|
The
Slaughterhouse Informer
A
Compendiium of Various Official Lies, Business Scandals, Small
Murders, Frauds, and Other Gross Defects of Our Current Political,
Business and Religious Moral Lepers.
Presenting a new magazine that contains material that is not found
elsewhere and is very difficult to post on the Internet. The
‘Voice of the White House’ will appear in each issue containing
material not found on TBR News for very obvious reasons.This
publication will appear once a week, on Wednesday, every week, will
be ten pages in length and is available by subscription only. The
price is $5.00 a month and can be paid via PayPal or by check, sent
to ‘Morris Productions, 3105 E. New Yort St. Ste A2-190, Aurora,
Il 60504.’ If you don’t like it, and Bush supporters can read
the Drudge Report for free, you can cancel at any time.
TBR Ebooks
Civil
insurrection in America and government countermeasures: The official
papers
By
Bradley Moscrip
An
in-depth study of official American plans to construct FEMA
detention centers in America and specific recent U.S. Army domestic
counterinsurgency plans. Here is a sampling of the ebook contents:
Gun
Control by Confiscation
As the American general population is known to be
the most heavily armed in the world, immediately upon the
declaration of Martial Law and the execution by the military of
counterinsurgency programs, it has been determined that the BATF,
will begin the process of rounding up all rifles, pistols and
so-called assault weaponry from the civil population. Lists of gun
collectors obtained from firearms dealers, gun magazine subscription
lists and other sources will be the basis for these mass
confiscations. Gun owners will be supplied documentation by the BATF
showing which pieces have been confiscated so that in the future,
they will be told, they can recover their weapons when the state of
emergency has passed. In actuality, weapons that do not have a high
value or are not suitable for arming loyalist police forces, will be
destroyed by order
This
study is available from tbrnews at
$5.00
by PayPal
The
Voice of the White House
Washington,
D.C., February 26, 2009: “There is an old song about someone
called Hard-Hearted Hannah and her merry pranks and one of the lines
tells us that Hannah even poured water on a drowning man. Now we
have a similar care wherein many, many American (and foreign)
investors are being systematically ripped off on a grand scale by
the manufacturing, merchandising and selling of badly adulterated
investment silver and gold American coins. It is also now known that
Credit Suisse gold bars, and a good deal of bullion European coinage
is also being faked as well as the Canadian Maple leaf and the
famous Krugerrands. All of these counterfeit items are being
currently manufactured in China and sold all over the world as a
hedge investment to millions. These coins, and bars, are made using
laser-cut dies and therefore appear to be perfect. In order to
enhance their profits, the Chinese adulterate both the gold and
silver content of their fakes so that these can be detected by
weighing them. Most collectors of these pieces, however, buy their
investment pieces by mail and cannot weigh their purchases in
advance. I have seen the figures of the numbers of coins, and other
investment precious metals, sold and in this country alone, the
numbers are in the many of millions. This counterfeiting is, of
course, a serious crime but not in China where screwing the
Americans is a great game. Adulterating pet food, toothpaste, milk
and other products to cut their expenses is a well-known trait of
the Celestials and anyone who thinks the innocent government in
Beijing is not fully aware of this is an idiot. If some particularly
nasty story of poisoned food or toys (lead paint) becomes known in
America, the authorities take out a factory owner and shoot him hut
the fun goes on. What these assholes have done is to destroy the
coin market and, like the crooked mortgage brokers and their banking
crime partners, screw the American public to the wall. What is
needed is a good Forest Preserve and lots and lots of rope. As far
as the Chinese are concerned, we should at once block any kind of
Chinese product from entering this country. We should also block the
arrogant and vicious Mexican drug dealers from brazenly setting up
shop on this side of the border. With the Chinese, we can cut off
our trade and with the beaner drug lords, we can capture them and
cut off their heads or other body parts.”
Mass Counterfeiting of American
coins
February
27, 2009
by
Brian Harring
brianharring@yahoo.com
With the
collapsing American economy, many Americans are rushing to invest in
gold; either coins or bar, and also silver. One of the most popular
forms of this investment are American coins.
Where there is a need, there is always someone to fill it and
in this case, the filling consists of
the massive counterfeiting of gold
coins, silver coins, and even
Swiss gold bars in China. Initially,
it appeared they were only faking Morgan dollars, but then it turned
out they were also making $20 Liberty, and Indian Head gold $2.50,
$5, and $10 coins, of all dates. Evidently, this is extremely
easy with today's computer-and-laser-die-cutting technology, and the
fakes are being die-struck in vast quantities, not cast, and
visually at least, are superb copies.
The good news is that these fakes are readily detectable with
a 0.01 - gram scale, as the Chinese in their greed are using lower
carats of gold and lower grades of silver than the genuine coins, to
maximize profit, and thus, in most cases, the fake coins and bars
are lighter than the real ones. In a few cases, the silver coins of
high numismatic interest are actually OVER weight - it appears that
the supply of accurate planchet stock is a major
difficulty for the forgers.
Here are links to a two-part article about this in Coin
World Magazine:
http://www.coinworldonline.com/counterfeits/articles/20081203/counterfeit_1.asp
http://www.coinworldonline.com/counterfeits/articles/20081203/counterfeit_2.asp
Note: They are
even faking PCGS and ANACS slabs!!:
http://www.coinworldonline.com/counterfeits/articles/20081203/counterfeit_3.asp
A friend who has an extremely wealthy friend in Europe (on
the order of several hundreds of millions) asked this person to make
enquiries at his bank. The bank told him candidly that indeed,
the Chinese are also faking sovereigns, half sovereigns, French 20
Franc gold, and various denominations of Nicholas II Russian Rubles,
of all dates, as well as Swiss gold bars. They said any gold bars
they are offered for purchase are both weighed
and the serial numbers checked with the manufacturers. The
Chinese do not know the serial and manufacture date numbering
systems on the gold bars, and so that error is quickly detectable.
