Home

   Archive


   Links


   Contact Us


   Webmaster


 
 
TBR News July 9, 2007

 

Notice!

Our new security system prevents email messages coming through the AOL server from being delivered to our address. This is because of the probability of unwelcome and problematical attachments to messages from this source.  Correspondents wishing to contact TBR News are suggested to use another server. Ed.

Announcing TBR Ebooks!

Starting with a new publication concerning the background behind the 9/11 attacks, TBR News will be presenting a series of interesting, informative and definitive works for our readers. Future titles will include the complete Voice of the White House with much more added material that was considered too controversial to post, the heavily-censored Armenian Holocaust of 1916, the Bush-Lay private correspondence, the Assassination of JFK,Pearl Harbor intrigues and rare documents, Malaparte’s inside study of the making of revolution, sensational selected articles from the German Rudolf historical revision files, unpublished before Rudolf’s arrest and forced deportation to Germany, World War II studies of holocaust history, taken from secret German files and much more. Please see the title page for more information.

The Editors

Descending Into Darkness: The Harring Report

A well-researched study into the background of the 9/11 attack: Who knew what and when did they know it. Russian and German intelligence material, not published before show that the U.S. had ample warning...and did nothing about it.

THE VOICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE

The full collection of the twice-weekly commentary of what is really going on inside the corrupt Bush White House. The spectrum includes the Gannon scandal, the planned invasion of Iran, many stories of stupidity and corruption coupled with biting sarcasm. Interesting to note that many, if not most, of the predictions have come true.

REGICIDE The Official Assassination of John F. Kennedy

A landmark book that sold very well in hardback, this work contains actual intelligence documents concerning the inside U.S. plans to kill Kennedy; the reasons, the methods and the results.

The Final Reckoning: An Analysis of Demographics in Holocaust Literature

By Harold Kreig, Lt.Col, AUS ret.

This is the first rational, heavily documented work on the subject of the Holocaust. Colonel Krieg has taken thousands of documents, including the official SS concentration camp records from 1935 through 1945 and official U.S. government postwar analysis of the system and the casualties and causes of death and produced a book that is highly informative and readable.  Heavily footnoted and annotated, ‘The Final Reckoning’ is logical and compelling and is an historical work that should be read through by any student of the period and subject.

Coup D’Etat: The Technique Of Revolution

By Curzio Malaparte

First published in Italy by Curzio Malaparte in 1928, this is a seminal work on historical seizures of power from Napoleon through Hitler.

Gestapo-Chief: The CIA & Heinrich Müller by Gregory Douglas

 

                In 1948, the former head of Hitelr’s Gestapo was interviewed by senior officials of the CIA in Switzerland where Müller had been in hiding since the end of the Second World War. His interview, for Colonel James Critchfield of the CIA’s Gehlen Organization, runs to nearly a thousand pages and for years was hidden in the CIA’s files.

                This is a translation of a part of the interview, which was initially conducted in German and then translated into English for CIA use.

                It is a fascinating series of historical episodes covering both the Axis and Allied sides with comments on Hitler, Stalin, Roosevelt, Henry Wallace, Winston Churchill, the 20th of July bomb plot against Hitler, Bishop von Galen’s heroic, and successful, attacks on the Nazis and their euthanasia program, the concentration camps, the Duke of Windsor, the Roger Casement diaries and many more fascinating and insightful views of a man who ran the most effective counter-intelligence agency in modern times. 

                There is also extensive information on the attempts on the part of the CIA to silence or discredit the fact that the Gestapo Chief worked for the United States and eventually came to live in Washington, D.C. as part of the notorious “Operation Paperclip.”

                Fascinating inside views of many top Nazis and CIA officials. 

The CIA COvenant: Nazis in Washington

by Gregory Douglas

* From the end of World War II, the American CIA imported thousands of Nazis into the United States to work for them, many on the list of wanted war criminals

*One of the most important of these was Heinrich Mueller, once head of Hitler's Gestapo. Mueller was recruited by Colonel James Critchfield who ran the CIA's "Gehnel Organization' in Munich.

