In-House Memos on Television News Presentations
It has long been the strong belief of many Americans
that their print and television media is subject to certain
government oversight and, finally, control.
Recently, a mid-level executive of one of the three major
American television networks sent on over 1500 pages of memos from
the corporate offices of his network in New York to the
head of their television news division.
These memos contain a multitude of instructions concerning
the presentation of national and international news for the
network’s viewers. Corporate is obviously subject to the
opinions of various pressure groups, to include those of official
Washington and the Jewish community.
It would be impossible to show all of these revealing
documents but selections are certainly possible. What is not
possible, obviously, is to reveal either the name of the
conscience-stricken media executive nor the company that employs
him. These comments, therefore, can be accepted or rejected by the
reader as they see fit.
If the shoe fits,
however, wear it.
(March 22):….it is not conducive to
maintaining an overall neutrality in the Palestine uprisings to
show any pictures of the American peacenik that was run
over by the Israeli army bulldozer. This is only to be mentioned
as a “tragic accident” for which the IDF “is truly
saddened.”
(Feb 10)….It is not permitted at this
point to use or refer to any film clips, stills or articles
emanating from any French source whatsoever.
(Feb 26)
It is expected that coverage of the forthcoming Iraqi
campaign will be identical with the coverage used during Desert
Storm. Shots of GIs must show a mixed racial combination….any
interviews must reflect the youthful and idealistic, not the
cynical point of view…the liberation of happy, enthusiastic
Iraqis can be best shown by filming crowds of cheering citizens
waving American flags. Also indicated would be pictures of
photogenic GIs fraternizing with Iraqi children and handing them
food or other non-controversial presents…of course, pictures
of dead US military personnel are not to be shown and
pictures of dead Iraqi soldiers should not show examples of
violent death…also indicated would be brief interviews with
English-speaking Iraqi citizens praising American liberation
efforts…all such interviews must be vetted by either the
White House or Pentagon before public airing.
(March 12) At this point in time,
reference to North Korean military threats must be played down
entirely. The Iraqi Freedom campaign has to be concluded in
the public mind before proceeding with the next assault on the
Evil Axis….
(March 26) US alliances with the
Turkish/Iraqi Kurdish tribes should be played down. This is
considered a very sensitive issue with the Turks and American
arming and support of the Kurds could create a severe backlash in
Ankara….Kurds should be depicted as ‘Iraqi Freedom
Fighters” and not identified as Kurds…
(March 2) further references to the
religious views of the President are to be deleted…
(March 15) photo opportunities of the
President and members of his cabinet, especially Secretary
Rumsfeld, with enthusiastic GIs….
(March 19) No mention, repeat, no
mention, of Palestinian suicide bombers during the Iraqi
operation….
(March 25) …no mention of either
Wolfowitz or Pearle should be made at the present time.
(March 10)….pro-Government rallies are
to be given the fullest coverage…if anti-Government
demonstrations are shown, it is desired to stress either a very
small number of “eccentrics” or shots of social misfits; i.e.,
with beards, tattoos, physical deformities, etc. Pro-Government
supporters should be seen as clean cut with as many well-groomed
subjects as possible….subjects should stress complete support
for the President’s programs and especially support for
American military units en route to combat…also interviews
with photogenic family members of participating GIs stressing
loyalty and affection…American flags are always a good prop in
the background…
(March 30) Friction between Secretary
Rumsfeld and senior military field commanders in Iraq are to be
strictly minimalized and used only when impossible to avoid….the
Secretary’s point of view on all military matters is to be
stressed….important to bring out his reputation as a “man who
shakes things up” and a brilliant innovator.
(March 31) ….no discussion of high-level
rumors about pre-emptive tactical nuclear strikes against North
Korean missile, “hard” artillery positions opposite Seoul or
key North Korean leadership or military commands is to be
mentioned. It must be stressed that the North Korean situation is
viewed as “serious but not critical” by unnamed “senior U.S.
military leaders.”
(March 31) ….no mention of PRC strong
objections to US pre-emptive actions against North Korea….a
short summary of the President’s refusal to “enter into any
kind of negotiations” with the North Korean government….background
report on the irrational and anti-democratic forces in North
Korea…the desire of South Korea’s officials to maintain a
close relationship with their American military protectors….no
discussion of anti-US demonstrations in Seoul. These can be
routinely dismissed as “radical students who are not supported
by the new liberal and strongly pro-American President.”
April 4) …sharply rising unemployment
numbers, this should be countered with official interviews
stressing that the unemployment situation is now stabilizing
and expected to fall soon.
(March 30) Because of the seriousness of
the spread of SARS, actual figures of either the infected
or of any deaths from local medical facilities must be
carefully vetted via the CDC press information office in Atlanta.
From the highest level, it is imperative that the American
public not panic over the very rapid spread of this disease.
Speculations of the actual nature of SARS is not under
any circumstances to be permitted. Keep in mind the currently
in- place rules following the outbreak of “Legionnaires
Disease.”
(April 4) …a discussion of French
desecrations of American and British war graves in France are to
receive specific notice. Also, damage to the 9/11 memorial in
Paris is to be included. No pictures of swastikas or other
defamatory and anti-Administration graffiti are to be shown.