The US Secret Service has
just this week been made aware of this problem, which was new to
them, and if they decide to launch an investigation, they have
indicated that while they cannot do anything about the operations in
China, they can, and will, seize any counterfeit US coins they come
across. Dealers in these fakes would also be liable to fines
and jail time. Foreign fakes are not under their purview, but if
that business turns out to be substantial, there could conceivably
be an FBI investigation of fraud in interstate commerce, targeting
companies who are mail-ordering fake foreign coins. Individuals who
have been cheated might also sue their suppliers - in short, this
could turn into a huge mess.
General appearance aside, it is very easy it is to spot fakes
- just with a scale reading to 1/00th of a gram, and a table of the
correct weights and sizes of the coins or bars they are buying. (In
the case of large-size bargold, unless buying from the manufacturer
or a reputable bank, the serial numbers need to be verified, so that
one does not buy a Chinese bar with a lead or mercury
core)
Herewith
a listing of what I have uncovered so far:
1; The U.S .Morgan silver dollar. All dates and all mint
marks;
2: The U.S. gold coins viz the $2.50, $5.00 and $10.00 Indian
head issues
3. The U.S. copper penny viz 1909 S vdb
4. Three gold Imperial Russian roubles from the reign of
Nicholas II
5. A gold 20 franc coin with the head of Napoleon I on the
obverse
6. The South African Krugerrand
7. British sovereigns and half sovereigns of different
monarchs and dates
And in addition, they are also making fake gold bars from the
Credit Suisse people.
It was always considered that numismatics as a relatively
fraud-free area of collecting, but it appears that a coin
collector today has to carry a digital scale around. This
doesn't affect me very much, but I too have wondered at the sudden
appearance of all the Morgan dollars. Fortunately, the ones I have
came down to me from my grandfather, and I'll be very careful
picking up individual pieces that fill blanks.
As for Krugerands and similar gold pieces that are traded for
bullion prices, it is obvious that
the Chinese have lowered the purity and thus debase the value;
otherwise, a fake Krug would have as much gold as a real one.
MORGAN
SILVER DOLLARS (1878-1921)

|
Date
|
Mintage
for
Circulation
|
Mintage
of
Proofs
|
Notes
|
|
1878
|
10,500,000
|
750
|
Major
varieties include the 8 Tail Feathers reverse, 7 Tail
Feathers reverse, 7/8 Tail Feathers reverse and Reverse of
1879. Among Proofs, the 1878 7 Tail Feathers, Reverse
of 1879 is the rarest.
|
|
1878-CC
|
2,212,000
|
0
|
|
|
1878-S
|
9,774,000
|
0
|
|
|
1879
|
14,806,000
|
1,100
|
|
|
1879-CC
|
756,000
|
0
|
Found
with Clear and Capped (rusted) mintmarks.
|
|
1879-O
|
2,887,000
|
est.
12
|
|
|
1879-S
|
9,110,000
|
0
|
|
|
1880
|
12,600,000
|
1,355
|
|
|
1880-CC
|
591,000
|
0
|
|
|
1880-O
|
5,305,000
|
0
|
|
|
1880-S
|
8,900,000
|
0
|
|
|
1881
|
9,162,991
|
984
|
|
|
1881-CC
|
296,000
|
0
|
|
|
1881-O
|
5,708,000
|
0
|
|
|
1881-S
|
12,760,000
|
0
|
|
|
1882
|
11,100,000
|
1,100
|
|
|
1882-CC
|
1,133,000
|
0
|
|
|
1882-O
|
6,090,000
|
0
|
Look
for the rare O/S variety.
|
|
1882-S
|
9,250,000
|
0
|
|
|
1883
|
12,290,000
|
1,039
|
|
|
1883-CC
|
1,204,000
|
0
|
|
|
1883-O
|
8,725,000
|
est.
12
|
|
|
1883-S
|
6,250,000
|
0
|
|
|
1884
|
14,070,000
|
875
|
|
|
1884-CC
|
1,136,000
|
3
known
|
|
|
1884-O
|
9,730,000
|
Unique
|
|
|
1884-S
|
3,200,000
|
0
|
|
|
1885
|
17,787,000
|
930
|
|
|
1885-CC
|
228,000
|
0
|
|
|
1885-O
|
9,185,000
|
0
|
|
|
1885-S
|
1,497,000
|
0
|
|
|
1886
|
19,963,000
|
886
|
|
|
1886-O
|
10,710,000
|
0
|
|
|
1886-S
|
750,000
|
0
|
|
|
1887
|
20,290,000
|
710
|
|
|
1887-O
|
11,550,000
|
0
|
Look
for the rare 1887/6-O overdate.
|
|
1887-S
|
1,771,000
|
0
|
|
|
1888
|
19,183,000
|
832
|
|
|
1888-O
|
12,150,000
|
0
|
|
| 1888-S
|
657,000
|
0
|
|
|
1889
|
21,726,000
|
811
|
|
|
1889-CC
|
350,000
|
0
|
Rare,
key date issue.
|
|
1889-O
|
11,875,000
|
0
|
|
|
1889-S
|
700,000
|
0
|
|
|
1890
|
16,802,000
|
590
|
|
|
1890-CC
|
2,309,041
|
0
|
|
|
1890-O
|
10,701,100
|
0
|
|
|
1890-S
|
8,230,373
|
0
|
|
|
1891
|
8,693,556
|
650
|
|
|
1891-CC
|
1,618,000
|
0
|
|
|
1891-O
|
7,954,529
|
0
|
|
|
1891-S
|
5,296,000
|
0
|
|
|
1892
|
1,036,000
|
1,245
|
|
|
1892-CC
|
1,352,000
|
0
|
|
|
1892-O
|
2,744,000
|
0
|
|
|
1892-S
|
1,200,000
|
0
|
|
|
1893
|
378,000
|
792
|
|
|
1893-CC
|
677,000
|
est.