* Mueller kept journals and this book is a translation of three years (1948-1951) of notes and observations made of top CIA officials, President Truman, top U.S. government officials, plans for murder, thefts, kidnappings, wholesale thefts of public money and a terrifying pattern of uncontrolled ambition, unchecked by any person or agency.

* Also included are CIA and other agency's activities that have never been revealed.

*Mueller's deals in stolen Nazi art for the CIA are covered in detail.

*Also to be found are the steps the frightened CIA have taken to prevent the publication, sales or distribution of this work.

An Essay on the Principle of Population

by Thomas Malthus

The 1798 classic study of how supplies of food do not keep up with an expanding population

Malthus' theory is that population growth is geometric while the food supply increase is arithmetic.

A very literate and current study that clearly highlights present and current population problems

With the world's population higher than ever before, this is a work of great and current interest

CONSPIRACIES for Fun and Profit

Contents
The Evil Catholics Murdered Abraham Lincoln
TWA Flight 800: The Gathering of the Nuts
The Real Truth About the Kennedy Assassination!
The Great 9-11 Plot
Who is Sorcha Faal?
The Bush Indictments
Faked Conspiracy photos
The Sinking of the MV Estonia
The German Guy and the Destruction of Houston
The Great Contrail Conspiracy
Planet X
Remote Viewing unveiled

Notice!

Our new security system prevents email messages coming through the AOL server from being delivered to our address. This is because of the probability of unwelcome and problematical attachments to messages from this source, coupled with the fact that AOL’s voluntary cooperation with various American, and foreign, law enforcement groups makes contact with them in any form a risky business.  Correspondents wishing to contact TBR News are suggested to use another server. Ed.

“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people, On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”
- H.L. Mencken

“That we are to stand by the president, right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
-Theodore Roosevelt

“Mass movements do not usually rise until the prevailing order has been discredited. The discrediting is not an automatic result of the blunders and abuses of those in power, but the deliberate work of men of words with a grievance.”
-Eric Hoffer The True Believer

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

America’s Enemies!

There are four entities who represent the most dangerous enemies to American liberties since George III.

They are:

1.                    The Neocons or Likudists who owe their personal allegiance to another country and now completely control our foreign policy. They lied and deceived us into the Iraq war and are demanding that more and more American soldiers die to preserve their own country and ideals.

2.                    The Christian Evangelical right who is trying to force the United States into becoming a theocracy under their rule. They know in their hearts that they alone can restructure a secular humanist America into their idea of Heaven on Earth.

3.                    An element of American society that call themselves Patriots and are obsessively militaristic and great admirers of the corporate or fascistic state. Many of these have been very minor members of the American military and as a counterbalance to their reserve or rear area tours of duty, are rabidly in favor of draconian military action, the bloodier the better. Usually these drumbeaters are too old, or too fat, to fight and have no sons of draft age.

4.                    George W. Bush, who is the worst president in the history of the United States and directly responsible for the huge death tolls in Iraq, is determined to rule the United States until God puts a stop to him and is even more determined to force the American people into becoming obedient, Christian and self-sacrificing lemmings who worship at his shrine and march in step.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

 

 

The Voice of the White House

Washington, D.C., July 7, 2007: “If Bush were not such a vicious and vindictive man, I would feel sorry for him. He has been soundly thrashed in the court of public opinion, his actual (as opposed to faked polls by the friendly media) poll numbers have dropped to 19% and are sharply and quickly falling, his top Republicans in Congress have run away from him in panic lest too close an association with him and his failed policies besmirch their reelection to the Great Hog Trough.

And how does Bush react? He gets shit-faced drunk in the private quarters and the Secret Service people have to pry him up off the rug and put him to bed. They refuse, however to clean up the puke and piss he had left all over the floors and leave that to the White House maintenance staff. Nancy Reagan had George 86ed out of the White House during her husband’s occupancy because he once pissed all over the carpets in the hall during a dinner.

