|
The
Slaughterhouse Informer
A
Compendiium of Various Official Lies, Business Scandals, Small
Murders, Frauds, and Other Gross Defects of Our Current Political,
Business and Religious Moral Lepers.
Presenting a new magazine that contains material that is not found
elsewhere and is very difficult to post on the Internet. The
‘Voice of the White House’ will appear in each issue containing
material not found on TBR News for very obvious reasons.This
publication will appear once a week, on Wednesday, every week, will
be ten pages in length and is available by subscription only. The
price is $5.00 a month and can be paid via PayPal or by check, sent
to ‘Morris Productions, 3015 E. New York St. Ste A2-190, Aurora,
Il 60504.’ If you don’t like it, and Bush supporters can read
the Drudge Report for free, you can cancel at any time.
TBR Ebooks
Civil
insurrection in America and government countermeasures: The official
papers
By
Bradley Moscrip
An
in-depth study of official American plans to construct FEMA
detention centers in America and specific recent U.S. Army domestic
counterinsurgency plans. Here is a sampling of the ebook contents:
Gun
Control by Confiscation
As the American general population is known to be
the most heavily armed in the world, immediately upon the
declaration of Martial Law and the execution by the military of
counterinsurgency programs, it has been determined that the BATF,
will begin the process of rounding up all rifles, pistols and
so-called assault weaponry from the civil population. Lists of gun
collectors obtained from firearms dealers, gun magazine subscription
lists and other sources will be the basis for these mass
confiscations. Gun owners will be supplied documentation by the BATF
showing which pieces have been confiscated so that in the future,
they will be told, they can recover their weapons when the state of
emergency has passed. In actuality, weapons that do not have a high
value or are not suitable for arming loyalist police forces, will be
destroyed by order
This
study is available from tbrnews at
$5.00
by PayPal
The Voice of the White House
Washington,
D.C., December 13, 2009: “History, usually of a negative nature,
always but always repeats itself. As a case in point, consider the
military situation, or rather the situation with the military.
The military, especially the ground troops of the Army and
Marines (with a few SEALS thrown in for leavening) have been
constantly at war since 2003: Six unrelenting years of what is in
reality a never-ending, nerve-wracking and often very fatal war with
fanatical guerrillas.
Our loony, and vicious,
leaders such as Bush, Blair and Cheney, told us in 2003 that
the war would be quick and our boys soon home. They knew they were
lying but hoped, privately, that they were right and soon we would
have control of the huge untapped Iraqi oil fields.
Instead of these pipe dreams coming true, the harsh reality
was a protracted war that killed many thousands of young Americans
(the official DoD death reports were very low on orders) the damage
to our trucks, tanks, helicopters, personnel carriers and on and on
due to the destructive effect of Iran’s sandy climate.
Of course in addition to the dead, we had many, many more
soldiers who yearned to come home to their families and friends but
were (and are still) denied this by a frantic Pentagon who kept
trying to convince the Oval Office, Congress and themselves that
with just a few more men and just a little more time, victory would
be ours.
Of course they lied and in addition to deceiving themselves,
they deceived the American public as well.
Of the dead, nothing more can be spoken but the living are
something else. These mad and totally unproductive constant battles
with hit and run guerrillas has worn down the morale, and the
numbers of our standing army to a degree that, if ever revealed to
the public, would cause a revolution.
Over 80 k were killed in Vietnam and countless more crippled
for life, both physically and emotionally but stupid people never
learn from the errors of the past.
Now what we are having are countless small acts of rebellion
and desertion among our exhausted young men; and this does not even
take into account the serious physical and emotional problems that a
preoccupied government only occasionally addresses and then only
after a scandal bursts onto the scene and then with the smug
assurance that that, too, will pass.
Desertion and suicide rates are now soaring in our ground
forces and small acts of sabotage, some very serious, are
also growing on a daily basis but, as usual, the media will not
report it. Why won’t they do this? Their corporate owners are told
not to and, if nothing else, our leashed media does as its masters
tell them to (or not, as the case may be).