French official apologies are permitted…..no comments equating
the President with Hitler will be made….and the invasion of Iraq
may not be compared with Hitler’s invasion of Poland, and such
allegations now being made extensively in offshore media coverage
are not to receive any attention. The Iraqi campaign is officially
a campaign by a democratic United States against ruthless cruelty
and oppression.
(April 5)…. comments appearing in the
left-wing British Guardian about the occupation and administration
of a conquered Iraq by American military personnel are to be
ignored. Pacification, liberation, freedom and gratitude towards
US forces, and the President are to be stressed.
(March 29) The President’s goal, to
achieve oil autarchy by the United States, is suggested as a
future series. Congressional denial of drilling in various
environmentally “sensitive” areas may be derided as foolish
misunderstanding of America’s vital oil needs. The
interdiction of oil shipments to the United States from Venezuela
and Nigeria are not to be commented upon. The attitude of Chavez
towards the United States is also considered a non-topic. He was
removed from power once and it can happen a second time. File
footage of large crowds of distressed and unhappy Venezuelans
should be prepared against the time he is removed from power
again…
(April 4) If possible, pictures of the
President with a book or, better, actually reading, are suggested.
Commentary about his extensive reading habits…stress important
historical and economic works…
(April 5) Presidential visits to military
units in the United States are to receive full coverage and to
extend past the usual slot time…spots of especially warm
receptions are considered very important…
(April 7)
Please arrange for photo ops of President visiting wounded
GIs….Use photogenic subjects w/good racial mix. Also try for pix
of First Lady handing wounded subject a gift…President
decorating wounded (in hospital bed) w medal(s) Make sure subject
smiles at P. Warm handshakes (if possible.)
(April 7
) …no shots of GIs looting in Baghdad. Iraqi looters
should be described as “joyful” at being liberated by US.
Looting to be described as a “deprived people getting food for
families”…all pictures from forbidden French press sources
of a US General’s
staff car being filled with paintings and carpets to be
blacklisted at Pentagon request. If such pixs show up on other
networks, comment be made that General is “rescuing art
treasures to preserve them for the Iraqi people.” Also Iraqi
rioters could be shown waving in friendly way to GIs.
( April 4 ) Alliance casualties to be
played down. The massive Iraqi civilian casualties also played
down. Use the phrase, “most civilian casualties caused by vindictive
Saddam supporters.” Again, no pixs of dead women and
children.
(April 6 ) Artillery targeting of several
mosques to be deleted…..
(April 2) … prepare a piece on the
withdrawal of all US troops from S. Korea. Main theme: US pulling
out to prevent N. Korea from attacking. Stress the pro-US
stance of Noh and his firm support of the President and
his goal of preventing N. Korean military adventurism…no mention
of ongoing S. Korean anti-US riots. They are to be called
“radical student demonstrations” but do not show clips unless
it can be determined that the numbers shown are very small.
(Jan 21, 2002 )… in any article on Enron
collapse, it is not considered advisable to discuss role of K.
Lay. Charges against lesser Enron executives to be stressed.
Lay’s extensive gifts to President to be limited to “small
campaign contributions” and shift emphasis to large gifts to
Ashcroft for his presidential campaign. Mention A’s recusal from
Enron investigations…
(April 9 ) …play down the Moscow
meetings w. Schroeder, Putin and French. Please, no mention of
NATO problems…
(April 9 ) …concerning Moscow meetings,
say Russia, Germany and France are willing to forgive their
huge Iraqi debts at the direct request of President. Stress the
need for Iraq to rebuild after years of repression and need to
keep her funds “to help her people.”
(April 8 ) …develop possible linkage
between Iraqi mobs and US need to police the country
for a “brief time” to prevent any attempt to stifle
emerging democracy. Do not mention probability of
continued large US military presence. Stress the words
“restoring law and order” and “helping to make the
transition to true democracy.”
(April 11)
US attack on Russian Ambassador’s convoy either to be
ignored or blamed on “unknown Arab terrorists” who support
Hussein. Considered expedient that if mention is made of attack,
not to identify the country involved. This incident, officially
termed a misunderstanding, is being cleared up with Russia
now.
(
April 7)… attacks on foreign media, often unfriendly to US, to be explained as a “tragic error” and use the rationale
of “pro-Saddam last ditch fanatics sniping at liberating US
troops.” from areas attacked by US armor.
(April 13 ) SARS is now officially
“under control” in the US. Air travel, in the US, has been
cleared by CDC and other groups as “entirely safe.”
Officially, there are no deaths from SARS in the United
States. Use feed clips from CBC on “complete control” of
disease in Canada… also mention lack of responsible reporting on
subject by China.
(April 9 ) …in coverage of rebuilding of
Iraq’s infrastructure, mention that American firms have
expressed willingness to ”assist Iraq people to build a new,
democratic nation.” No mention, by name, of Halliburton or
Bechtel.
(April 10 ) show mention of restoration of
Moscow statue of KGB founder…(linkage here) mention Putin’s
former membership in KGB and very brief discussion of “growing
pro-Stalinist” feelings in Russia. Consider this background for
future series on same subject.