Let’s face it, George is a binge drinker and always has been. He was passed out cold the second day of Katrina down at the Old Ranch in Crawford and none of his frantic staff in the White House could get through to him. Can you imagine the major panic if, say, Mexico attacked us while Bush was out cold? Or North Korea launched a missile aimed at Alaska?

On the other hand, his second-in--command, Dirty Dick Cheney (whose real poll numbers are at 6%!)  is not a drunk but he is a flaming fascist nut and a genuine basket case. I have never met such a cold, really evil man in my entire life. Cheney was behind the war in Iraq and Cheney wants desperately to bomb Iran. It was because Cheney has done so many criminal acts that Libby got off. Now we hear here that Bush will give Libby a full and complete pardon later on so he can continue to practice law and make more millions.

But on the Libby matter, Bush was in the perfect corner. If he did not pardon or commute Libby’s justified jail sentence, Libby would go to jail and talk and talk. He had no choice at all and the only question was how to tart the inevitable decision up to at least pass muster with the press.

My advice? Impeach both of them before, in their frantic desperation, they try to start another war somewhere.

And don’t think Cheney isn’t capable of pushing the button. He hates Putin, who is running rings around him and his crew, and wants to have our useless CIA assassinate him or at least encourage others to do this.

Cheney is especially pissed off because he is deeply involved in the oil industry and Putin  is taking it over. Because Saudi Arabian oil fields are running out very quickly, the US and the oil people are really frantic to lay their hands on oil. Not from Chavez either. They have pissed in the bathtub and now they have to lie in it.

When the American public learns that light sweet crude has gone to $100 a barrel, they will drown all of these sleazy crooks in the bathwater and set the White House on fire.

Impeach Now!”

Addition on July 8.: George and Laura just returned from a weekend visit to Camp David. It was his 61st birthday the other day and when they left the White House for the helicopter, the staff had put together a crowd of staffers and their families that Bush wouldn’t recognize, lined them up behind a yellow tape and had them wave and shout nice things as the Royal Couple walked by. Bush was waving gleefully with both hands like a small child before opening his Christmas presents. One of my friends heard him say to the wife as they neared the helicopter, “I told you they all still love me!” And his wife nodded and said, ”Yes, they surely do, George.” She lied. After she complained to Barbara about Karen Hughes and George, and Karen was shipped back to Texas, she has been much happier. Now she has him all to herself, poor woman. And after the Departure and the chance for George to get plastered again, the Secret Service passed out little bags of nuts with official emblems on them to some of the children. These came off of Air Force One and were not very fresh. I personally think they dated back to Reagan and  I know because I picked up two packets for my wife’s parakeet who likes to nibble on nuts (no nasty comments here, please) but the bird sniffed at the soggy relics and flew back up to her perch and took a dump on the Imperial nuts. I checked the other packet out and the nuts were very soft and basically rotten.. Typical of what goes on around here. And pathetic. Bush had no idea this was a planted crowd and was very happy. Recently, he has been so depressed that everyone is afraid he will get shitfaced in public and fall down at a press conference.”

Addendum on Monday, July 9, 2007 at 8:25 EST. “There is absolute panic here in the White House over the swelling defections of major Republican lawmakers over the Iraq war. Everyone but Karl Rove and Cheney insist that Bush make public some serious withdrawal plan before September next. Most of the White House staffers have always supported Bush but now that it is evident that his ship is about to sink, everyone is rushing around here trying desperately to get him to save something, anything, by actually withdrawing troops before September. Only Rove and Cheney, being nuts, demand he ’hold the line’ and not yield any of his invented power to the evil and treacherous Congress. This is like doing ward duty over at St. Elisabeth’s local loonie bin, believe me. You can smell the fear all over this place and frankly, it’s fun to observe the rats looking for a way to the deck to jump off the ship.”

