obviously lost. In preparing the yearly budget in January 1945,
the Reich Finance Ministry projected an especially dim year with
higher expenses (which included caring for war-wounded as well as
those who had lost their homes) and declining revenues.
Yet the suggestion from within the Reich Finance Ministry that the
Führer's discretionary fund be cut met with a very cool
reception from Lammers, because, as he said when referring to the
fund, "[A] substantial reduction of requirements for fiscal
year 1945 [is] hardly to be expected."
Mean- while, as the ring closed around Germany in February, March,
and April, and as thousands of troops were being shot for
desertion, those officers who had had their monthly payments
deposited into banks which were located in the immediate path of
the enemy quickly arranged to have their deposits shifted to
accounts in what they hoped would be in safer locales. These
included General Field Marshals Georg von Kuchler, Wilhelm List,
Erich von Manstein, Maximilian von Weichs, and even the wife of Generaloberst
Hansjürgen von Amim, who in March 1945, with her husband in
American captivity, still moved his account of deposit from
Breslau to Saxony.
Deposit arrangements were changed immediately for all who
requested the service, and the final payment, deposited by
Lammers's staff in May 1945, was double the usual monthly amount -
a gesture designed either to encourage a fight to the very end or
to raid the cookie jar one last time.
During and after the war, those senior officers who never
received birthday checks or landed estates were fond of professing
outrage at those who had received such gifts from Hitler. After
the disaster at Stalingrad, Field Marshal Fedor von Bock recorded
in his diary a rumor from Hitler’s headquarters that the Fuhrer
was paying "hush money' in sums of RM 250,000, and noted with
some indignation that the rumor included him as a recipient.Generaloberst
Heinz Guderian, who received the most expensive landed estate that
Hitler granted (RM 1.25 million), deservedly drew special outrage
from those officers familiar with the shady circumstances by which
it was acquired.
Manstein's face is said to have 'twitched once or twice" when
hearing of these circumstances.
Yet no Field Marshall and no Generaloberst refused Hitler’s
money in smaller, though still very substantial amounts. The fact
that a few received much larger gifts does not eliminate the
clearly evident, dubious character of the tax-exempt Aufwandsentschädigung
or the corrupting influence which it surely had with those of
lesser character than von Witzleben. Though one will never be able
to measure the exact degree by which any given individual was
affected by Hitler’s monthly supplements, the uncomfortable
silence of Generaloberst Franz Halder at Nuremberg when
confronted with the following argument spoke volumes. "I
think it is material," said US. Deputy Chief Council James
McHaney in 1948, "that.. .Field marshals accepted personally
large sums of money from Hitler. I think this acceptance of money
over and above their salary, their military pay, is of some
significance with regard to the question of their personally
following Hitler’s policies."
|