12
|
|
|
1893-O
|
300,000
|
0
|
|
|
1893-S
|
100,000
|
0
|
Rare
in all grades.
|
|
1894
|
110,000
|
972
|
Not
as rare as the mintage suggests, but still very popular
because it "looks" rare.
|
|
1894-O
|
1,723,000
|
0
|
|
|
1894-S
|
1,260,000
|
0
|
|
|
1895
|
12,000
|
880
|
None
of the circulation strikes has ever been seen...experts
believe they were all melted down
|
|
1895-O
|
450,000
|
0
|
|
|
1895-S
|
400,000
|
0
|
|
|
1896
|
9,976,000
|
762
|
|
|
1896-O
|
4,900,000
|
0
|
|
|
1896-S
|
5,000,000
|
0
|
|
|
1897
|
2,822,000
|
731
|
|
|
1897-O
|
4,004,000
|
0
|
|
|
1897-S
|
5,825,000
|
0
|
|
|
1898
|
5,884,000
|
735
|
|
|
1898-O
|
4,400,000
|
0
|
|
|
1898-S
|
4,102,000
|
0
|
|
|
1899
|
330,000
|
846
|
|
|
1899-O
|
12,290,000
|
0
|
|
|
1899-S
|
2,562,000
|
0
|
|
|
1900
|
8,830,000
|
912
|
|
|
1900-O
|
12,590,000
|
0
|
|
|
1900-S
|
3,540,000
|
0
|
|
|
1901
|
6,962,000
|
813
|
|
|
1901-O
|
13,320,000
|
0
|
|
|
1901-S
|
2,284,000
|
0
|
|
|
1902
|
7,994,000
|
777
|
|
|
1902-O
|
8,636,000
|
0
|
|
|
1902-S
|
1,530,000
|
0
|
|
|
1903
|
4,652,000
|
755
|
|
|
1903-O
|
4,450,000
|
0
|
|
|
1903-S
|
1,241,000
|
0
|
|
|
1904
|
2,788,000
|
650
|
|
|
1904-O
|
3,720,000
|
0
|
|
|
1904-S
|
2,304,000
|
0
|
|
|
1921
|
44,690,000
|
est.
250
|
Proofs
were made on numismatist Farran Zerbe's behalf, followed by
more made for Henry Chapman.
|
|
1921-D
|
20,345,000
|
0
|
|
|
1921-S
|
21,695,000
|
Rumored
to exist
|
Supposedly,
Proofs were made on Farran Zerbe's behalf in 1921.
|
Note:
It is very important to understand that most of these coins
were removed from circulation and melted down for their silver
content. Therefore, the enormous numbers of Morgan dollars,
“recently discovered, in mint condition, in an old vault,” is
only a predictable fabrication designed to sell the fakes to the
gullible.
Official
specifications, including weight of originals
Morgan
Dollars
Minted:
1878 to 1904, 1921
Designer: George T. Morgan
Gross weight: 26.73 grams
Composition: .900 silver/.100 copper
Net silver content: 0.77344 oz.
Size: 38.1 mm diameter
Indian
Head $2.50 gold coin
Designer
Bela Lyon Pratt
Gross
weight: 4.18 grams
Net
Weight .12094 oz pure gold
Composition:
.900 gold, 100 copper
Diameter:
18 mm, reeded edge
Mints:
Philadelphia 1908-1915,
1926-1929
Denver
1911, 1914, 1925
Indian
head $5.00 gold coin
Designer:
Bela Lyon Pratt
Gross
weight: 8.359 grams
Gold
content: 0.24187 oz
Composition:
90% gold, 10% copper
Diameter:
21.6 mm
Dates:
1908-16m, 1929
Reeded
edge
Mints:
Denver
(1908-11; 1914), Philadelphia (1908-15; 1929), San Francisco
(1908-16
Indian
head $10.00 gold
Designer:
Augustus Saint-Gaudens
Gross
weight: 16.718 grams
Net
weight: .48375 oz pure gold
Composition:
.900 gold, 100 copper
Diameter:
27 mm, Raised stars on edge
Mints:
Philadelphia 1907-1933,
San Francisco 1908-1930
Denver:
1908-1914
`While many of these fake coins are widely advertised in the
American prnit and television media, many are also sold on eBay
These single-coin auctions are usually listed with a starting
price of 5 or 10 cents, and they usually close around those prices
when the swindler gets
a buyer. These fake coins cost the Chinese about 50 cents to make
but the swindlers make most of their profit from the shipping
expense they collect from their victims.
This is a common practice with China-based sellers on eBay.
They sell the counterfeit item very cheaply, but then charge as much
as $70 or more for shipping. Doing this serves two useful functions.
First, their Final Value Fee expense is minimal, since eBay bases
this fee on the auction’s
closing price. Secondly, if an item is returned to the seller for
some reason, the buyer can only recover that minimal bid amount
since shipping and handling is typically nonrefundable.
Counterfeiting
significant to China’s overall economy
by Susan Headley
Special to Coin World
The counterfeiting of
general goods and infringement of intellectual rights (such as
software piracy) in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) comprises
a significant portion of China’s overall economy. Consider these
facts:
- In 2006, an estimated 8
percent of China’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was generated from
counterfeiting.
- The PRC’s own State
Council Research and Development Center estimated that there were
$19 billion to $24 billion worth of counterfeit goods flooding
China’s economy in 2001.
- Brand owners estimated
that 15 to 20 percent of all well-known brands in the PRC are
counterfeit.
- Up to 80 percent of all
worldwide counterfeiting is done in China, according to some
estimates.
- In 2005, U.S. Customs
seized $93 million worth of counterfeit and infringing goods, nearly
70 percent of which came from China (and this is only what Customs
actually caught entering the country, which is probably a small
percentage of the total).
- The manufacture of
counterfeits is primarily centered in the two southern Chinese
provinces of Fujian and Guangdong.
The
Long Arm of the Lawless
February
25, 2009
by Bruce
Berman
bruce@bruceberman.com
Last
week we discussed the impact that crime, and specifically
kidnapping, has
been having on Mexican citizens and foreigners visiting or living in
Mexico. We
pointed out that there is almost no area of Mexico immune from the
crime and violence.
As if on cue, on the night of Feb. 21 a group of heavily armed men
threw
two grenades at a police building in Zihuatanejo, Guerrero state,
wounding at
least five people. Zihuatanejo is a normally quiet beach resort just
north of Acapulco;
the attack has caused the town's entire police force to go on
strike.