Lonely and lame, Bush agonises over legacy

· President avoids limelight after Libby backlash

· Republican ally withdraws support over Iraq

July 7, 2007

Ewen MacAskill in Washington

The Guardian

President George Bush turned 61 yesterday but he had little to celebrate at the end of a week in which his isolation has been exposed as never before.

Laura Bush held an early family party for him on Wednesday, to which a few professional golfers were also invited, and on Thursday the president made a rare outing to watch a baseball game. But these few birthday celebrations apart, it has been a relentless week for the US president.

A backlash against his decision on Monday to commute the jail sentence of the former White House aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby was followed on Thursday by the withdrawal of support for his Iraq strategy by Pete Domenici, a Republican senator for 35 years. The loss of such a loyal senator is ominous for Mr Bush's war plans.

More defections are expected, and Mr Bush cuts a lonely figure, holed up in the White House fretting over his legacy.

Professor Robert Dallek, author of several books about the presidency, said that while it was not unusual for a president to limp to the end of his term as a lame duck, he saw Mr Bush as a particularly pronounced case. "If you are looking at defeat, no one wants to be associated with the person responsible. This is the case with Bush. You do not see his party rally round. He has united opinion against him and it makes for a lonely, isolated position," Prof Dallek said. "Once a president loses trust, he cannot govern effectively."

Although he has 18 months left in office, Mr Bush's options are limited. Last week, he lost his last chance for snatching a lasting domestic legacy when his immigration reform bill was destroyed in Congress. On foreign policy, there is little optimism of a late breakthrough on Israel-Palestine, Iran or Iraq.

The Washington Post reported this week on academics invited to the White House to discuss with him his legacy, including Sir Alistair Horne, author of a history of the Algerian revolt, which has parallels with Iraq. They, as well as former staffers and friends, spoke of his loneliness, his agonising over how history will portray him. Michael Conaway, a still loyal senator and long-time friend, said the president appeared to be worn down by the pressure and spoke of "a marked difference in his physical appearance".

Although never a social animal, he is reluctant to drop into Washington restaurants unannounced for dinner, as the Clintons did, in part because he is fearful of the public response. This week, in particular, because of the Libby decision, he has largely avoided public contact - his July 4 speech in West Virginia was invitation-only.

The White House presented the Libby decision as a non-political compromise.

A well-connected source in Washington challenged the consensus that Mr Bush's poll ratings, at just under 30%, could not fall much further because that figure represented bedrock Republican support. The source said commuting Mr Libby's sentence, a popular move among Republicans, was a panic measure after an alarming erosion in support, mainly because of hostility to the immigration plan.

Mr Domenici's withdrawal of support followed the desertion of the Republican senator Richard Lugar last week, also over Iraq. About 50% of the sitting Republican senators face re-election in November next year and their constituents have made them well aware of how unpopular the Iraq war is.

The White House yesterday expressed disappointment, saying it had hoped the senators would not go public with their frustration before September, when the army and others report back on whether Mr Bush's "surge" strategy is working.

Steve Clemons, head of the progressive thinktank the New America Foundation, has heard the reports of Mr Bush's decline in power and is sceptical. He cautioned: "Even though he has lost some ability to dictate events, he is still capable of deploying major influence on the big issues. We went through the same thing with [Vice-president Dick] Cheney when people thought he was down and out. I think it is a big mistake to think Bush is now powerless."

With little positive to show from six years in office, Mr Bush has been talking up his transformation of the supreme court as his legacy. He has given it a strong rightwing bias, demonstrated by rulings on abortion, employment discrimination and rejection of death penalty appeals. That will please Republicans, at least.

But Prof Dallek remains unimpressed. Rating the worst presidents, he said: "Hoover was a disaster. Warren Harding rates very low in the pantheon of presidents and it is likely that Bush will be seen as a bottom feeder."