Editor’s Comments
During the middle of March, 2003, tbrnews received an email
from a man who claimed to be a mid-level executive with a major
American television network. He stated in this, and subsequent,
emails that he was in possession of “thousands” of pages of
in-house memos sent from his corporate headquarters in New York
City to the head of the network’s television news department. He
went on to say that these memos set forth directives about what
material was, and was not, to be aired on the various outlets of
the network.
This individual claimed he was developing serious doubts
about the strict control of media events and decided that he would
pass this material along to someone who might make use of it.
There was the
question of his job security. If someone published his name, it
would be certain he was not only fired but blackballed throughout
his profession.
If tbrnews would agree to protect his identity, he would
send us these alleged thousands of pages of notes, going back to
2001.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating so we accepted
his caveats and he then sent to us by disk the pages he spoke of.
All are on corporate stationary, signed or initialed by the
senders and again, signed or initialed by the recipients in the
news division.
It was always possible that this material consisted of a
very involved hoax or was something designed for the news site to
use and then have it revealed that it was not original. It would
not be the first time that spurious disinformation had been sent
to us in the hopes that it would be used.
There were not “thousands of pages” of memos but a
total of 1,497 separate pages involved. Many of them consisted of
short memos while others ran to a larger format.
Naturally, someone could easily have obtained correct
in-house network letterheads, made copies of them and prepared
false memoranda but the sheer size and depth of the collection was
impressive.
If these memos were true, they showed with a terrible
clarity that at least one part of the American mass media was
strictly controlled and that the news was so doctored and spun
that it might as well be official news releases from the White
House and Pentagon.
The best way in which to ascertain whether or not these
documents contained original information was to check the dates of
issuance and compare the information with subsequent news stories.
This was a terrible, time-consuming chore but by selecting
random memos and looking through the archives of various national
newspapers, checking AP releases and so on, the results indicated
that indeed, news was being managed.
However, it was also possible that someone else did this
and was preparing these after the fact and making the memos
conform to published material.
That having been said, we insisted on absolutely current
memos so that we could then check these against future
publications. If, for example, a corporate order was to show
certain pictures or spin a story in a certain way, it would be
relatively simple to simply read the press or watch television
news to see if these suggestions were implemented.
It was both shocking and gratifying to note that this
proved to be the case and so we began to put these up, either in
toto or, more often, in excerpt and watch as ordained news was
created before our eyes.
When a corporate order states, for instance, that certain
pictures should be shown with accompanying commentary and the memo
predates a published story by a week or more, then it is more than
likely that the memos are not inspired guesswork but genuine.
When tbrnews put up the first two pages, there were two
forms of public response. One was to thank us for exposing
something many people believed; that the American media was
controlled and not free. (That much can easily be ascertained by
reading the websites of various reputable foreign publications
such as the Swiss NZZ, the British Guardian, the Canadian Toronto
Globe and Mail, Reuters News Service and the Jerusalem Post. What
any viewer can see on these sites is certainly not reflected in
the American media.)
The second response consisted of irate, and literate,
statements that all of these
items were just stupid hoaxes and should not be believed.
“I believe,” one writer who claimed to be a Professor of
Journalism at an Ivy League college said, “these are just
disinformation designed to discredit American journalists whose
reputation for honesty and integrity is certainly beyond question.
You are performing a great disservice in repeating these
politically-motivated fictions…”
This is certainly a true statement because if it became
generally accepted that the American media was only a mechanical
parrot for various political organization, it would no longer be
either believed or watched. If viewers turned off their television
sets, the networks would lose huge amounts of advertising revenue,
reporters would be laid off and people would turn instead to the
Internet for their news.
Tbrnews receives many emails on a daily basis but the input
on this subject has been so great that we have decided to expand
the articles, irate journalists and professors to the contrary.
In the final analysis, it is always up to the reader to
make up their own mind as to the truth, or fiction, of what they
read. The media has an opposite view of this.
Shortly after this series began, we received the following
article from a viewer.
It is written to an idea and we are not in full agreement
with many of the sentiments expressed by the writers but the
salient facts stated therein are indisputable and easily verified
and for this reason, we are printing it as a companion piece to
this series of articles.
Who
Rules America?
by the Research Staff of National Vanguard Books P.O. Box 330
· Hillsboro · West Virginia 24946 · USA
There is no greater power in the world today than
that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No
king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever
disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few
dozen men who control America's mass media of news and
entertainment.
Their power is not distant and impersonal; it
reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during
nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds
the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor,
simple or sophisticated.
The mass media form for us our image of the world
and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially
everything we know -- or think we know -- about events
outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to
us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio,
or our television.
It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of
certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant
propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas"
that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the
media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in
their management of the news and the entertainment that they
present to us.
For example, the way in which the news is covered:
which items are emphasized and which are played down; the
reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions;
the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations -- all of
these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in
which we interpret what we see or hear.
On top of this, of course, the columnists and
editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what
we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed
psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so
that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the
"beautiful people," the "smart money." They
let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various
types of people and behavior by placing those people or that
behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and
having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct
way.