(Police strikes, or threats of strikes, are not uncommon in Mexico.)
Mexican
police have regularly been targeted by drug cartels, with police
officials
even having been forced to seek safety in the United States, but
such incidents
have occurred most frequently in areas of high cartel activity like
Veracruz
state or Palomas. The Zihuatanejo incident is proof of the
pervasiveness
of violence in Mexico, and demonstrates the impact that such
violence
quickly can have on an area generally considered safe.
Significantly,
the impact of violent Mexican criminals stretches far
beyond
Mexico itself. In recent weeks, Mexican criminals have been involved
in killings
in Argentina, Peru and Guatemala, and Mexican criminals have been
arrested
as far away as Italy and Spain. Their impact -- and the extreme
violence
they embrace -- is therefore not limited to Mexico or even just to
Latin
America. For some years now, STRATFOR has discussed the threat that
Mexican
cartel violence could spread to the United States, and we have
chronicled
the spread of such violence to the U.S.-Mexican border and beyond.
Traditionally,
Mexican drug-trafficking organizations had focused largely
on
the transfer of narcotics through Mexico. Once the South American
cartels encountered
serious problems bringing narcotics directly into the United States,
they
began to focus more on transporting the narcotics to Mexico. From
that point,
the Mexican cartels transported them north and then handed them off
to U.S.
street gangs and other organizations, which handled much of the
narcotics distribution
inside the United States. In recent years, however, these Mexican
groups
have grown in power and have begun to take greater control of the
entire narcotics-trafficking
supply chain.
With greater control comes greater profitability as the
percentages demanded
by middlemen are cut out. The Mexican cartels have worked to have a
greater
presence in Central and South America, and now import from South
America into
Mexico an increasing percentage of the products they sell. They are
also diversifying
their routes and have gone global; they now even traffic their
wares
to Europe. At the same time, Mexican drug-trafficking organizations
also have
increased their distribution operations inside the United States to
expand their
profits even further. As these Mexican organizations continue to
spread
beyond
the border areas, their profits and power will extend even further
– and they
will bring their culture of violence to new areas.
Burned
in Phoenix
The
spillover of violence from Mexico began some time ago in border
towns like
Laredo and El Paso in Texas, where merchants and wealthy families
face extortion
and kidnapping threats from Mexican gangs, and where drug dealers
who refuse
to pay "taxes" to Mexican cartel bosses are gunned down.
But
now,
the threat posed by Mexican criminals is beginning to spread north
from the U.S.-Mexican
border. One location that has felt this expanding threat most
acutely
is Phoenix, some 185 miles north of the border. Some sensational
cases have
highlighted the increased threat in Phoenix, such as a June 2008
armed
assault
in which a group of heavily armed cartel gunmen dressed like a
Phoenix Police
Department tactical team fired more than 100 rounds into a residence
during
the targeted killing of a Jamaican drug dealer who had
double-crossed a Mexican
cartel. We have also observed cartel-related violence in places like
Dallas
and Austin, Texas. But Phoenix has been the hardest hit.
Narcotics
smuggling and drug-related assassinations are not the only thing
the
Mexican criminals have brought to Phoenix. Other criminal gangs have
been heavily
involved in human smuggling, arms smuggling, money laundering and
other crimes.
Due to the confluence of these Mexican criminal gangs, Phoenix has
now become
the kidnapping-for-ransom capital of the United States. According to
a
Phoenix
Police Department source, the department received 368 kidnapping
reports last
year. As we discussed last week, kidnapping is a highly
underreported crime in
places such as Mexico, making it very difficult to measure
accurately. Based upon
experience with kidnapping statistics in other parts of the world
--specifically Latin America -- it would not be unreasonable to
assume that there were at least as many unreported kidnappings in
Phoenix as there are reported
kidnappings.
At
present, the kidnapping environment in the United States is very
different
from that of Mexico, Guatemala or Colombia. In those countries,
kidnapping
runs rampant and has become a well-developed industry with a
substantial
established infrastructure. Police corruption and incompetence
ensures
that kidnappers are rarely caught or successfully prosecuted.
A
variety of motives can lie behind kidnappings. In the United States,
crime
statistics demonstrate that motives such as sexual exploitation,
custody disputes
and short-term kidnapping for robbery have far surpassed the number
of reported
kidnappings conducted for ransom. In places like Mexico, kidnapping
for
ransom
is much more common.
The
FBI handles kidnapping investigations in the United States. It has
developed
highly sophisticated teams of agents and resources to devote to
investigating
this type of crime. Local police departments are also far more
proficient
and professional in the United States than in Mexico. Because of the
advanced
capabilities of law enforcement in the United States, the
overwhelming majority
of criminals involved in kidnapping-for-ransom cases reported to
police-- between 95 percent and 98 percent -- are caught and
convicted. There are also stiff
federal penalties for kidnapping. Because of this, kidnapping for
ransom
has
become a relatively rare crime in the United States.
Most
kidnapping for ransom that does happen in the United States occurs
within
immigrant communities. In these cases, the perpetrators and victims
belong
to the same immigrant group (e.g., Chinese Triad gangs kidnapping
the families of Chinese businesspeople, or Haitian criminals
kidnapping Haitian immigrants)
-- which is what is happening in Phoenix. The vast majority of
the368 known kidnapping victims in Phoenix are Mexican and Central
American immigrants
who are being victimized by Mexican or Mexican-American criminals.
The
problem in Phoenix involves two main types of kidnapping. One is
theabduction of drug dealers or their children, the other is the
abduction of illegal
aliens.
Drug-related
kidnappings often are not strict kidnappings for ransom per
se.
Instead, they are intended to force the drug dealer to repay a debt
to the drug
trafficking organization that ordered the kidnapping.