The basic purpose of any army is to defend its people but
presently, the Pentagon and the White House do not want you to know
that our current military is not only incapable of bringing an
elusive and very destructive enemy to decisive combat but is, de
facto, totally unable to defend this country.
This is a cat that no one wants to bell but it must be done,
immediately, or the results could bring national disaster, mass
mutinies and terrible civil unrest.”
Army
Releases November Suicide Data
The
Army released suicide data for the month of November today. Among
active-duty soldiers, there were 12 potential suicides, all of which
are pending determination of the manner of death. For October,
the Army reported 16 potential suicides among active-duty soldiers. Since
the release of that report, three have been confirmed as suicides,
and 13 remain under investigation.
There
were 147 reported active duty Army suicides from January 2009
through November 2009. Of these, 102 have been confirmed, and
45 are pending determination of manner of death. For the same
period in 2008, there were 127 suicides among active-duty soldiers.
During
November 2009, among reserve component soldiers who were not on
active duty, there were two potential suicides. Among that same
group, from January 2009 through November 2009, there were 71
reported suicides. Of those, 41 were confirmed as suicides, and
30 remain under investigation to determine the manner of death. For
the same period in 2008, there were 50 suicides among reserve
soldiers who were not on active duty.
In
a media roundtable on Nov. 17, 2009, Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, Army
vice chief of staff, confirmed that the total number of suicides in
the Army during 2009 had exceeded the total for 2008.
“We
conduct an exhaustive review of every suicide within the Army,”
said Brig. Gen. Colleen McGuire, director, Suicide Prevention Task
Force. “What we have learned is that there is no single or
simple answer to preventing suicide. This tells us that we must
continue to take a holistic approach to identifying and helping
soldiers and families with issues such as behavioral health
problems, substance abuse, and relationship failures.”
Although
operational tempo and frequent deployments are often cited as
possible causes for the Army’s increased suicide rate, data
gathered through the Army’s efforts has not shown a link between
operational tempo and suicide.
“We have analyzed this part of the problem very closely,” said
Walter Morales, Army suicide prevention program manager. “So
far, we just haven’t found that repeated deployments and suicide
are directly connected. Approximately 30 percent of suicides in
the Army occur among those who have never deployed. Many others
occur among those who have deployed once. This means we have to
continue to reach the entire Army community with effective suicide
prevention programs, for those who have deployed and those who
haven’t.”
In addition to the Army’s current campaign plan to improve the
full spectrum of health promotion, risk reduction, and suicide
prevention programs, the Army is testing pilot programs in virtual
behavioral health counseling, enhanced behavioral health counseling
before and after deployment, and expanded privacy protections for
soldiers seeking substance abuse counseling.
For
example, the Army recently completed the Virtual Behavioral Health
Pilot Program (VBHPP) at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. The VBHPP
team is now analyzing the initial results to help the Army better
determine whether the program should be expanded to additional units
and locations. Army leaders can access current health promotion
guidance in newly revised Army Regulation 600-63 (Health Promotion)
at http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r600_63.pdf and Army Pamphlet
600-24 (Health Promotion, Risk Reduction and Suicide Prevention) at
http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/p600_24.pdf .
Soldiers and families in need of crisis assistance can contact
Military OneSource or the Defense Center of Excellence (DCOE) for
Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Outreach Center. Trained
consultants are available from both organizations 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, 365 days a year.
The
Military OneSource toll-free number for those residing in the
continental U.S. is 1-800-342-9647; their Web site address is
http://www.militaryonesource.com . Overseas personnel should
refer to the Military OneSource Web site for dialing instructions
for their specific location.
The
DCOE Outreach Center can be contacted at 1-866-966-1020, via
electronic mail at Resources@DCoEOutreach.org , and at http://www.dcoe.health.mil
.
The
Army’s comprehensive list of Suicide Prevention Program
information is located at http://www.armyg1.army.mil/hr/suicide/default.asp
.
More
information about the Army’s Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program
is located at http://www.army.mil/csf/ .
