|
International
Israeli Internet Spying & Fraud
April
4, 2006
by Michael Bagley, Financial Editor
For
the past five years, there have been growing fears that somehow,
outsiders have been able to penetrate into the confidential computer
files of government agencies, business entities such as banks and
defense contractors and individuals.
Some
of this appeared to be an attempt to obtain highly classified
information that could be of use to others and in other instances,
attempts to get into the personal, and corporate, bank accounts of
individuals and corporations.
This
is a brief study of some of the salient aspects of this problem of
computer theft and espionage and we will start with the discovery of
massive computer penetration in Israel. We will then consider
further penetrations of American business and intelligence computer
systems by agents of a foreign government as opposed to confidence
men and then conclude with the use of the same methods to commit
frauds on the gullible in the United States and elsewhere.
Some
of the first public notice of this problem surfaced first in Israel
in 2004 when Israeli law
enforcement cyber crime experts discovered that what is known as a
Trojan Horse (illicit spyware planted on an unsuspecting computer)
had been inserted into about 60 major Israeli businesses. Isreali
law enforcement subsequently indicted various members of three of
Israel’s largest private investigative agencies on charges of
criminal fraud. These spyware plants were in various commercial
areas such as : Israeli
military contracting, telephone systems, cable television, finance,
automobile and cigarette importing, journalism and high technology. These
intrusive spyware plants were nearly identical with ones developed
by the American NSA and widely used inside the United States to
glean political, economic and counter-intelligence information from
a huge number of American businesses and agencies. Israeli
investigators believed that there was illicit cooperation between
the American agency and a counterpart in Israel.
These
Trojan horses that
penetrated the Israeli computers
came packaged inside a compact disc or were sent as an e-mail
message that appeared to be from an institution or a person that the
victims thought they knew very well. Once the program was installed,
it functioned every time the victim’s computer system was in use,
logging keystrokes or collecting sensitive documents and passwords
before transmitting the information elsewhere.
This clandestine theft of
valuable commercial, military and political secrets is certainly not
limited to Israel and many important agencies and individuals have
become increasingly concerned about what is called “phishing” in
which both con men and foreign (and domestic) intelligence agencies
can locate, capture and use valuable personal, political and
financial information. In September of 2005, the Anti-Phishing
Working Group, an ad hoc group of
corporate and law enforcement groups that track identity theft and
other online crimes, said it had received more than 13,000 unique
reports of phishing schemes in that month alone, up from nearly
7,000 in the month of October, 2004..
In late 2005, a new form of
phishing, called “spear-phishing” emerged.
.So-called
spear-phishing
is a highly concentrated and far more effectove version of phishing.
That's because those behind the schemes bait their hooks for
specific victims instead of casting a broad, ill-defined net across
cyberspace hoping to catch throngs of unknown victims.
Spear-phishing, say
security specialists, is much harder to detect than phishing. Bogus
e-mail messages and Web sites not only look like near perfect
replicas of communiqués from e-commerce companies like eBay
or its PayPal service, banks or even a victim's employer, but are
also targeted at people known to have an established relationship
with the sender being mimicked. American banks such as Chase and
Bank of America are among those whose names are faked and also the
online auction house of Ebay and the international money transfer
firm of PayPal receive considerable attention from the international
conmen and credit thieves. These thieves are not necessarily gangs
operating for financial gain but also include theft of trade
secrets, private corporate banking and highly sensitive military and
political information.
While some of these phishers are merely
out to make money, others are interested in securing military
secrets and political activities, all at the highest and what is
hopefully considered as the most secure.
As a case in point, in June
of 2005 , the National Infrastructure Security Coordination Centre,
a British government agency that monitors national UK computer
security, took the step of publicly warning about a spear-phishing
campaign of "targeted Trojan e-mail attacks" aimed at
industrial and government computer networks. The warning noted that
the e-mail messages appeared to come from a trusted sender, that
antivirus software and firewalls was completely incapable of
protecting recipients,
and that, in fact, there was no way to completely protect any
computer connected to the Internet from the Trojan attacks once
recipients opened and downloaded a faked e-mail message containing a
virus.