Comment: Bush is, without question, the worst president in American history. He has left a legacy of ineptness, cruelty, viciousness, greed and lunatic behavior that has done, and is doing, terrible damage to the institutions of our government and to all the people of this country.   BH

White House Again to Defy Congress on Attorney Firings

by Peter Baker

San Frencisco Chronicle

WASHINGTON  - The White House has decided to defy Congress in its latest demand for information regarding the dismissal of nine U.S. attorneys, sources familiar with the decision said Saturday. Such an action would escalate the constitutional struggle and propel it closer to a court showdown.

Senate and House committees have directed President Bush to provide by Monday a detailed justification of his executive privilege claims and a full accounting of documents he is withholding. But White House counsel Fred Fielding plans to tell lawmakers that he has already provided the legal basis for the claims and will not provide a log of withheld documents, the sources said.

The standoff suggests that neither side is prepared to budge in the fight over documents and testimony in the widening U.S. attorney investigation. Officials in both camps said no serious negotiations are taking place to resolve the dispute, while Fielding plans to follow up his letter by further asserting executive privilege later this week, directing former White House aides Harriet Miers and Sara Taylor not to testify in response to congressional subpoenas.

The two sides increasingly believe the matter will lead congressional Democrats to seek criminal contempt citations against the White House, which could result in a protracted court battle over the contours of the president’s power to shield White House deliberations. Both sides insist the other’s legal position is weak and argue that this could be one of the most important test cases in years.

The impasse is leading to “a monumental clash between the executive and legislative branches of government,” Taylor’s attorney, W. Neil Eggleston, wrote in a letter sent Saturday to Fielding and leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The conflict stems from congressional investigations into the dismissal last year of nine chief federal prosecutors. The Senate and House judiciary committees issued five subpoenas seeking documents and testimony by Taylor, who until six weeks ago was the White House political director, and Miers, the former White House counsel. Bush asserted executive privilege June 28 in refusing to respond to the subpoenas for documents, and the committees responded by demanding that he provide a legal basis and the log.

The log, according to the committees, should describe each document withheld, including its source, subject matter, date and recipients. White House officials viewed it as a backdoor attempt to get sensitive information about deliberations, the sources said.

A White House spokesman declined to comment Saturday. But the White House in recent days has said it has already cooperated extensively with congressional investigators and is now standing on principle.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said Saturday that withholding the legal basis and log would suggest the White House is trying to cover something up or realizes it does not have a reasonable claim. He noted that the administration was willing to give some of the information previously under strict conditions.

“This latest stonewalling attempt raises troubling questions about what the White House is trying to hide by refusing to turn over evidence it was willing to provide months ago as long as the information was shared in secret with no opportunity for Congress to pursue the matter further,” Leahy said through a spokeswoman.

Iraq minister: 140,000 Turkey troops on border

Foreign minister cites Ankara’s concern over Kurdish militants in north Iraq

July 9, 2007

MSNBC

BAGHDAD - Turkey has massed 140,000 soldiers on its border with northern Iraq but so far there have been no violations, Iraq's foreign minister said Monday.

Hoshyar Zebari's comments came amid calls by Turkey's military for the government to give it the green light to carry out military operations in northern Iraqi against the rebel Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK.

"Turkey is building up forces on the border. There are 140,000 soldiers fully armed on the border. We are against any military interference or violation of Iraqi sovereignty," Zebari said during a news conference in Baghdad.

He said that any problem should be solved through dialogue adding that "Turkey's fears are legitimate but such things can be discussed."

The Iraqi government try to diffuse the situation," said Zebari, a Kurd from northern Iraq. "The perfect solution is the withdrawal of the Turkish forces from the borders."

"No one wants a new military conflict in the region. These matters should be solved through dialogue and direct negotiations ... there hasn't been any Turkish military violation until now. There are some artillery shelling and some surveillance by Turkish plane."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19676021/

Where is Barney??----the Presidential Dog.

July 19, 2005

by James P. Boyne

Where is Barney?-- the First Dog. The Presidential Dog.That cute little, black Scottish Terrier.