Soldiers Forced to Go AWOL for PTSD Care
December
13, 2009
by
Dahr Jamail
Inter
Press Service
MARFA,
Texas - With a military health care system over-stretched by two
ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, more soldiers are deciding to
go absent without leave (AWOL) in order to find treatment for
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Eric
Jasinski enlisted in the military in 2005, and deployed to Iraq in
October 2006 as an intelligence analyst with the U.S. Army. He
collected intelligence in order to put together strike packets -
where air strikes would take place.
Upon
his return to the U.S. after his tour, Jasinski was suffering from
severe PTSD from what he did and saw in Iraq, remorse and guilt for
the work he did that he knows contributed to the loss of life in
Iraq.
"What
I saw and what I did in Iraq caused my PTSD," Jasinski,
23-years-old, told IPS during a phone interview, "Also, I went
through a divorce - she left right before I deployed - and my
grandmother passed away when I was over there, so it was all super
rough on me."
In
addition, he lost a friend in Iraq, and another of his friends lost
his leg due to a roadside bomb attack.
Upon
returning home in December 2007, Jasinski tried to get treatment via
the military. He was self-medicating by drinking heavily, and an
over- burdened military mental health counsellor sent him to see a
civilian doctor, who diagnosed him with severe PTSD.
"I
went to get help, but I had an 8 hour wait to see one of five
doctors. But after several attempts, finally I got a periodic check
up and I told that counsellor what was happening, and he said they'd
help me& but I ended up getting a letter that instructed me to
go see a civilian doctor, and she diagnosed me with PTSD,"
Jasinski explained, "Then, I was taking the medications and
they were helping, because I thought I was to get out of the Army in
February 2009 when my contract expired."
As
the date approached, a problem arose.
"In
late 2008 they stop-lossed me, and that pushed me over the
edge," Jasinski told IPS, "They were going to send me back
to Iraq the next month."
During
his pre-deployment processessing "they gave me a 90-day supply
of meds to get me over to Iraq, and I saw a counsellor during that
period, and I told him "I don't know what I'm going to do if I
go back to Iraq."
"He
asked if I was suicidal," Jasinski explained, "and I said
not right now, I'm not planning on going home and blowing my brains
out. He said, 'well, you're good to go then.' And he sent me on my
way. I knew at that moment, when they finalised my paperwork for
Iraq, that there was no way I could go back with my untreated PTSD.
I needed more help."
When
Jasinski went on his short pre-deployment leave break, he went AWOL,
where he remained out of service until Dec. 11, when he returned to
turn himself in to authorities at Fort Hood, in Killeen, Texas.
"He
has heavy duty PTSD and never would have gone AWOL if he'd gotten
the help he needed from the military," James Branum, Jasinski's
civilian lawyer who accompanied him to Fort Hood told IPS.
"This case highlights the need of the military to provide
better mental health care for its soldiers."
Branum,
who is also co-chair of the Military Law Task Force, added,
"Our hope is that his unit won't court-martial him, but puts
him in a warrior transition unit where they will evaluate him to
either treat him or give him a medical discharge. He'd be safe
there, and eventually, they'd give him a medical discharge because
his PTSD symptoms are so severe."
He's
turning himself in "because he is not a flight risk and wants
to take responsibility for what he's done," Branum stressed.
"It's
been a year, I want to get on with my life and go to college and
become a social worker to help people," Jasinski said of why he
is turning himself in to the military at this time. "I want to
get on with life, and I don't want to hide."
Kernan
Manion is a board-certified psychiatrist, who treated Marines
returning from war who suffer from PTSD and other acute mental
problems born from their deployments, at Camp Lejeune - the largest
Marine base on the East Coast.
While
he was engaged in this work, Manion warned his superiors of the
extent and complexity of the systemic problems, and he was deeply
worried about the possibility of these leading to violence on the
base and within surrounding communities.
"If
not more Fort Hoods, Camp Liberties, soldier fratricide, spousal
homicide, we'll see it individually in suicides, alcohol abuse,
domestic violence, family dysfunction, in formerly fine young men
coming back and saying, as I've heard so many times, 'I'm not cut
out for society. I can't stand people. I can't tolerate commotion. I
need to live in the woods,'" Manion explained to IPS.