Non
drug-related kidnappings are very different from traditional
kidnappings
in Mexico or the United States, in which a high-value target is
abducted
and held for a large ransom. Instead, some of the gangs operating in
Phoenix
are basing their business model on volume, and are willing to hold a
large
number of victims for a much smaller individual pay out. Reports
have emerged
of kidnapping gangs in Phoenix carjacking entire vans full of
illegal immigrants
away from the coyote smuggling them into the United States. The
kidnappers
then transport the illegal immigrants to a safe house, where they
are held
captive in squalid conditions -- and often tortured or sexually
assaulted with
a family member listening in on the phone -- to coerce the victims'
family
members in the United States or Mexico to pay the ransom for their
release.
There are also reports of the gangs picking up vehicles full of
victims at
day labor sites and then transporting them to the kidnapping safe
house rather than to the purported work site.
Drug-related
kidnappings are less frequent than the nondrug-related
abduction
of illegal immigrants, but in both types of abductions, the victims
are
not likely to seek police assistance due to their immigration status
or their
involvement in illegal activity. This strongly suggests the
kidnapping problem
greatly exceeds the number of cases reported to police.
Implications
for the United States
The kidnapping gangs in Phoenix that target illegal
immigrants have found their
chosen crime to be lucrative and relatively risk-free. If the flow
of illegal
immigrants had continued at high levels, there is very little doubt
the kidnappers'
operations would have continued as they have for the past few
years.
The current economic downturn, however, means the flow of illegal
immigrants
has begun to slow -- and by some accounts has even begun to reverse.
(Reports
suggest many Mexicans are returning home after being unable to find
jobs
in the United States.)
This
reduction in the pool of targets means that we might be fast
approaching
a point where these groups, which have become accustomed to
kidnapping
as a source of easy money -- and their primary source of income --
might
be forced to change their method of operating to make a living.
While some might
pursue other types of criminal activity, some might well decide to
diversify
their pool of victims. Watching for this shift in targeting is of
critical
importance. Were some of these gangs to begin targeting U.S.
citizens rather
than just criminals or illegal immigrants, a tremendous panic would
ensue,
along with demands to catch the perpetrators.
Such
a shift would bring a huge amount of law enforcement pressure onto
the
kidnapping gangs, to include the FBI. While the FBI is fairly
hard-pressed for
resources given its heavy counterterrorism, foreign
counterintelligence and white-collar
crime caseload, it almost certainly would be able to reassign the
resources
needed to respond to such kidnappings in the face of publicity and a
public
outcry. Such a law enforcement effort could neutralize these gangs
fairly quickly,
but probably not quickly enough to prevent any victims from being
abducted
or harmed.
Since criminal groups are not comprised of fools alone, at
least some of these
groups will realize that targeting soccer moms will bring an
avalanche of law
enforcement attention upon them. Therefore, it is very likely that
if kidnapping
targets become harder to find in Phoenix -- or if the law
enforcement
environment
becomes too hostile due to the growing realization of this problem
--
then the groups may shift geography rather than targeting criteria.
In such a scenario,
professional kidnapping gangs from Phoenix might migrate to other
locations
with large communities of Latin American illegal immigrants to
victimize.
Some of these locations could be relatively close to the Mexican
border
like Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, San Diego or Los Angeles, though
they could
also include locations farther inland like Chicago, Atlanta, New
York, or even
the communities around meat and poultry packing plants in the
Midwest and mid-Atlantic
states. Such a migration of ethnic criminals
would
not be unprecedented: Chinese Triad groups from New York for some
time
have traveled elsewhere on the East Coast, like Atlanta, to engage
in
extortion
and kidnapping against Chinese businessmen there.
The issue of Mexican drug-traffic organizations kidnapping in
the United States merits careful attention, especially since
criminal gangs in other areasof the country could start imitating
the tactics of the Phoenix gangs.
Comment:
There is one certain solution to this dangerous and growing problem.
General Stonewall Jackson said it best: “Kill them. Kill them
all.” If these swine and their fellow-travelers are caught, take
them out into the nearby desert, castrate them, shoot them in the
stomach and leave them for the buzzards. You could pay eager
Americans a bounty for testicles…ears don’t count. BH
SECRECY
NEWS
from the
FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2009, Issue No. 20
February 27, 2009
COURT FAVORS ATTORNEY'S
RIGHT TO CLASSIFIED INFO
A federal court this
week said that litigants have a First Amendment right to provide
classified information to their attorneys when doing so is necessary
to protect their interests. The ruling is implicitly at odds
with a common government practice of denying attorneys access to
classified information in Freedom of Information Act cases,
pre-publication review disputes, and other matters.
There is a "First Amendment right to share [classified]
information with an attorney when such sharing is necessary for an
attorney to advise his client of his rights," wrote
Judge Gladys Kessler (pdf) of the DC District Court.
The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by former Defense
Intelligence Agency employee Anthony Shaffer against the DIA in
connection with the controversial intelligence program known as Able
Danger. DIA sought to bar Shaffer from providing classified
information about the program to his attorney, Mark S. Zaid, even
though he holds a security clearance. Mr. Zaid challenged the
denial, and the court found merit in his complaint.
"Without knowing all that his client, and the
Defendants, know, Plaintiff Shaffer's counsel cannot be prepared to
adequately represent his client's interests," Judge
Kessler concluded.
Executive branch agencies have frequently barred attorneys
from access to classified information in civil litigation,
effectively driving a wedge between the litigant and his counsel,
particularly in disputes involving prepublication review of
manuscripts that are said to contain classified information.
"I have faced this issue numerous times," Mr. Zaid said.
The new ruling
may make it harder to continue that practice. (See more from
the Legal Times blog here.)
FOCUS ON FUSION CENTERS
The Department of Homeland Security has produced a new "Concept
of Operations" (pdf) to define how the Department will
support and oversee the network of dozens of "fusion
centers" that have been established around the country.
The fusion centers are intended to promote a collaborative approach
among federal, state and local authorities to combating terrorism
and criminal activity.
Preparation of the new DHS Concept of Operations was required
by the "9/11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007."
The document has not been formally released, but a copy was obtained
by Secrecy News. See "Interaction
with State and Local Fusion Centers: Concept of Operations,"
December 2008.