The report noted that:
"Files used by the attackers are often publicly available on
the Web or have been sent to distribution lists," the warning
said. "The attackers are able to receive, trojanise and resend
a document within 120 minutes of its release, indicating a high
level of sophistication."
In December of 2005, a more
traditional phishing scam infected about 30,000 individual computers
worldwide, according to CipherTrust, a computer security firm.
Consisting of what CipherTrust said was about 50 million e-mail
messages that a German hacker deployed simultaneously, the communiqués
purported to come from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Central Intelligence Agency and a German intelligence agency and
tried to convince recipients to provide personal information and
open a file containing a virus. The F.B.I. issued a warning about
the scheme and a spokeswoman said that thousands of people swamped
the agency with phone calls inquiring about it.
Public awareness and FBI actions sharply reduced and finally
obliterated this specific form of fraud but no information has been
released to the public by the FBI concerning the identity or motives
of many of the hackers. No
bank or financial institution ever contacts their depositors and
customers by email with warnings about misuse of their credit cards
or errors in their personal accounts. The phishers have advanced
technologically to the point where actual company logos can be
snatched from Web sites to build customized databases of corporate
logos. Any email message purporting to come from any bank or
financial institution, most especially one that has the proper
company logo and format but contains grammatical errors should ever
be responded to.
Some computer security
specialists suggest at least one basic approach that might allow
e-mail recipients to learn right away that a communiqué appearing
to come from a company like Amazon.com
actually originated somewhere in the Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria,
Poland, Russia or any of the other places that law enforcement
officials say are hot spots for phishing scams According to
CipherTrust, a spear-phisher can rent a server for about $300 month
after paying a $100 setup fee; install spam-sending software on the
server for about $1,200 a month; and get spam-sending proxies, a
database of e-mail addresses, and other necessary add-ons for
another $1,900 a month. How much phishers make depends on how many
victims they hook, but the relatively small expense means the work
can be lucrative. According to a research report issued in June by Gartner
Inc., a consulting firm, about 2.4 million Americans
reported losing about $929 million to phishing schemes during the
previous year.
In 2005, is has been
estimated by the FBI and private cyper-protection agencies that
about 73 million American adults who use the Internet believed that
they received an average of more than 50 phishing e-mails during the
prior 12 months. And that, of course, is just what Internet users
actually know might be happening.
Phishers main goal is to
obtain a victim’s checking-account number and, in addition,
credit card and A.T.M. card numbers, which they can copy onto
bogus cards they have manufactured for the purpose of extracting
money and goods from a victim’s account.
It should be noted that
many American banks have serious security gaps in the software used
to analyze magnetic stripe coding on the back of A.T.M. cards, and
these gaps have permitted card hijackers to use bogus copies.
American regulators, concerned about online vulnerabilities at the
country's banks, have sharply tightened security requirements at
financial institutions.
Although Interner Provider
(IP) numbers lead to Italy, the Netherlands, the Ukraine, Romania,
Bulgaria, Poland, and Russia, a secret investigation by NSA and
other American domestic and foreign intelligence agencies has
disclosed that almost all of the scams originate inside Israel and
that while the Israeli authorities are aware of this, the fact that
information considered “vital to the interests of the State of
Israel” is part of the intercepts, no action has been taken
against operations that are not directed against Israeli agencies or
individuals. Further,
one of the caveats to the continued functioning of these enormously
profitable computer frauds is that any monies gleaned from them must
be deposited in Israeli, and not foreign, banks.
Isreali intelligence,
having formed a cooperative association with Israeli internet
swindlers, has, according to an NSA report, not hesitated to spy on
their American counterparts.
Among
the Israeli corporations on the receiving end of stolen information
were two telecommunications affiliates of Bezeq, the country's
largest telephone company. The Israeli government held a controlling
interest in Bezeq until it sold most of its stake to private
investors, including Los Angeles media mogul Haim Saban, shortly
before the Trojan horse scandal became public. A lawyer representing
Bezeq and the two affiliates, YES and Pele-Phone, declined to
comment on the investigation; Mr. Wismonsky said that Bezeq itself
appeared to have been a victim, not a recipient, of stolen
information.
Israeli
intelligence also is able to oversee almost all telephonic contacts,
to include internet usage, in the United States.