Molding
American Minds
For example, a racially mixed couple will be
respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters,
as will a "take charge" Black scholar or businessman, or
a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and
hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the other hand, a white
person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly
darkening racial situation in America -- is portrayed, at best, as
a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at
worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and
is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The white racist
"gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on
TV shows.
The average American, of whose daily life
TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between
these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at
all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and
attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real
life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced
by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this
false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV
scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through
the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of
others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers
toward conformity with his own views.
And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also
with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing
about this form of thought control is that even when we realize
that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are
able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant
what they present, but they establish tacit boundaries and ground
rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.
As an example, consider the media treatment of
Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly
pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly
neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government
is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict and that it
served Jewish interests, rather than American interests, to send
U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the
Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from
pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.
Another example is the media treatment of racial
issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost
dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are
emotionally partisan -- with the partisanship always on the
non-white side. All of the media spokesmen without exception,
however, take the position that "multiculturalism" and
racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things.
Because there are differences in degree, however,
most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated.
Even the citizen who complains about "managed news"
falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with
an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought
controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of
his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose"
situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public
opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible
fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can
prevent it.
The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly
monolithic. All of the controlled media -- television, radio,
newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures -- speak with a
single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance
of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of
facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might
allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media
masters. They are presented with a single view of the world -- a
world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races,
the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the
wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of Latino aliens
pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to
keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual
orientations, and the desirability of a "pluralistic,"
cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous one. It is a view
of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends
-- and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming.
People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and
shape their lives to fit it.
And who are these all-powerful masters of the
media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It
isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by
profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that
were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect,
at least approximately, the ratio of rich gentiles to rich Jews.
Despite a few prominent exceptions, the preponderance of Jews in
the media is so overwhelming that we are obliged to assume that it
is due to more than mere happenstance.
Electronic
News & Entertainment Media
Continuing government deregulation of the
telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted
increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of
corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of
multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these
conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their
competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever
you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or
via cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in
a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to
recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine
-- it is very likely that the information or entertainment you
receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia
companies.
AOL-TW.
The
largest media conglomerate today is AOL-Time Warner,
created when America Online bought Time Warner
for $160 billion in 2000. The merger brought together Steve Case,
a White gentile, as chairman of AOL-TW, and Gerald
Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. A brief history of the company is in
order.
The four (gentile) Warner brothers founded their
movie company in 1907 and had their first major success ten years
later with My 4 Years in Germany. WB incorporated in
1923 and went on to cartoon success with Porky Pig and Bugs Bunny.
In 1948, WB sold its film library to MGM.
In 1949, another court ruling forced WB to sell its
cinema chain, obstructing vertical integration by a single
movie-making company, while doing nothing to prevent the Jews from
establishing such integration through an ethnic collaboration.
In 1958, WB created Warner
Brothers Records, which was later renamed WEA.
In 1968, Jack Warner sold his shares to Seven Arts,
while DC and All-American Comics were bought by
Kinney National Services (a funeral parlor conglomerate). Kinney
turned around and bought a talent agency, then turned around again
and bought Warner-Seven Arts, becoming Warner
Communications.
Warner Communications
bought Elektra Records in 1970, the same year that
David Geffen, a Jew, started the Asylum label. (The
name is synonymous with crazy-house.) Time bought
HBO from Charles Dolan in 1972. Ironically, 1972 was also the year
when Money magazine began publication, while the
(original) magazine Life ceased.
Ted Turner entered the major media scene in 1976
when his TV station WTCG (Atlanta) was carried on US
cable networks. In 1979, Turner Communications Group
became Turner Broadcasting System, and WTCG was
renamed WTBS. The following year, CNN became
the world's first 24-hour all-news cable network. Turner tried to
buy CBS in 1985, but he was blocked when Lawrence
Tisch, a Jew, bought 25% of shares. Instead, Turner bought MGM's
film library (1986). TBS merged with Castle
Rock and New Line Cinema in 1994. In 1996,
Turner made a career-busting faux pas by selling TBS to
Time Warner. AOL bought Time
Warner in 2000.
In 2001, Gerald Levin, who had been Chairman of
Time Warner and then CEO of the merged AOL-TW,
fired Ted Turner from his position during a telephone
conversation. Control of TBS temporarily shifted to
Robert Pittman but was given shortly afterward to Walter Isaacson,
a Jew, who was recruited from his former position at Time Inc., to
take over the company that Ted Turner built. We're reasonably
certain that Ted Turner would not have sold TBS to Time
Warner if he'd known that Levin was going to fire him only
five years later. Levin smooth-talked Turner in classic Jewish
fashion, and Turner, having placed his trust in a Jew's honor,
paid the price for that mistake.
But Levin wasn't finished with his dagger. Having
backstabbed Turner, he did likewise to his other useful dupe,
Robert Pittman. Pittman had been Levin's champion for the AOL-TW
merger on the AOL side. While we don't know for
certain what Pittman's motive was, we could guess that it had
something to do with Pittman believing himself to be Levin's
choice as the new CEO at AOL-TW after Levin's
retirement. But when the time came to finalize his choice of
successor, Levin bypassed Pittman and gave the position to his
long-time pet mulatto, Richard Parsons. Parsons has been AOL-TW's
CEO since May 2002. Pittman, though initially grumpy about this
treatment, has moderated his tone. A paycheck less than Parsons'
paycheck is still better than no paycheck at all.