"That's what we're going to have. Broken, not contributing, not
functional members of society. It infuriates me - what they are
doing to these guys, because it's so ineptly run by a system that
values rank and power more than anything else - so we're stuck
throwing money into a fragmented system of inept clinics and the
crisis goes on."
"It's
not just that we're going to have an immensity of people coming
back, but the system itself is thwarting their effective
treatment," Manion explained.
According
to the Army, every year from 2006 onwards there has been a record
number of reported and confirmed suicides, including in 2009.
There
has also been an escalation of soldier-on-soldier violence, as the
Nov. 5 shooting spree at Fort Hood by Major Nidal Hassan indicates.
In 2008 there was also a record number of suicides for the Marine
Corps.
Jasinski's
case is representative of a growing number of soldiers returning
from the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan who are going AWOL when
they are unable to get proper mental health care treatment from the
military for their PTSD.
A
2008 Rand Corporation report revealed that at least 300,000 veterans
returning from both wars had been diagnosed with severe depression
or PTSD.
Jaskinski's
experience with the military has inspired him to offer advice for
other soldiers who need PTSD treatment but are not receiving it.
"Do
not, do not let a 5-10 minute review by a military doctor determine
if you go to Iraq," he told IPS. "Even if you have to pay
out of pocket, go civilian to a doctor& the military mental
health sector is so overwhelmed, they won't take care of you. Go see
a civilian, and hopefully that therapist will help you& even
then I'm not sure that will help& but you have to take that
chance."
When asked what he feels the military needs to do in order to
rectify this problem, he said: "A total overhaul of the mental
health sector in the military is needed& we had nine
psychiatrists at our centre, and that's simply not enough staff,
they are going to get burned out, after seeing 50 soldiers each in
one day. We need an overhaul of the entire system, and more, good
psychiatrists, not those just coming for a job, but good,
experienced mental health professionals need to be involved."
Petraeus
Predicts Long, Expensive Mission in Afghanistan
Warns
Not to Judge for At Least a Year
December
9, 2009
by
Jason Ditz,
AntiWar.com
CENTCOM
commander General David Petraeus conceded again today that the war
in Afghanistan
will continue to “get harder before it gets easier,”
a daunting
prospect as the war has spiraled to record violence
already, and the Taliban is taking growing control over much of the
nation.
But as the war continues to worsen,
Gen. Petraeus doesn’t want to hear any complaints, insisting that
Congress should “reserve judgement” on the new strategy for at
least a year.
The
prospect that America will throw 30,000 more troops at Afghanistan
and forget about for the next 12 months as the death toll continues
to spiral seems unlikely, as President Obama’s March escalation of
21,000 troops only lasted a few months before generals started
hankering for another surge.
Gen
Petraeus is just the latest in a growing
chorus of military commanders conceding that the record violence of
2009 is going to give way to record violence in 2010. All
seem to be keeping on message that the violence is going to
eventually drop, but for the time being the effort
seems
mostly to stifle criticism of the rising casualties.
US
Losing War in Afghanistan, Mullen Admits
Joint
Chiefs Chairman Admits Situation Still Worsening
December
8, 2009
by
Jason Ditz,
AntiWar.com
“We
are not winning, which means we are losing and as we are losing, the
message traffic out there to insurgency recruits keeps getting
better and better and more keep coming.
This
was the message Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Michael
Mullen had for US soldiers at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, from which
two combat brigades will be sent to Afghanistan as part of President
Obama’s latest escalation.
When
President Obama sent 21,000 additional troops in his March
escalation, violence in Afghanistan only continued to worsen, and
Mullen and other top military officials are
predicting that the death toll in 2010 will be even higher, in no
small measure as a result of the new escalation.
Though
the White House has presented the current surge as a can’t miss
strategy that will yield such overwhelming results that they can
begin a pullout by July 2011, it seems that officials remain aware
the grim realities of an ever worsening war. Not so aware that they
would actually end the war in a timely fashion, of course, but aware
all the same.
The
Afghan/Iraq Death Toll: December 8
December
14, 2009
by
Brian Harring
December
2, 2009
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Pfc. Derrick D. Gwaltney,
21, of Cape Coral, Fla., died Nov. 29 south of Basra, Iraq, of
injuries sustained from a non-combat related incident.