It’s been a while. I haven’t seen the First Dog in about two  months, at least, now.

What gives?

Poor Barney.

Is he not being walked?

Is no one playing fetch with him?

Is he not being taken to his weekly trip to the First Dog groomer?

I demand an answer.

Barney is why I voted for President Bush.

I feel betrayed.

I’m worried.

About Barney.

The only reason I ever watched the nightly news was to see if Barney was being taken on his daily Presidential walk from the White House to the shiny green Presidential helicopter; and then from the helicopter across the White House lawn back to the White House; and then back out of the White House, across the lawn and into the helicopter again; and over and over and over.

He used to be one of the most exercised dogs in America.

I loved the way President Bush would scoop up Barney in his Presidential arms, salute the on-guard Marine,and carry Barney up the helicopter’s Presidential steps and turn around and give the crowd a Presidential wave.

It’s why I voted for “Presidential” George W. Bush. It was Barney that did it. I voted for Barney.

God, I love that dog.

I don’t care if President Bush spent $300 billion of taxpayer’s money on Iraq and we have nothing to show for it.

I don’t care if we have 70 million Americans with no health insurance; 9 million unemployed; 12 million long term unemployed; over a million jobs outsourced to China and India; a minimum wage of $5.15 an hour (about $10,000 a year); and the fact that almost 8 million Americans have declared bankruptcy in the past five years.

I don’t care.

I miss Barney.

I don’t even much care if 100,000 Iraqis have been killed in Iraq, mostly by Americans.

I try to care, but can’t, about the 18000 Americans that have been killed in Iraq and the 12,000 that have been seriously wounded.

I don’t know a single victim.

I rarely see a single “fallen hero” on TV.

And now I don’t see Barney, who I use to see almost every day, scampering across the White House lawn with the President of the United States of America.

It’s why I voted for him, the President that is, not Barney.

God, I love that dog.

I don’t care if there are 20 million illegal aliens living in the United States and 3 million more sneak across our southern border every year.

Is Barney OK?

I don’t care about creationism vs. evolution, pro-life vs. pro-choice; the Ten Commandments, whether our little one’s should be praying in school, whether we should fly the flag or desecrate it, or who is or who isn’t “born again”.

Barney doesn’t care.

Barney doesn’t have a religion.

How is Barney doing?

That’s all I care about.

I don’t even care about my own personal dilemma.

I don’t care about the fact that I, at 55,have been laid off from my job and  still can’t find a new one after 18 months.

I don’t care about the fact that my health insurance company has dropped me from my policy and that a new policy would cost me over $1500 a month.

Barney, I miss you.

I don’t care if my lifelong employer where I worked for the past 30 years has reneged on my retirement pension leaving me to twist in the wind.

I don’t care if my wife recently ran up $150,000 in medical bills for back surgery and 8 days in the hospital.

I don’t care if I need to spend $1000 a month on prescription medication and have no way to pay for it.

Will we ever know if Barney is safe and warm and happy?

I don’t care if I’m a Vietnam veteran and I’m not even eligible for any health coverage at the VA center (which just closed down anyway).

I don’t even care if my application for personal bankruptcy is approved at the bankruptcy hearing that is scheduled for my wife and I next month.

I just don’t care.

All I can think about is ----how is Barney?

Barney always did what dogs do best.  Nothing.

Damn, I love that dog.

I don’t care if Rove leaked the identity of a CIA undercover agent to Cooper who may have repeated it to Novak who wrote about it in his column after he revealed it to Miller who may have heard it from Libby who did or did not hear it from Cheney  who knew nothing about Plame being the wife of Wilson who wrote about yellowcake uranium not being purchased by Saddam Hussein from Niger.

I don’t care  if the President is not talking because the investigation is not finished because all the facts have not come out and because no one can come forward and tell the truth until it is all resolved by Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor.

Barney probably knows more than anyone about everything that goes on in the White House.

He just isn’t talking. And no one can make him talk.