Before the merger, AOL was the
largest Internet service provider in America, and it is now being
used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time
Warner. Time Warner, with 1997 revenues of
more than $13 billion, was the second largest of the international
media leviathans when it was bought by AOL.
Time Warner's
subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable network.
Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Edgar
Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record
company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner
Brothers Records (WEA). Warner Music was an
early promoter of "gangsta rap." Through its involvement
with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's acquisition by MCA),
it helped to popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly
encourage Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites.
AOL-TW's publishing ventures include Time-Life
International Books, Time-Life Education,
Time-Life Music, Time-Life AudioBooks, Book-of-the-Month Club
(both adult and children's branches), Paperback Book Club,
History Book Club, Money Book Club, HomeStyle Books,
Crafter's Choice, One Spirit, Little Brown, Bulfinch Press, Back
Bay Books, Warner Books, Warner Vision, The Mysterious Press,
Warner Aspect, Warner Treasures, Oxmoor House, Leisure Arts,
Sunset Books and TW Kids.
AOL-TW owns the following cable and
satellite companies, among others: Cinemax, Time
Warner Sports, HBO (7 US and 6 international divisions), CNN
(10 divisions worldwide), Time Warner Cable, Road Runner,
Time Warner Communications (primarily a telephone service),
New York City Cable Group, New York 1 (a sort of CNN
devoted exclusively to news in the NYC area), Time Warner
Home Theater, Time Warner Security (video monitoring), Court-TV
(ownership shared with Liberty Media), Comedy
Central (ownership shared with Viacom) and Kablevision
(Hungary).
AOL-TW owns the following TV and movie
companies: Warner Brothers, WB studios, WB Television
(Productions, Animation, and Network), Hanna-Barbera Cartoons,
Telepictures Production, Witt-Thomas Productions, Castle
Rock Entertainment, Warner Home Video, WB Domestic Pay-TV, WB
Domestic TV Distribution, WB International TV Distribution,
The Warner Channel (separate companies for Latin America,
Asia-Pacific, Australia, and Germany), and WB International
Theaters in 12 countries.
The
editor-in-chief of Time Warner's publishing division
is Norman Pearlstine. AOL-TW owns the following
magazines: Time, Time Asia, Time Atlantic, Time Canada, Time
Latin America, Time South Pacific, Time Money, Time For Kids,
Fortune, Life (the watered-down new version), Sports
Illustrated (plus SI Women/Sport, SI International,
and SI For Kids), Inside Stuff, Money, Your Company, Your
Future, People, Who Weekly (Australia), People en
Español, Teen People, Entertainment Weekly, EW Metro, The Ticket,
In Style, Southern Living, Progressive Farmer, Southern Accents,
Cooking Light, Travel Leisure, Food & Wine, Your Company,
Departures, SkyGuide, Vertigo, Paradox, Milestone, Mad Magazine,
Parenting, Baby Talk, Baby on the Way, This Old House, Sunset,
Sunset Garden Guide, Health, Hippocrates, Costal Living, Weight
Watchers, Real Simple, President (Japan), and Dancyu
(Japan). AOL-TW owns 80 additional magazines (mostly
hobby and leisure) in Britain.
AOL-TW holds the following music record
labels: Atlantic Group, Atlantic Classics, Atlantic
Jazz, Atlantic Nashville, Atlantic Theater, Big Beat, Background,
Breaking, Curb, Igloo, Lava, Mesa/Bluemoon, Modern, Rhino Records,
Elektra, EastWest, Asylum, Elektra/Sire, Warner Brothers Records,
Warner Nashville, Warner Alliance, Warner Resound, Warner Sunset,
Reprise, Reprise Nashville, American Recordings, Giant, Maverick,
Revolution, Qwest, Warner Music International, WEA Telegram, East
West ZTT, Coalition, CGD East West, China, Continental, DRO East
West, Erato, Fazer, Finlandia, MCM, Nonesuch, and Teldec.
Disney.
The second-largest media conglomerate today, with
1997 revenues of $23 billion, is the Walt Disney Company.
Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire,
headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a control
freak," includes several television production companies (Walt
Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena
Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100
million subscribers altogether. The TV stations under Disney
control include: WLS (Chicago), WJRT (Flint),
KFSN (Fresno), KTRK (Houston), KABC
(Los Angeles), WABC (New York City), WPVI
(Philadelphia), WTVD (Raleigh), KGO (San
Francisco) and WTVG (Toledo).
Disney also has a major presence in
radio, owning WKHX, WYAY and WDWD in
Atlanta; WMVP, WLS, and WXCD in
Chicago; WBAP and KSCS in Dallas;
WDRQ, WJR and WPLT in Detroit; KLOS
and KTZN in Los Angeles; KQRS, KXXR, KDIZ,
KZNR, and KZNT in St. Paul; WPLJ in
New York City; KSFO in San Francisco; WMAL,
WJZW, and WRQX in Washington; and ESPN
Radio.