He was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 377th Field Artillery
Regiment, 17th Fires Brigade, Fort Lewis, Wash.
The circumstances surrounding the incident are under
investigation.
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
Marine who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Lance Cpl. Jonathan A. Taylor,
22, of Jacksonville, Fla., died Dec. 1 while supporting combat
operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan.
He was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, 2nd
Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C.
December
4, 2009
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Sgt. Kenneth R. Nichols Jr.,
28, of Chrisman, Ill., died Dec. 1 in Kunar province, Afghanistan,
of wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked his unit using small
arms and rocket-propelled grenade fires.
He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment,
4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, Colo.
DOD Announces Afghanistan Force Deployment
http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=13167
The Department of Defense today announced the deployment of
approximately 16,000 additional forces to Afghanistan, the initial
elements of the 30,000 troops authorized by President Obama on Nov.
30. An infantry battalion task force, with approximately 1,500
Marines, from Camp Lejeune, N.C., will deploy later this month.
Regimental Combat Team-2, headquartered at Camp Lejuene, N.C., will
deploy approximately 6,200 Marines in early spring 2010. A Marine
Expeditionary Force (Forward) headquarters from I Marine
Expeditionary Force, Camp Pendleton, Calif., will deploy
approximately 800 Marines in spring 2010.
A
Brigade Combat Team (BCT), with approximately 3,400 soldiers from
the 1st Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, N.Y. will deploy
in early spring 2010 to conduct a training mission.
Secretary Gates also approved the deployment of approximately
4,100 support forces, which will deploy at various times into spring
2010.
DoD will continue to announce major unit deployments as they
are approved
December
9, 2009
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was
supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Sgt.
Elijah J. Rao,
26, of Lake Oswego, Ore., died Dec. 5 in Nuristan, Afghanistan, of
wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked his unit with an
improvised explosive device. He
was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 77th Field Artillery Regiment,
4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, Colo.
December
10, 2009
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
Marine who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Cpl.
Xhacob Latorre,
21, of Waterbury, Conn., died Dec. 8 of wounds sustained while
supporting combat operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan. He
was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 8th Marine Regiment, 2nd Marine
Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C.
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was
supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Staff Sgt. Dennis J. Hansen,
31, of Panama City, Fla., died Dec. 7 at the Landstuhl Regional
Medical Center in Landstuhl, Germany, of wounds sustained when
insurgents attacked his unit Dec. 3 with an improvised explosive
device in Logar province, Afghanistan. He was assigned to the
1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th
Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Fort Drum, N.Y.
December 11, 2009
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a Marine who was
supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Sgt.
Ralph Anthony Webb Frietas,
23, of Detroit, Mich., died Dec 8. as a result of unknown causes in
Baghdad. He was assigned to Marine Wing Support Squadron 172, Marine
Wing Support Group 17, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, III Marine
Expeditionary Force, Okinawa, Japan.
The
incident is under investigation.
December 14, 2009
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was
supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Pfc. Jaiciae L. Pauley,
29, of Austell, Ga., died Dec. 11 in Kirkuk, Iraq, of injuries
sustained from a non-combat related incident. He was assigned
to the 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat
Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, Ga.
The circumstances surrounding the incident are under investigation.
Laughing
in the Cemetery!
The economy is so bad that I got a pre-declined credit
card in the mail.
The economy is so bad Dick Cheney took his
stockbroker hunting.
The economy is so bad Motel Six won't leave the light on anymore.
The economy is so bad Exxon-Mobil laid off 25 Congressmen.
The economy is so bad, if the bank returns your check marked
"Insufficient
Funds," you call them and ask if they meant you or them.

A Kept Man
December
2, 2009
by
Paul Craig Roberts
takimag.com
It
didn’t take the Israel lobby very long to bring President Obama to
heel regarding his prohibition against further illegal Israeli
settlements on occupied Palestinian land. Obama discovered that a
mere American president is powerless when confronted by the Israel
lobby and that the United States simply is not allowed a Middle East
policy separate from Israel’s.