Where oh where is Barney?

I hope he didn’t get out and run away and get lost.

Doesn’t anyone care but me?

Last week I saw the President on TV walking across the White House lawn with Karl Rove in tow apparently orchestrated to show that the President supports Mr. Rove in this time of tribulation about Plame/Novak/Cooper/Miller, etc.

Scott McClellan was close behind as if being walked on a dog leash by the President.

Barney would have been jealous.

Barney was nowhere in sight.

I’m worried.

I don’t care about the $500 billion deficit, what happened to the $350 tax giveback for the wealthy or the $8 trillion national debt. I can’t care about money at a time like this.

I’m worried about Barney.

Sometimes I think I am being set-up.

I know politics can be sinister and manipulative.

I’ve heard all about “dirty tricks”, leaking to the press, and staged photo-ops. Is this a ploy?

Is information about Barney being withheld to purposely distract me about the plight of our great nation when the scourge of international terrorism and evildoers is challenging us?

Is this a political trick to divert me from concern about issues like the national health care crisis and the economic and financial precipice from which our nation teeters on the edge?

Bush should thank God that Barney can’t be called to testify before the Grand Jury.

If Barney was subpoenaed to testify, the President’s goose would be cooked.

Barney, under oath, and threatened with jail time, would have to spill the beans.

It would be worse than a Cessna flying low and slow directly over the White House.

It would be implosion time for all of the regular, big-wig, special interest parasites who visit the White House.

Barney has taken names, and dogs don’t forget easily.

Barney knows who is a friend of America and who is a foe.

It’s instinctive with dogs. They just know.

If only I knew----about Barney, that is.

If I could be assured that Barney was safe everything would be okay.

All I want is just one more 30-second video clip on TV showing Barney walking proudly across the White House lawn to the shiny green helicopter.

I love that dog.

James Boyne

dboyne@aol.com

Oil may hit $100 a barrel

July 7, 2007

aftenposten.no

A leading Norwegian economist and one of the oil-producing country's major investors think oil prices will keep rising until alternative energy starts paying off. That can mean prices of more than USD 100 a barrel within a few years.

The sun isn't expected to set on oil prices any time soon.

Spot prices for North Sea oil went over USD 74 a barrel on Tuesday. Some analysts think they'll keep rising, as the summer driving season gets underway in both North America and Europe.

Others think they'll fall back, but not banking firm Nordea's chief economist Steinar Juel. Both Juel and industrialist Jens Ulltveit-Moe, now a private investor, contend that prices will rise until alternative energy sources become economically advantageous.

Juel told newspaper Dagens Næringsliv Wednesday that he wouldn't rule out oil prices of more than USD 100 a barrel, a level considered unthinkable just three years ago.

"When we look back, we see that USD 40 a barrel was a prelude to today's USD 70 range," Juel said. "Then USD 70 a barrel can absolutely be a prelude to USD 100 a barrel."

World economic growth, Juel noted, points toward an ongoing need for high oil and energy demand. And the world seems to be living with high oil prices, which so far haven't blocked the growth.

Moreover, he notes, there's little sign of any new large sources of oil coming on line. "I have difficulty seeing where a lot of new oil will come from," Juel told Dagens Næringsliv.

Investor Ulltveit-Moe, a former head of Norway's largest employers' association, agrees, and notes that oil prices will likely approach levels that will make alternative energy more viable. Coal, he notes, is the biggest rival to oil, and the costs of extracting it and cutting its emissions will guide oil prices.

Aftenposten English Web Desk

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/business/article1870492.ece

Pope's move on Latin mass 'a blow to Jews'

July 8, 2007

by Jason Burke in Paris

The Observer

Jewish leaders and community groups criticised Pope Benedict XVI strongly yesterday after the head of the Roman Catholic Church formally removed restrictions on celebrating an old form of the Latin mass which includes prayers calling for the Jews to 'be delivered from their darkness' and converted to Catholicism.