As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion
Pictures Group, under Walt Disney Studios,
headed by Joseph E. Roth (also a Jew), includes Walt Disney
Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and
Caravan Pictures. Roth founded Caravan Pictures
in January 1993, and it is now headed by co-religionist Roger
Birnbaum. Disney also owns Miramax Films,
run by the Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced
such ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest,
and Kids.
When the Disney Company was run by
the gentile Disney family, prior to its takeover by Eisner in
1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it
still holds the rights to Snow White, the company
under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal of
so-called "adult" material.
In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital
Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the ABC Television
Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in
such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles,
San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated
stations in the United States and is part owner of several
European TV companies.
ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN,
is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein. The corporation
also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television
and A & E Television Networks cable companies,
with 67 million subscribers each. ABC Radio Network
owns 26 AM and FM stations, again in major cities such as New
York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.
Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital
Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1997.
Besides these publishing concerns, Disney owns Walt
Disney Company Book Publishing, Hyperion Books,
and Miramax Books. It also owns six daily
newspapers, including the Albany Democrat and the
St. Louis Daily Record.
Disney's magazine titles include Automotive
Industries, Biography (partial ownership), Discover,
Disney Adventures, Disney Magazine, ECN News, ESPN Magazine,
Family Fun, Family PC, Institutional Investor, Jane, JCK, Kentucky
Prairie Farmer, Kodin, Los Angeles, Multichannel News, Penny
Power, Talk, Top Famille (France), Video Business,
and Quality.
Disney operates 660 retail stores
worldwide (the figure is for April 2000). And, incidentally, it is
also invested in crude oil and natural gas exploitation.
On the Internet, Disney runs Buena Vista
Internet Group, ABC Internet Group, ABC.com,
ABCNEWS.com, Oscar.com, Mr. Showbiz, Disney Online, Disney's Daily
Blast, Disney.com, Family.com, ESPN Internet Group,
ESPN.sportzone.com, Soccernet.com, NFL.com, NBA.com, Infoseek
(partial ownership), and Disney Interactive.
Viacom.
Number three on the list, with 1997 revenues of
just over $13 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by
Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Viacom was
formed in 1971 as a way to dodge an anti-monopoly FCC ruling that
required CBS to spin off a part of its cable TV
operations and syndicated programming business. This move by the
government unfortunately did nothing to reduce the mostly Jewish
collaborative monopoly that remains the major problem with the
industry. In 1999, after CBS had again augmented
itself by buying King World Productions (a leading
TV program syndicator), Viacom acquired its
progenitor company, CBS, in a double mockery of the
spirit of the 1971 ruling.
Viacom produces and distributes TV
programs for the three largest networks, owns 13 television
stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount
Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Redstone
acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders'
votes at CBS and Viacom.
Working for Redstone as CBS's chief
executive is a Jew named Melvin A. Karmazin. He is the boss and
biggest individual shareholder of the company that owns the CBS
Television Network, 14 major-market TV stations, 160 radio
stations, the Country Music Television
and the Nashville Network cable channels, and a
large number of outdoor advertising assets.
Viacom's publishing division includes Simon
& Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, Fireside,
Archway Paperbacks and Minstrel Books, Anne Schwartz
Books, MTV Books, Nickelodeon Books, Pocket Books,
and Washington Square Press. It distributes videos
through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores (including the
Video Flicks chain in Australia). It is also
involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.
Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is
as the world's largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime,
MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV
and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and
larger shares of the juvenile television audience. The first
quarter of 2001 was the 16th consecutive quarter in which MTV
was rated as the #1 cable network for viewers between the ages of
12 and 24. Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares
of Viacom, has offered Beavis and Butthead as teen
role models and currently is the largest single purveyor of
race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America
and in Europe. MTV Networks acquired The Music
Factory (TMF) from the Dutch media and marketing group Wegener
in 2001. TMF distributes music to almost 10 million
homes in Holland and Belgium. MTV is expanding its
presence in Europe through new channels, including MTV Dance
(Britain) and MTV Live (Scandinavia). MTV Italy
is active through Cecchi Gori Communications. MTV
pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million
homes in 71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on
teenagers around the world.
Nickelodeon,
with about 65 million subscribers, has by far the largest share of
the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is
expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet
display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's
trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to
his kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV.
As of early 2001, Nickelodeon was continuing a
nine-year streak as the top cable network for children and younger
teenagers.
Viacom operates two major motion picture
enterprises jointly with Vivendi Universal (detailed
hereafter): United Cinemas International (UCI) and United
International Pictures (UIP).
Vivendi Universal.
Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr.
He headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant,
until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father,
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress. Seagram
owned Universal Studios and Interscope
Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap."
These companies now belong to Vivendi Universal.
Bronfman became the biggest man in the record
business in May 1998 when he also acquired control of PolyGram,
the European record giant, by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch
electronics manufacturer Philips. With the revenue from PolyGram
added to that from MCA and Universal,
Bronfman became master of the fourth largest media empire, with
annual revenues around $12 billion. One especially unfortunate
aspect of the PolyGram acquisition was that it gave
Bronfman control of the world's largest producer of classical
music CDs: PolyGram owns the Deutsche
Grammophon, Decca-London, and Philips record
companies.