Obama
also found out that he cannot change anything else either, if he
ever intended to do so.
The
military-security lobby has war and a domestic police state on its
agenda, and a mere American president can’t do anything about it.
President
Obama can order the Guantanamo torture chamber closed and kidnapping
and rendition and torture to be halted, but no one carries out the
order.
Essentially,
Obama is irrelevant.
President
Obama can promise that he is going to bring the troops home, and the
military lobby says, “No, you are going to send them to
Afghanistan, and in the meantime start a war in Pakistan and
maneuver Iran into a position that will provide an excuse for a war
there, too. Wars are too profitable for us to let you stop them.”
And the mere president has to say, “Yes, Sir!”
Obama
can promise health care to 50 million uninsured Americans, but he
can’t override the veto of the war lobby and the insurance lobby.
The war lobby says its war profits are more important than health
care and that the country can’t afford both the “war on
terror” and “socialized medicine.”
The
insurance lobby says health care has to be provided by private
health insurance—otherwise, we can’t afford it.
The
war and insurance lobbies rattled their campaign contribution
pocketbooks and quickly convinced Congress and the White House that
the real purpose of the health care bill is to save money by cutting
Medicare and Medicaid benefits, thereby “getting entitlements
under control.”
Entitlements
is a right-wing word used to cast aspersion on the few things that
the government did, in the distant past, for citizens. Social
Security and Medicare, for example, are denigrated as
“entitlements.” The right wing goes on endlessly about Social
Security and Medicare as if they were welfare giveaways to shiftless
people who refuse to look after themselves, whereas in actual fact
citizens are vastly overcharged for the meager benefits with a 15
percent tax on their wages and salaries.
Indeed,
for decades now the federal government has been funding its wars and
military budgets with the surplus revenues collected by the Social
Security tax on labor.
To
claim, as the right wing does, that we can’t afford the only thing
in the entire budget that has consistently produced a revenue
surplus indicates that the real agenda is to drive the mere citizen
into the ground.
The
real entitlements are never mentioned. The “defense” budget is
an entitlement for the military-security complex about which
President Eisenhower warned us 50 years ago. A person has to be
crazy to believe that the United States, “the world’s only
superpower,” protected by oceans on its East and West and by
puppet states on its North and South, needs a “defense” budget
larger than the military spending of the rest of the world combined.
The
military budget is nothing but an entitlement for the
military-security complex. To hide this fact, the entitlement is
disguised as protection against “enemies” and passed through the
Pentagon.
I
say cut out the middleman and simply allocate a percentage of the
federal budget to the military-security complex. This way we won’t
have to concoct reasons for invading other countries and go to war
in order for the military-security complex to get its entitlement.
It would be a lot cheaper just to give them the money outright, and
it would save a lot of lives and grief at home and abroad.
The
U.S. invasion of Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with American
national interests. It had to do with armaments profits and with
eliminating an obstacle to Israeli territorial expansion. The cost
of the war, aside from the $3 trillion, was over 4,000 dead
Americans, over 30,000 wounded and maimed Americans, tens of
thousands of broken American marriages and lost careers, 1 million
dead Iraqis, 4 million displaced Iraqis and a destroyed country.
All
of this was done for the profits of the military-security complex
and to make paranoid Israel, armed with 200 nuclear weapons, feel
“secure.”
My
proposal would make the military-security complex even more wealthym
as the companies would get the money without having to produce the
weapons. Instead, all the money could go for multimillion dollar
bonuses and dividend payouts to shareholders. No one, at home or
abroad, would have to be killed, and the taxpayer would be better
off.
No
American national interest is served by the war in Afghanistan. As
the former British Ambassador Craig Murray disclosed, the purpose of
the war is to protect Unocal’s interest in the Trans-Afghanistan
pipeline. The cost of the war is many times greater than Unocal’s
investment in the pipeline. The obvious solution is to buy out
Unocal and give the pipeline to the Afghans as partial compensation
for the destruction we have inflicted on that country and its
population, and bring the troops home.