The Concept of Operations is programmatic rather than
descriptive. It explains the intended operation of the fusion
center system, not how (or whether) it works in practice-- a topic
on which there are conflicting views.
"Despite their lofty claims, federal officials are
misleading you if they have caused you to believe that fusion
centers are actually 'fusing' any data, that interdepartmental
systems in DOJ, DHS, or DOD are integrating anything but
inconsequential records, or that nationwide networks like N-DEX and
HSDN are systematically transporting data that is being used by
state and local police departments," said former U.S. Attorney John
McKay (pdf) at a September 24, 2008 hearing. "If you
accept these assertions at face value, you will be
misinformed."
From another perspective, there is "not enough
terrorism" to justify the creation and maintenance of the
fusion center system. "There is, more often than not,
insufficient purely 'terrorist' activity to support a
multi-jurisdictional and multi-governmental level fusion center that
exclusively processes terrorist activity," according to
Sacramento police officer Milton Nenneman. ("Fusion
Centers Face 'Insufficient' Terrorist Activity," Secrecy
News, June 3, 2008).
Others take a more favorable view. "I would say
that fusion centers have emerged as what may be the most significant
change in the structural landscape of criminal intelligence in at
least the past 25 years," said Russell
M. Porter (pdf), director of the Iowa State fusion center.
Some of these issues were addressed in a recently published
Senate hearing record. See "Focus
on Fusion Centers: A Progress Report," hearing before the
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, April
17, 2008.
The most widely shared official view seems to be that fusion
centers offer significant advantages, especially to law enforcement
agencies, but that they are still far from fulfilling their
potential or optimizing their utility. A similar view was
expressed recently by the DHS Office of Inspector General in "DHS'
Role in State and Local Fusion Centers is Evolving" (pdf),
December 10, 2008.
The ACLU discussed its view of "What's
Wrong with Fusion Centers" in December 2007 (with a July
2008 update).
The Electronic Privacy Information Center provides related
background, resources and critical commentary here.
VARIOUS ITEMS
The release of President Obama's first Presidential
Policy Directive on "Organization of the National Security
System" was reported by Karen DeYoung in the Washington
Post and by Josh Gerstein in Politico.
"Secretary of Defense Robert Gates lifted a blanket ban
on news media coverage of the honor guard ceremonies that mark the
return of military casualties from abroad," the National
Security Archive noted.
The unreleased Bush Administration documents that are most
coveted by reporters, civil libertarians, and others are discussed
in "Opening
the Files on Bush's Secrets" by Jon Wiener in The Nation,
March 16, 2009.
A new Army Field Manual on "Electronic
Warfare in Operations" (pdf) has been issued as part of
"an overall effort by the Army to rebuild its internal
Electronic Warfare capability." It also serves as a
useful primer on the subject. The new Field Manual, FM 3-36,
has been approved for unrestricted release.
A new trial date has been set in the "AIPAC
Case," in which two former employees of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee are charged with improperly receiving and
transmitting classified national defense information. The new
date is May 27, 2009.
PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS, AND MORE FROM CRS
Noteworthy new and updated reports from the Congressional
Research Service that have not been made readily available to the
public include the following (all pdf).
"Presidential
Records: Issues for the 111th Congress," February 17, 2009.
"F-35
Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program: Background, Status,
and Issues," updated February 17, 2009.
"Strategic
Arms Control After START: Issues and Options," updated
February 12, 2009.
"Herring
v. United States: Extension of the Good-Faith Exception to the
Exclusionary Rule in Fourth Amendment Cases," February 2,
2009.
"U.S.
Motor Vehicle Industry: Federal Financial Assistance and
Restructuring," January 30, 2009.
"India-U.S.
Relations," updated January 30, 2009.
"Compulsory
DNA Collection: A Fourth Amendment Analysis," updated
January 23, 2009.
Conversations
with the Crow: Part 70
Editor’s
note: When this series was prepared, a number of conversations were
deliberately redacted because they were either very personal in
nature or, more important, contained specific material which we felt
might have considerable impact and present potential danger in
publication. Now that all of the conversations are being readied for
publication, along with illustrative specific notes, we are
publishing many of the hitherto off-limits examples. Enjoy
them!
On October 8th, 2000, Robert Trumbull Crowley, once a leader
of the CIA's Clandestine Operations Division, died in a Washington
hospital of heart failure and the end effects of Alzheimer's
Disease. Before the late Assistant Director Crowley was cold, Joseph
Trento, a writer of light-weight books on the CIA, descended on
Crowley's widow at her town house on Cathedral Hill Drive in
Washington and hauled away over fifty boxes of Crowley's CIA files.
Once Trento had his new find secure in his house in Front
Royal , Virginia, he called a well-known Washington fix lawyer with
the news of his success in securing what the CIA had always
considered to be a potential major embarrassment. Three months
before, July 20th of that year, retired Marine Corps colonel William
R. Corson, and an associate of Crowley, died of emphysema and lung
cancer at a hospital in Bethesda, Md.
After Corson's death, Trento and a well-known Washington
fix-lawyer went to Corson's bank, got into his safe deposit box and
removed a manuscript entitled 'Zipper.' This manuscript, which dealt
with Crowley's involvement in the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, vanished into a CIA burn-bag and the matter was considered
to be closed forever.
The small group
of CIA officials gathered at Trento's house to search through the
Crowley papers, looking for documents that must not become public. A
few were found but, to their consternation, a significant number of
files Crowley was known to have had in his possession had simply
vanished.
When published material concerning the CIA's actions against
Kennedy became public in 2002, it was discovered to the CIA's
horror, that the missing documents had been sent by an increasingly
erratic Crowley to another person and these missing papers included
devastating material on the CIA's activities in South East Asia to
include drug running, money laundering and the maintenance of the
notorious 'Regional Interrogation Centers' in Viet Nam and, worse
still, the Zipper files proving the CIA’s active organization of
the assassination of President John Kennedy..
A massive, preemptive disinformation campaign was readied,
using government-friendly bloggers, CIA-paid "historians"
and others, in the event that anything from this file ever surfaced.