This
is accomplished by obtaining and analyzing data that is generated
every time someone in the U.S. makes a telephone call.
Here
is how the system works. Most directory assistance calls, and virtually
all call records and billing inside the U.S. are done for the
telephone companies by Amdocs Ltd., an Israeli-based private
telecommunications company.
Amdocs
has contracts with the 25 biggest telephone companies in America,
and even more worldwide. The White House and other secure government
phone lines are protected, but it is virtually impossible for any
American to make a call on any American phone without generating an Amdocs
record of it.
In
recent years, the FBI and other government agencies have
investigated Amdocs more than once. The firm has repeatedly
and adamantly denied any security breaches or wrongdoing. In 1999,
the super secret National Security Agency, headquartered in Ft.
George Meade in northern Maryland, issued what is called a Top
Secret Sensitive Compartmentalized Information report, TS/SCI,
warning that records of calls in the United States were getting into
foreign hands – in Israel, in particular.
Investigators
do not believe such calls are being listened to, but the data about
who is calling whom and when is extremely valuable in itself. An
internal Amdocs memo to senior company executives suggests
just how Amdocs generated call records could be used.
“Widespread data mining techniques and algorithms...combining both
the properties of the customer (e.g., credit rating) and properties
of the specific ‘behavior….’” Specific behavior,
such as who the targeted customers are calling is also noted.
The
Amdocs memo says the system should be publicly advertised as “helping
to prevent telephone fraud.” However, U.S.
counterintelligence analysts say it could, and unquestionably was,
also be used to spy via the records of the American telephone
system. The N.S.A has held numerous classified conferences to warn
the F.B.I. and C.I.A. how Amdocs records could be used.
At
one classified NSA briefing, a diagram by the Argonne National
Laboratory was used to show that if phone records are not completely
secure, major security breaches are more than possible.
Another
NSA briefing document said, "It has become increasingly
apparent that systems and networks are vulnerable…Such crimes
always involve unauthorized persons, or persons who exceed their
authorization...citing on exploitable vulnerabilities."
Those
vulnerabilities are growing, because according to another briefing,
the U.S. relies too much on foreign companies like Amdocs for
high-tech equipment and software. "Many factors have led to
increased dependence on code developed overseas.... We buy rather
than train or develop solutions."
U.S.
intelligence does not officially believe the Israeli
government is involved in a misuse of information, and Amdocs
insists that its data is secure. What U.S. government officials are
worried about, however, is the possibility that Amdocs data
could get into the wrong hands, particularly organized crime. And
that would not be the first time that such a thing has happened.
In
a 1997 drug trafficking case in Los Angeles, telephone information,
specifically of the type that Amdocs collects, was used to "completely
compromise the communications of the FBI, the Secret Service, the
DEA and the LAPD."
There
has been considerable but very quiet concern about the 60 Israelis
who were detained in the anti-terror investigation, and the
suspicion that some investigators have that they may have picked up
information on the 9/11 attacks ahead of time and not passed it on.
There
exists a classified Justice Department report stating that the Mossad,
the Israeli intelligence agency, did indeed send representatives to
the U.S. to warn, just before 9/11, that a major terrorist attack
was imminent. How does that leave room for the lack of a warning?
What
investigators have stated is that that warning from the Mossad
was nonspecific and extremely vague and general, and they believe
that it may have had something to do with the Israeli desire to
protect what are called “sources and methods” in the
intelligence community while at the same time attempting to convince
American authorities that they were being cooperative and friendly.
There is very substantive and documented evidence that those sources
and methods were, and still are, taking place in the United States.
The
question arose in the Select Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill,
chaired by former CIA agent, Porter Goss. Concern was expressed
concerning this Mossad spying issue but nothing came of this
and the matter was very quickly, and quietly, shelved
An
official listing of known Mossad agents and a much larger one
listing Mossad informants in the
United States is perhaps the best indicator of the degree and extent
that this official Israeli organ has penetrated American security,
business and military organizations. Its publication would certainly
create terrible havoc and would very adversely impact on
American/Israeli diplomatic and military relations.
Reports
indicate that such established agencies as the Anti Defamation
League, several identified national newspapers and one major
television network also harbor and assist a significant number of
active Mossad
agents engaged in espionage activities.