The
reason my sensible solutions cannot be effected is that the lobbies
think that their entitlements would not survive if they were made
obvious. They think that if the American people knew that the wars
were being fought to enrich the armaments and oil industries, the
people would put a halt to the wars.
In
actual fact, the American people have no say about what “their”
government does. Polls of the public show that half or more of the
American people do not support the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan and
do not support President Obama’s escalation of the war in
Afghanistan. Yet, the occupations and wars continue. According to
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the additional 40,000 troops are enough to
stalemate the war—that is, to keep it going forever, the ideal
situation for the armaments lobby.
The
people want health care, but the government does not listen.
The
people want jobs, but Wall Street wants higher-priced stocks and
forces American firms to offshore the jobs to countries where labor
is cheaper.
The
American people have no effect on anything. They can affect nothing.
They have become irrelevant, like Obama. And they will remain
irrelevant as long as organized interest groups can purchase the
U.S. government.
The
inability of the American democracy to produce any results that the
voters want is a demonstrated fact. The total unresponsiveness of
government to the people is conservatism’s contribution to
American democracy. Some years ago, there was an effort to put
government back into the hands of the people by constraining the
ability of organized interest groups to pour enormous amounts of
money into political campaigns and, thus, obligate the elected
official to those whose money elected him. Conservatives said that
any restraints would be a violation of the First Amendment’s
guarantee of free speech.
The
same “protectors” of “free speech” had no objection to the
Israel lobby’s passage of the “hate speech” bill, which has
criminalized criticism of Israel’s genocidal treatment of the
Palestinians and continuing theft of their lands.
In
less than one year, President Obama has betrayed all of his
supporters and broken all of his promises. He is the total captive
of the oligarchy of the ruling interest groups. Unless he is saved
by an orchestrated Sept. 11-type event, Obama is a one-term
president. Indeed, the collapsing economy will doom him regardless
of a “terrorist event.”
The
Republicans are grooming Sarah Palin. Our first female president,
following our first black president, will complete the transition to
an American police state by arresting critics and protesters of
Washington’s immoral foreign and domestic policies, and she will
complete the destruction of America’s reputation abroad.
Russia’s
Vladimir Putin has already compared the U.S. to Nazi Germany, and
the Chinese premier has likened the U.S. to an irresponsible,
profligate debtor.
Increasingly,
the rest of the world sees the U.S. as the sole source of all of its
problems. Germany has lost the chief of its armed forces and its
defense minister because the U.S. convinced or pressured, by hook or
crook, the German government to violate its Constitution and to send
troops to fight for Unocal’s interest in Afghanistan.
The
Germans had pretended that their troops were not really fighting,
but were engaged in a “peacekeeping operation.” This more or
less worked until the Germans called in an air strike that murdered
100 women and children lined up for a fuel allotment.
The
British are investigating their leading criminal, former Prime
Minister Tony Blair, and his deception of his own cabinet in order
to do George W. Bush’s bidding and provide some cover for Bush’s
illegal invasion of Iraq. The British investigators have been denied
the ability to bring criminal charges, but the issue of war based
entirely on orchestrated deception and lies is getting a hearing. It
will reverberate throughout the world, and the world will note that
there is no corresponding investigation in the U.S., the country
that originated the False War.
Meanwhile,
the U.S. investment banks, which have wrecked the financial
stability of many governments, including that of the U.S., continue
to control, as they have done since the Clinton administration, U.S.
economic and financial policy. The world has suffered terribly from
the Wall Street gangsters, and now looks upon America with a
critical eye.
The
United States no longer commands the respect it enjoyed under
President Ronald Reagan or President George Herbert Walker Bush.
World polls show that the U.S. and its puppet master are regarded as
the two greatest threats to peace. Washington and Israel outrank on
the most dangerous list the crazy regime in North Korea.
The
world is beginning to see America as a country that needs to go
away. When the dollar is over-inflated by a Washington unable to pay
its bills, will the world be motivated by greed and try to save us
in order to save its investments, or will it say: thank God, good
riddance?