The best-laid plans often go astray and in this case, one of the
compliant historians, a former government librarian who fancied
himself a serious writer, began to tell his friends about the CIA
plan to kill Kennedy and eventually, word of this began to leak out
into the outside world.
The originals had vanished and an extensive search was
conducted by the FBI and CIA operatives but without success.
Crowley's survivors, his aged wife and son, were interviewed
extensively by the FBI and instructed to minimize any discussion of
highly damaging CIA files that Crowley had, illegally,
removed from Langley when he retired. Crowley had been a close
friend of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s notorious head of
Counterintelligence. When Angleton was sacked by
DCI William Colby in December of 1974, Crowley and Angleton
conspired to secretly
remove Angleton’s most sensitive secret files our of the agency.
Crowley did the same thing right
before his own retirement , secretly removing thousands of pages
of classified information that covered his entire agency
career.
Known as “The Crow” within the agency, Robert T. Crowley
joined the CIA at its inception and spent his entire career in the
Directorate of Plans, also know as the “Department of Dirty
Tricks,”: Crowley was one of the tallest man ever to work at the
CIA. Born in 1924 and raised in Chicago, Crowley grew to six and a
half feet when he entered the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in
N.Y. as a cadet in 1943 in the class of 1946. He never graduated,
having enlisted in the Army, serving in the Pacific during World War
II. He retired from the Army Reserve in 1986 as a lieutenant
colonel. According to a book he authored with his friend and
colleague, William Corson, Crowley’s career included service in
military intelligence and Naval Intelligence, before joining the CIA
at inception in 1947. His entire career at the agency was spent
within the Directorate of Plans in covert operations. Before his
retirement, Bob Crowley became assistant deputy director for
operations, the second-in-command in the Clandestine Directorate of
Operations.
One of Crowley’s first major assignments within the agency
was to assist in the recruitment and management of prominent World
War II Nazis, especially those with advanced intelligence
experience. One of the CIA’s major recruitment coups was Heinrich
Mueller, once head of Hitler’s Gestapo who had fled to Switzerland
after the collapse of the Third Reich and worked as an
anti-Communist expert for Masson of Swiss counterintelligence.
Mueller was initially hired by Colonel James Critchfield of the CIA,
who was running the Gehlen Organization out of Pullach in
southern Germany. Crowley eventually came to despise Critchfield but
the colonel was totally unaware of this, to his later dismay.
Crowley’s real expertise within the agency was the Soviet
KGB. One of his main jobs throughout his career was acting as the
agency liaison with corporations like ITT, which the CIA often used
as fronts for moving large amounts of cash off their books. He was
deeply involved in the efforts by the U.S. to overthrow the
democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile,
which eventually got him into legal problems with regard to
investigations of the U.S. government’s grand jury where he has
perjured himself in an agency cover-up
After
his retirement, Crowley began to search for someone who might be
able to write a competent history of his career. His first choice
fell on British author John Costello (author of Ten Days to
Destiny, The Pacific War and other works) but, discovering that
Costello was a very aggressive homosexual, he dropped him and
tentatively turned to Joseph Trento who had assisted Crowley and
William Corson in writing a book on the KGB. When Crowley discovered
that Trento had an ambiguous and probably cooperative relationship
with the CIA, he began to distrust him and continued his search for
an author.
Bob
Crowley first contacted Gregory Douglas
in 1993 when he
found out from John Costello that Douglas was about to publish his
first book on Heinrich Mueller, the former head of the Gestapo who
had become a secret, long-time asset to the CIA. Crowley contacted
Douglas and they began a series of long and often very informative
telephone conversations that lasted for four years. . In 1996,
Crowley , Crowley told Douglas
that he believed him to be the person that should ultimately
tell Crowley’s story but only after Crowley’s death. Douglas,
for his part, became so entranced with some of the material that
Crowley began to share with him that he secretly began to record
their conversations, later transcribing them word for word, planning
to incorporate some, or all, of the material in later publications.
In
1998, when Crowley was slated to go into the hospital for
exploratory surgery, he
had his son, Greg, ship two large foot lockers of documents to
Douglas with the caveat that they were not to be opened until after
Crowley’s death. These documents, totaled an astonishing 15,000 pages of CIA classified files involving
many covert operations, both foreign and domestic, during the Cold
War.
After
Crowley’s death and Trento’s raid on the Crowley files, huge
gaps were subsequently discovered by horrified CIA officials and
when Crowley’s friends mentioned Gregory Douglas, it was
discovered that Crowley’s son had shipped two large boxes to
Douglas. No one knew their contents but because Douglas was viewed
as an uncontrollable loose cannon who had done considerable damage
to the CIA’s reputation by his on-going publication of the history
of Gestapo-Mueller, they bent every effort both to identify the
missing files and make some effort to retrieve them before Douglas
made any use of them.
All of this furor eventually came to the attention of Dr.
Peter Janney, a Massachusetts clinical psychologist and son of
Wistar Janney, another career senior CIA official, colleague of not
only Bob Crowley but Cord Meyer, Richard Helms, Jim Angleton and
others. Janney was working on a book concerning the murder of Mary
Pinchot Meyer, former wife of Cord Meyer, a high-level CIA official,
and later the mistress of President John F. Kennedy.
Douglas had authored a book, ‘Regicide’ which
dealt with Crowley’s part in the Kennedy assassination and he
obviously had access to at least some of Crowley’s papers. Janney
was very well connected inside the CIA’s higher levels and when he
discovered that Douglas had indeed known, and had often spoken with,
Crowley and that after Crowley’s death, the FBI had descended on
Crowley’s widow and son, warning them to never speak with Douglas
about anything, he contacted Douglas and finally obtained from him a
number of original documents, including the originals of the
transcribed conversations with Robert Crowley.
In spite of the burn bags, the top secret safes and the
vigilance of the CIA to keep its own secrets, the truth has an
embarrassing and often very fatal habit of emerging, albeit decades
later.
While CIA drug running , money-launderings and brutal
assassinations are very often strongly rumored and suspected, it has
so far not been possible to actually pin them down but it is more
than possible that the publication of the transcribed and detailed
Crowley-Douglas conversations will do a great deal towards
accomplishing this.