The
concern about telephone security extends to another company, founded
in Israel, that provides the technology used by the U.S. government
for electronic eavesdropping. The company is Comverse Infosys,
a subsidiary of an Israeli-run private telecommunications firm, with
offices throughout the U.S. It provides wiretapping equipment for
law enforcement. Investigative reports also indicate that these
offices have been and are being used as bases for intelligence
operations directed against the United States via the Mossad
agents working in this country.
Here
is the method that foreign wiretapping works in the U.S.
Every
time a call is made in America, it passes through the nation's
elaborate network of switchers and routers run by the phone
companies. Custom computers and software, made by companies like Comverse,
are tied into that network to intercept, record and store the
wiretapped calls, and at the same time transmit them to
investigators.
The
manufacturers have continuing access to the computers so they can
service them and keep them free of technical errors. This process
was authorized by the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law
Enforcement Act, or CALEA. Senior government officials have
reluctantly acknowledged that while CALEA made officially
authorized, and unauthorized, wiretapping much easier for Federal
authorities, it has led to a system that is seriously vulnerable to
compromise, and may have undermined the whole wiretapping system.
Attorney
General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were both
warned on October 18, 2001 in a hand-delivered letter from 15 local,
state and federal law enforcement officials, who complained
that "law enforcement's current electronic surveillance
capabilities are less effective today than they were at the
time CALEA was enacted."
Congress
insists the equipment it permits to be installed is secure. But the complaint
about this system is that the wiretap computer programs made by Comverse
have, in effect, a back door through which wiretaps themselves can be
intercepted by unauthorized parties.
In
this case, the unauthorized parties is the Israeli Mossad and
through them, the government and commercial interests of Israel
itself.
Adding
to the suspicions is the fact that in Israel, Comverse works closely
with the Israeli government, and under special programs and gets reimbursed
for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by the
Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. But investigators within the DEA,
INS and FBI have all privately stated that to pursue or even suggest Israeli
spying through Comverse is considered career suicide because
of the enormous political and political power wielded by the Israeli
lobby, the extremely pro-Israeli American television and print media
and many Jewish financial organizations in the United States.
And
sources say that while various F.B.I. inquiries into Comverse
have been conducted over the years, they have been halted
before the actual equipment has ever been thoroughly tested for
leaks. A 1999 F.C.C. document indicates several government
agencies expressed deep concerns that too many unauthorized
non-law enforcement personnel can access the wiretap system.
The FBI's own small office in Chantilly, Virginia that actually
oversees the CALEA wiretapping program, is among the most agitated about
the Israeli ongoing threat.
It
is the FBI's office in Quantico, Virginia, that has
jurisdiction over awarding contracts and buying intercept
equipment. And for years, they have awarded the majority of the business
to Comverse. A handful of former U.S. law enforcement
officials involved in awarding Comverse lucrative
U.S. government contracts over the years now work for the
Israeli-based company.
Numerous
sources say some of those individuals were asked to leave government
service under what knowledgeable sources call "troublesome circumstances"
that still remain under administrative review within the Justice Department.
And
what troubles investigators the most, particularly in New York City,
in the counter terrorism investigation of the World Trade
Center attack, is that in a number of cases, suspects they had
sought to wiretap and survey immediately changed their
telecommunications processes. This began as soon as those supposedly
secret wiretaps went into place
There
are growing and very serious concerns in a very significant number
of top-level American intelligence and counterintelligence. Many of
these agencies have begun compiling evidence, and instigating a very
highly classified investigation, into the very strong
probability that the Israeli government is directly involved in this
matter and has been from the outset.
Speaking
confidentially, top U.S. intelligence agencies indicate that “the
last thing needed is another Pollard scandal.”
Following
the 9/11 attacks, Federal officials have arrested or detained nearly
200 Israeli citizens suspected of belonging to an "organized
intelligence-gathering operation." The Bush
administration has deported most of those arrested after Sept. 11,
although some are in custody under the new anti-terrorism law. Some
of these detainees are being investigated for their possible
penetration of known Arab terrorist groups located in the United
States, Canada and Europe and through this, having gained specific
knowledge of the time and location of the September 11 attacks.