In a highly controversial concession to traditionalist Catholics, Pope Benedict said that he had decided to allow parish priests to celebrate the Latin Tridentine mass if a 'stable group of faithful' request it - though he stressed that he was in no way undoing the reforms of the Sixties Second Vatican Council which allowed the mass to be said in vernacular languages for the first time.

'What earlier generations held as sacred remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful,' Benedict wrote.

However, the older rite's prayers calling on God to 'lift the veil from the eyes' of the Jews and to end 'the blindness of that people so that they may acknowledge the light of your truth, which is Christ' - used just once a year during the Good Friday service - have sparked outrage.

Yesterday the Anti-Defamation League, the American-based Jewish advocacy group, called the papal decision a 'body blow to Catholic-Jewish relations'.

'We are extremely disappointed and deeply offended that nearly 40 years after the Vatican rightly removed insulting anti-Jewish language from the Good Friday mass, it would now permit Catholics to utter such hurtful and insulting words by praying for Jews to be converted,' said Abraham Foxman, the group's national director, in Rome. 'It is the wrong decision at the wrong time. It appears the Vatican has chosen to satisfy a right-wing faction in the church that rejects change and reconciliation.'

Some bishops in France as well as liberal clergy and Catholics elsewhere have expressed concerns that allowing freer use of the Tridentine liturgy would imply a negation of Vatican II, the 1962-65 meetings that modernised the Roman Catholic Church. They also feared it could create divisions in parishes, since two different liturgies would be celebrated.

The liberal French Catholic magazine Temoignage Chretien published an editorial in Latin explaining that it was not concerned about the language in which the mass was celebrated but by 'the view of the outside world held by most supporters of the traditional rite ... of a church that sees itself as the sole holder of the truth. Forty years after the Second Vatican Council, this stand is untenable'.

Benedict has told bishops that such fears are 'unfounded' as the mass celebrated in the vernacular remained the 'normal' form while the older version was an 'extraordinary' one that would probably be sought by relatively few Catholics.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev Federico Lombardi, said the new rules did not 'impose any return to the past, nor any weakening of the authority of the council, nor the authority and responsibility of bishops'.

Benedict was acting in a bid to reach out to the followers of an excommunicated French ultra-traditionalist, the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who split with the Vatican over the introduction of the new mass and other Vatican II reforms. The Vatican excommunicated him in 1988 after he consecrated four bishops without Rome's consent. The bishops were excommunicated as well.

Benedict has been keen to reach a reconciliation with Lefebvre's group, the Society of St Pius X, which has demanded freer use of the old mass as a precondition for normalising relations. It also demands the removal of the excommunication decrees. The group said in a statement that it rejoiced over the document and thanked the pope for it.

In one small village in western France, a church was recently occupied by Catholic traditionalists demanding a mass in Latin. A new priest, who succeeded a conservative who had served the community of 300 for 40 years, had been ordered by the local bishop to end the unauthorised but previously tolerated older rites, sparking a sit-in. Mathieu Mautin, 30, said that for him the older rite 'was very important in [his] life'.

'I want my children to enjoy it too,' Mautin said. 'The liturgy creates a universe that makes the mystery palpable. The fact that the priest faces the altar signifies for us that he is leading the people of God.'

Pope Benedict, who was elected in April 2005, has provoked emotional reaction from other faiths on a number of occasions. He apologised in September last year for offending Muslims after quoting a 14th-century Byzantine emperor who said: 'Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.'

The Pope also sparked bewilderment when he made no mention of anti-Semitism, or the fact that the Nazis killed millions of people because they were Jewish, in a speech last year at Auschwitz. He also failed to acknowledge that there might be some degree of collective responsibility of the German people.

Comment: The Pope should show far more sensitivity towards the Jews. Doesn’t he know how much they have suffered? He should use his influence to get a pardon for the Rosenbergs, Pollard and Libby and persuade Bush to remove the Torah he has hidden next to the Oval Office and put it right out in public view!  BH