These many transcribed conversations are relatively short
because Crowley was a man who tired easily but they make excellent
reading. There is an interesting admixture of shocking revelations
on the part of the retired CIA official and often rampant
anti-social (and very entertaining) activities on the part of
Douglas but readers of this new and on-going series are gently
reminded to always look for the truth in the jest!
Conversation 70
Date:
Tuesday July 30, 1996
Commenced:
8:30 AM CST
Concluded:
8:55 AM CST
GD:
Good morning, Robert.
RTC:
And the same to you, Gregory.
GD:
Robert, I know you were not in the CIA’s technical branch but I
often wonder when I am on the phone, am I being listened to?
RTC: You don’t have to be from the technical people to know the
answer to that one. It’s not so much that you are being snooped on
but that you can be observed by almost anyone at any time. We
listened in on people and opened mail. That’s the reason why Jim
was sacked but that was only an excuse. He was getting crazy. But as
far as the telephone is concerned, yes, you could be listened to at
any time. It’s not a bug on your phone so much as full and
complete cooperation by the telephone people with various agencies.
We did it, the FBI and the NSA do it and probably others as well.
Your mail can be opened, addresses copied and so on. For instance,
if you have a private Swiss bank account, we have the postal people
copy down and forward to us the cover of any letter sent by a Swiss
bank to an American addressee. We don’t have to open the letter to
know it’s a monthly bank statement. And then we know where your
account is. And the NSA listen in on each and every phone call
overseas. You see, they tap into the communications satellites. Of
course there are huge numbers of calls every day so their computers
are set to pick out certain words. Like Abu Nidal for instance. Once
a key word comes up, the conversation is taped and listened to
later.
GD:
And the television sets can be used as a monitoring device but only
if they’re connected to the cable TV system.
RTC:
I’ve heard that but then I rarely watch the garbage on television.
GD:
You can circumvent that simply by disconnecting your set from the
cable system. Just take out the plug. Put it back later. Or, what I
would do, would be to hold a really sizzling but totally fake
disinformation conversation right in front of the set. You
know…’the Russians really pay well for that information…’
and also ‘ yes the entire building has been mined. One push of a
button and we can make the front pages of every newspaper in the
world.’ Can you imagine the uproar on the other end? Of course you
never are specific and just enough to drive them into a frenzy.
I’ve done this a number of times but only twice did I ever find
out what a huge stink I caused. Loved it then and I love it now.
Oh yes, Bill told me the other day that he saved Bobby Inman
from exposure once. When I asked him from what, he shut down. Can
you comment on this?
RTC:
Probably the homosexual issue. They are very sensitive to that one.
GD:
Why? And is Inman a faggot?
RTC:
Now, now, I’ll let Bill discuss this with you. My information
would only be second hand. And it has been long felt that if an
agent were a fairy, he could be gotten at by the Russians and
blackmailed or set up and turned.
GD:
Well, that makes sense but there are so many people like that in DC
that it would be difficult not to find a few in various agencies. I
think it must be the military bases with their legions of muscled
hustlers that draws these people. And the, of course, one gets into
an agency and of course has to have company.
RTC:
Yes. The Jews are the same way. You let one in and pretty soon, the
office looks like a synagogue. And it’s always us against them.
The same way with the fairies. That’s the main reason why I object
to having them on board.
GD:
But the problem with Inman….
RTC:
Back in 1980 there was a fairy scare over at NSA. Real McCarthy
purges, finger pointing, anonymous letters and so on. A number of
the top brass there were scared shitless lest they, too, got
exposed. Bill knows some of this and he has known Inman for a long
time. There was an ugly incident when he was in law school. I was
told that Bill was able to shut the matter down. That is one of the
reasons Bill has such good rapport in certain circles.
GD:
He’s blackmailing them?
RTC:
In a sense. During the Carter days, Bill could pretty well get what
he wanted from certain highly placed intelligence people. I think I
should leave it at that, Gregory. Talk to Bill about this if you
like but I doubt he’ll tell you anything and, yes, you are right.
Washington is indeed full of those people. A lot in Congress, the
military, especially the Air Force and various agencies. The FBI is
rather picky but we and NSA have quite a few queers on board. The
NSG has more than its share. And if you go into some of the faggot
bars here, you might see a number of the prominent dancing around in
mesh stockings and wearing really bad wigs.
GD:
Oh, I’ve seen these in San Francisco. The wigs look like dead
cats. They don’t look any more like women than my dog but who
argues with self-delusion? Five kids and a wife at home and into the
lavatories with the holes in the partitions after work. During the
week, his name is George but on Saturdays, his name is Phyllis.
RTC:
(Laughter) Yes, we are overrun here.
GD:
Well, at least you can’t dump that one on Clinton although God
knows that the weird Christian freaks might try. My God, they hate
him and as far as I am concerned, these bone headed twits are far
worse than the queens. They believe in the strangest things and are
really obnoxious swine. They believe the world is only six thousand
years old, that Noah’s ark came to ground at 5,000 feet on a
mountain side and God only knows what other myths. I mean, Robert,
if another religious cult arose that worshipped the Easter Bunny, it
wouldn’t any more unbelievable than the Evangelicals. By the way,
did you know that Crisco’s main production plant in New Jersey
burned down last night? Yes. Millions now living will never fry.
RTC:
(Laughter) Ah, Gregory, I can see why so many hate you so much.
GD:
Well, one day, it will come out that Heini Mueller, head of the
Gestapo and number two man on the wanted Nazi escapee list was
living right near you and visiting the White House.
RTC:
We may have to wait a while before that gets to be public knowledge.
My God, the Hebes would scream so loud we would have to stuff
hundred dollar bills into their mouths like a mama bird shoving
worms into her babies. They are such arrogant and demanding people.
GD:
Yes, God’s chosen people, Robert. I wonder what God chose them
for? Probably to wait in line for the showers somewhere in Poland.
RTC:
If that’s true, Gregory, God should have finished the job.
(Concluded at 8:55 AM
CST)
|