It
has been established that an Israeli firm generated billing data
that could be used for intelligence purpose, and a recent Justice
Department report describes concerns that the federal government's
own wiretapping system may be vulnerable.
In
Los Angeles, in 1997, a major local, state and federal drug
investigation suddenly collapsed. The suspects: Israeli organized
crime organizations, composed mostly of Russian Jews, with ongoing
operations in New York, Miami, Las Vegas, Canada, Israel and Egypt.
The
allegations: cocaine and ecstasy trafficking, and sophisticated
white-collar credit card and computer fraud. . A DEA report under
date of December 18 stated that there existed serious security
breaches in DEA telecommunications by unauthorized "foreign
nationals" -- and cites an Israeli-owned firm with which the
DEA contracted for wiretap equipment .
The
problem: according to classified law enforcement documents, is that
the Israeli-based gangsters had the Federal and State law
enforcement beepers, cell phones, even home phones under constant
surveillance. Some identified Israeli gangsters who did get caught,
readily admitted to having hundreds of confidential law enforcement
telephone and beeper numbers and had been using them to avoid
arrest.
An
official LAPD intelligence report states:
"This
compromised law enforcement communications between LAPD detectives
and other assigned law enforcement officers working various aspects
of the case. The Israeli-based criminal organization discovered
communications between organized crime intelligence division
detectives, the FBI and the Secret Service."
Shock
spread from the DEA to the FBI in Washington, and then the CIA. An
investigation of the problem, according to law enforcement
documents, concluded, "The (criminal) organization has
apparent extensive access to database systems used to identify
pertinent personal and biographical information."
When
investigators tried to find out where the information might have
come from, they looked at Amdocs, a publicly traded firm
based in Israel. Amdocs generates billing data for
virtually every call in America, and they do credit checks. The
company denies any leaks, but investigators still fear that the
firm's data is getting into the wrong hands.
When
investigators checked their own wiretapping system for leaks, they
grew concerned about potential vulnerabilities in the computers that
intercept, record and store the wiretapped calls. A main contractor
is Comverse Infosys, which works closely with the Israeli
government, and under a special grant program, is reimbursed for up
to 50 percent of its research and development costs by Israel's
Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Asked
about another sprawling investigation and the detention of 60
Israelis since Sept. 11, the Bush administration treated the
questions with frightened circumspection. The reason for this is
also contained in the body of several U.S. investigative and highly
classified reports. The extremely competent Israeli Foreign
Intelligence branch, the MOSSAD, had penetrated the groups of
terrorists who planned, and eventually executed, the hijacked
aircraft attack on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the
White House. After some debate in the highest official circles in
Tel Aviv, the Israeli government decided to pass the very concrete
and specific information about the September 11th attack
to competent authority in the United States. This was done on three
specific occasions, the Department of State, the CIA and the NSC all
having been given MOSSAD reports. The nature and specific targets of
the attacks were specified as were two different probable dates of
attack. That the Bush Administration was informed of this planned
attack by a putative ally and in specific detail and did nothing to
attempt to circumvent it, came as a great surprise to Israeli
officials. When it
became obvious to them that their specific and timely warnings were
obviously ignored, it then put Israel politicians in the position of
having information which, if released to the American public, would
cause terminal political damage, they decided, according to
intercepted internet communication, that silence would guarantee
future cooperation by the compromised Bush administration in any
questionable Israeli political or military adventures in the Middle
East.
Examples
of typical email frauds
Example
No 1
From : <information_vital@virgilio.it>
Reply-To : <information_vital@virgilio.it>
Sent : Tuesday, May 2, 2006 7:33 AM
Subject : Ticket
No: 007802199001
Ticket
No: 007802199001
RE:
WINNING FINAL NOTIFICATION
LOTTO
NL
INTERNATIONAL PRIZE
AWARD DEPT.
Sir/Madam,
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
We
happily announce to you the draw (#360) of the LOTTO NL
INTERNATIONAL LOTTERY PROGRAMM, held on monday 1st of march 2006. It
is yet to be unclaimed and you are getting the final NOTIFICATION as
regards this.Your e-mail address attached to ticket number:
363775668993 7659 with Serial number 4571/06drew the lucky
numbers:4-8-16-32-42-52(bonus no.50), which subsequently won you the
lottery in the 3rd category i.e match 5 plus bonus.