In June 2000, the Bronfman family sold Seagram
to Vivendi, a French utilities company
formerly led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. The combined company, Vivendi
Universal, retains Edgar Bronfman, Jr., as the vice
chairman of the new company, and he will continue to be in charge
of its entertainment division. As with the AOL-TW
merger, the strategy seemed to be infect and wait. The debt Vivendi
incurred by buying Universal was used to scandalize
Messier, who had to resign. Jean-René Fourtou became the
Chairman/CEO of Vivendi on 3 July 2002.
Subsequently, to pay off its debts, Vivendi-Universal
began selling assets, beginning with Seagam's
alcohol business, but later selling some of its media holdings,
including its Houghlin-Mifflin publishing company
(educational textbooks), which had been acquired in June 2001, to
a consortium formed by Thomas H. Lee Partners, Blackstone
Group, Bain Capital and Apax Partners.
Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which
owns Fox Television Network, 20th Century Fox
Films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest megamedia
corporation in the country, with 1997 revenues of over $11
billion. It is the only other media company which comes even close
to the top four. Murdoch is a gentile (so far as we know), but
Peter Chernin, who is president and CEO of Fox Group,
which includes all of News Corporation's film,
television, and publishing operations in the United States, is a
Jew. Under Chernin, as president of 20th Century Fox,
is Laura Ziskin, a Jewess who formerly headed Fox 2000.
Peter Roth works under Chernin as president of Fox
Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New
York Post and TV Guide, and they are
published under Chernin's supervision. Murdoch told Newsweek
magazine (July 12, 1999) that he would probably elevate Chernin to
CEO of News Corporation, rather than allow the
company to fall into the hands of his own children, none of whom
are younger than their late twenties. It is hard to imagine a Jew
giving a major media corporation to a gentile underling when he
has children waiting in the wings. For his part, Chernin was quite
candid: "I get to control movies seen all over the world.
. . . What could be more fun?"
Most of the television and movie production
companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also
controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment,
proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premier independent
TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald
Perelman, who also owns Revlon Cosmetics and who
offered a job to Monica Lewinsky when Bill Clinton was trying to
keep her quiet.
The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks
SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was
formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul
David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman
Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three
of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films,
television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and
connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks
may soon be in the same league as the big four.
It is well known that Jews have controlled most of
the production and distribution of films since shortly after the
inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th
century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to the
total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able
to grab ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they
have had everything their way in the movie industry.
Films produced by just the four largest motion
picture companies mentioned above -- Disney, Warner
Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal
(Seagram) -- accounted for two-thirds of the total
box-office receipts for the year 1997.
The big three in television network broadcasting
used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the
consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer
independent entities. While they were independent, however, each
was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by
Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and
then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William
Paley and then by Laurence Tisch
The executives at NBC recently were
shuffled among the key positions. Andrew Lack, who had been chief
of the network's news division, ascended to become its president
and chief operations officer. Neal Shapiro, who had been producing
Dateline NBC, moved into Lack's old job. Jeff Zucker,
who had been producing the Today show, was promoted
to NBC entertainment president (a job that
apparently was created for him), and Jonathan Wald moved into
Zucker's old spot after shoving aside Michael Bass, who had been
filling in for Zucker with Today. Some time ago,
Wald became the producer of the NBC Nightly News,
taking the position from Jeff Gralnick. When Wald moved to Today,
Steve Capus took over as Tom Brokaw's producer. It is not
known at this time whether Capus is a Jew or not, but everyone
else is.
A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news
divisions of the other networks. For example, in February 2000, Al
Ortiz moved to head the "Special Events" coverage at CBS,
making gentile Jim Murphy the executive producer of The CBS
Evening News with Dan Rather -- and the only exception
that we know of to an otherwise solidly Jewish cadre of television
news producers. The new CBS Early Show, which
replaced CBS This Morning, had an internal shakeup
in which three producers were fired, ostensibly for not being
"aggressive" enough. One wonders whether they were also
not Jewish enough. The shakeup did not, however, affect the
outgoing executive producer Al Berman, who transferred to a new
job as a program developer, and Steve Friedman has become the
executive producer of the Early Show.
Paul
Friedman is still the executive producer of ABC World News
Tonight with Peter Jennings. Rick Kaplan, once an
executive at ABC, moved to CNN
in 1997, where he became the president of CNN/USA.
The Print Media
After television news, daily newspapers are the
most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of
them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are
divided among some 1483 different publications (this figure is for
February 2000). One might conclude that the sheer number of
different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard
against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the
case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less
representation of majority interests than a casual observer would
think.
In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were
independently owned and published by local people with close ties
to their communities. Those days, however, are gone. Most of the
independent newspapers were bought out or driven out of business
by the mid-1970s. Today most "local" newspapers are
owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by
executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands of miles
away. Today less than 20 percent of the country's 1483 papers are
independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains.
Only 104 of the total number have circulations of more than
100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent
reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest must
depend on these few for all of their national and international
news.