You
have therefore been approved to claim a total sum of 2.450,000 (Two
million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds sterling) in cash
credited to file KTU/7034818304/06. This is from a total cash prize
of 10,000,000 shared amongst the (5) lucky winners in this category
i.e. Match 5 plus bonus. All participants for the online version
were selected randomly from World Wide Web sites through computer
draw system and extracted from over 100,000 unions, associations,
and corporate bodies that are listed online. This promotion
takes place weekly.Please note that your lucky winning number falls
within our European booklet representative office in Europe as
indicated in your play coupon. In view of this, your 2.450,000 (Two
million four hundred and fifty thousand pounds sterling) will be
released to you by any of oupayment offices in Europe.
Our
European agent will immediately commence the process to facilitate
the release of your funds as soon as you contact her. For security
reasons, you are advised to keep your winning information
confidential till your claim is processed and your money remitted to
you in whatever manner you deem fit to claim your prize.
This
is part of our precautionary measure to avoid double claiming and
unwarranted abuse of this program.
Please
be warned.To file for your claim, please contact our fiduciary
agent:
Mr.
Wim Molly
Tel:+31-616-557-921
Fax:
++31-847-136-657
Email:
dgclaimoffice1@netscape.net
1.
FULL NAMES:_______________________________________________________
2.NATIONALITY:_______________________________________________________
3.
AGE________________________________________
4.
SEX:_________________________
5.
MARITAL STATUS:_____________________________________
6.CONTACT
ADDRESS:_____________________________________________
7.TELEPHONE
NUMBER:___________________
8.OCCUPATION:_________________________________
9.BRIEF
DESCRIPTION OF
COMPANY/INDIVIDUAL:_______________________________________
10.WINNING
E-MAIL ADDRESS:________________________________
11.WINNING
NUMBER:_________________________________________
12TOTAL
AMOUNT WON:_________________________________________
Endeavour
to email/fax him your full names, winning numbers, email address,
telephone and fax
numbers
immediately.
Congratulations
from me and members of staff of LOTTO NL LOTTERY.
Yours
faithfully,
Mary Evens
Online
coordinator for
LOTTO
NL LOTTERY
Sweepstakes
International Program.
EXAMPLE No. 2
From:
Ernest Kemp gvva@boskma.nl
To: brianharring@yahoo.com
Subject: practical
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:11 PM
News was released.
Cyberhand Technologies
International Starts Construction on Sound Activated Anti-Personnel
Fighting Robot Prototype. Go
to yahoo financial and read it now…
Cyberhand Technologies
International, Inc
CYHD,
Michael Burke, CEO of
Cyberhand Technologies said, “Bexcause of the potential collateral
damage caused by some of today’s weapons and missiles in enemy
urban environments, we believe that our products will reduce the
chances of injuring or killing innocent people in surrounding areas
in which we strike.”
About Cyberhand Technologies
International Inc.
Cyberhand Technologies
International Inc. focuses on Aerospace Weapons Systems that provide
the world’s fastest controllers and most accurate target
acquisition, generating the best field results, as well as
innovative wireless ergonomic products
for private and military purposes.
Do your research now and start
watching CYHD like a
hawk.
Information within this report
contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section
27a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21b of the SEC Act of
1934. Statements that involve discussions with projections of future
events are not statements of historical fact and may be forward
looking statements. Don’t rely on them to make a decision. The
Company is not a reporting company registered under the Exchange Act
of 1934. We have received two million free trading shares and twenty
five thousand dollars c ash from a third party not an officer,
director or affiliate shareholder. We intend to sell our shares now
which could cause the shares to go down, resulting in losses for
you.. This company has an accumulated deficit, nominal cash and no
revenues in its most recent quarter with the float current
increasing. The company may need financing to continue as a going
concern. A failure to finance could cause the company to go out of
business. Read the Company’s Annual Report and Information
Statement before you invest. This report shall not be construed as
any kind of investment advise or solicitation. You can lose all your
money by investing in this stock.
|