The Associated Press,
which sells content to newspapers, is currently under the control
of its Jewish managing editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the
day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial
departments. Silverman had directed the AP's
national news as assistant managing editor since 1992. He was
promoted to his current job in 2000. Silverman reports to Jonathan
Wolman, also a Jew, who is executive editor for the AP.
(Comment: Nearly all the news
disseminated in the United States today, be it wire copy to
newspapers or television, comes in the main from the AP. It
controls and is the bottleneck through which all news passes and
he who controls the AP controls America’s news. Large newspapers
such as the New York Times have their own correspondents in
Washington and throughout the world buy many smaller papers and
television stations have to rely on the AP for national and
international news.)
In only 47 cities in America are there more than
one daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even
among them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the
same ownership. Examples of this are the Mobile, Alabama, morning Register
and afternoon Press-Register; and the Syracuse, New
York, morning Post-Standard and afternoon Herald-Journal
-- all owned by the Jewish Newhouse brothers through their holding
company, Advance Publications.
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of
more than the lack of real competition among America's daily
newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have
shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could
fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 30 daily newspapers,
including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain
Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New
Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting,
consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV
systems, including some of the country's largest cable networks;
the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of
more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major
magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House
& Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly
owned Conde Nast group.
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late
Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at
the age of 84, he bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated
$1.3 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of
further acquisitions, the net worth of Advance Publications
has grown to more than $8 billion today.
The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the
Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that
newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their
advertisers. It is advertising revenue -- not the small change
collected from a newspaper's readers -- that largely pays the
editor's salary and yields the owner's profit.
Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to
favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored
newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the
beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in
America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady
rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands,
accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing gentile
newspapers -- primarily as a result of selective advertising
policies by Jewish merchants.
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under
gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon
Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting
policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It
holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays
the piper calls the tune.
Major American Newspapers
The suppression of competition and the
establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and
opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over
America's newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the
press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be
better illustrated than by the examples of the nation's three most
prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times,
the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three, dominating America's financial and
political capitals, are the newspapers that set the trends and the
guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones that
decide what is news and what isn't, at the national and
international levels. They originate the news; the others merely
copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.
The New York Times, with a September
1999 circulation of 1,086,000, is the unofficial social, fashion,
entertainment, political, and cultural guide of the nation. It
tells America's "smart set" which books to buy and which
films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment; which
politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and
businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th
century it was a genuinely American newspaper.
The New York Times was founded in
1851 by two gentiles, Henry J. Raymond and George Jones. After
their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones's estate by a
wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-great-grandson,
Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current publisher and the
chairman of the New York Times Co. The executive
editor is Joseph Lelyveld, also a Jew (he is a rabbi's son).
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New
York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston
Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve
magazines, including McCall's and Family
Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each;
seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and
three book publishing companies. The New York Times News
Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs
from the New York Times by wire to 506 other
newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington
Post, which, by establishing its "leaks"
throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track
on news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New
York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in
1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John R.
McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In June 1933,
however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was
forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction
by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the
infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in America during the First
World War. The Washington Post was run by Katherine
Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter, until her death in 2001.
She was the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington
Post Co. and appointed her son, Donald Graham, publisher
of the paper in 1979. Donald became Washington Post Company
CEO in 1991 and its board chairman in 1993, and the chain
of Jewish control at the Washington Post remains
unbroken. The newspaper has a daily circulation of 763,000, and
its Sunday edition sells 1.1 million copies.
The Washington Post Co.
has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette
Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television
(WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG
in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT
in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in
magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly
newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post
Company's various television ventures reach a total of
about 7 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One,
has 635,000 subscribers.
In a joint venture with the New York Times,
the Post publishes the International Herald
Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language
daily in the world.
The Wall Street Journal, which sells
1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation's
largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones
& Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also publishes 24
other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's,
among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R.
Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and
publisher of the Wall Street Journal.
Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no
better hands than the New York Times and the Wall
Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York Daily
News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media
mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate
developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice
is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish
owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. And, as
mentioned above, the New York Post is owned by News
Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin.
News Magazines
The story is pretty much the same for other media
as it is for television, radio, films, music, and newspapers.
Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any
importance published in the United States: Time, Newsweek,
and U.S. News & World Report.
Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1
million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner
Communications, the new media conglomerate formed by the
1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner
Communications. Although Gerald Levin has retired, Time
Warner Communications is still essentially
Jewish in character.
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published
by the Washington Post Company, under the Jew Donald
Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.1 million.
U.S. News & World Report,
with a weekly circulation of 2.2 million, is owned and published
by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who also has taken
the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for himself.
Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New
York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is
the sixth-largest paper in the country.
Our
Responsibility
Those are the facts of media control in America.
Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking
into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television
industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into
registers of corporations and their officers, such as those
published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and
into standard biographical reference works can verify their
accuracy.
Jewish media control determines the foreign policy
of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than
American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without
Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf war,
for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb
civilians. There would be no continued beating of the drums for
another war against Iraq.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and
entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a
decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of
our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and
souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more
by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or
any other influence.
Owners,
managers, and corporate relationships change from time to time, of
course. All of the names and other data in this report have been
checked carefully and are accurate as of December, 2002.
|