Blackwater Guards Tied to Secret Raids by
the CIA
December
11, 2009
by
James Rizen and Mark Mazzetti
The
New York Times
WASHINGTON
- Private security guards from Blackwater Worldwide participated in
some of the C.I.A.'s most sensitive activities - clandestine raids
with agency officers against people suspected of being insurgents in
Iraq and Afghanistan and the transporting of detainees, according to
former company employees and intelligence officials.
The
raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during
the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with
Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders
called "snatch and grab" operations, the former employees
and current and former intelligence officers said.
Several
former Blackwater guards said that their involvement in the
operations became so routine that the lines supposedly dividing the
Central Intelligence Agency, the military and Blackwater became
blurred. Instead of simply providing security for C.I.A. officers,
they say, Blackwater personnel at times became partners in missions
to capture or kill militants in Iraq and Afghanistan, a practice
that raises questions about the use of guns for hire on the
battlefield.
Separately,
former Blackwater employees said they helped provide security on
some C.I.A. flights transporting detainees in the years after the
2001 terror attacks in the United States.
The
secret missions illuminate a far deeper relationship between the spy
agency and the private security company than government officials
had acknowledged. Blackwater's partnership with the C.I.A. has been
enormously profitable for the North Carolina-based company, and
became even closer after several top agency officials joined
Blackwater.
"It
became a very brotherly relationship," said one former top
C.I.A. officer. "There was a feeling that Blackwater eventually
became an extension of the agency."
George
Little, a C.I.A. spokesman, would not comment on Blackwater's ties
to the agency. But he said the C.I.A. employs contractors to
"enhance the skills of our own work force, just as American law
permits."
"Contractors
give you flexibility in shaping and managing your talent mix -
especially in the short term - but the accountability's still
yours," he said.
Mark
Corallo, a spokesman for Blackwater, said Thursday that it was never
under contract to participate in clandestine raids with the C.I.A.
or with Special Operations personnel in Iraq, Afghanistan or
anywhere else.
Blackwater's
role in the secret operations raises concerns about the extent to
which private security companies, hired for defensive guard duty,
have joined in offensive military and intelligence operations.
Representative
Rush D. Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who is chairman of the House
Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, said in an interview that
"the use of contractors in intelligence and paramilitary
operations is a scandal waiting to be examined." While he
declined to comment on specific operations, Mr. Holt said that the
use of contractors in such operations "got way out of
hand." He added, "It's been very troubling to a lot of
people."
Blackwater,
now known as Xe Services, has come under intense criticism for what
Iraqis have described as reckless conduct by its security guards,
and the company lost its lucrative State Department contract to
provide diplomatic security for the United States Embassy in Baghdad
earlier this year after a 2007 shooting that left 17 Iraqi civilians
dead.
Blackwater's
ties to the C.I.A. have emerged in recent months, beginning with
disclosures in The New York Times that the agency had hired the
company as part of a program to assassinate leaders of Al Qaeda and
to assist in the C.I.A.'s Predator drone program in Afghanistan and
Pakistan.
Leon
E. Panetta, the C.I.A. director, recently initiated an internal
review examining all Blackwater contracts with the agency to ensure
that the company was performing no missions that were
"operational in nature," according to one government
official.
Five
former Blackwater employees and four current and former American
intelligence officials interviewed for this article would speak only
on condition of anonymity because Blackwater's activities for the
agency were secret and former employees feared repercussions from
the company. The Blackwater employees said they participated in the
raids or had direct knowledge of them.
Along
with the former officials, they provided few details about the
targets of the raids in Iraq and Afghanistan, although they said
that many of the Iraq raids were directed against members of Al
Qaeda in Mesopotamia. To corroborate the claims of the company's
involvement, a former Blackwater security guard provided photographs
to The Times that he said he took during the raids. They showed
detainees and armed men whom he and a former company official
identified as Blackwater employees. The former intelligence
officials said that Blackwater's work with the C.I.A. in Iraq and
Afghanistan had grown out of its early contracts with the spy agency
to provide security for the C.I.A. stations in both countries.
In
the spring of 2002, Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, offered
to help the spy agency guard its makeshift Afghan station in the
Ariana Hotel in Kabul. Not long after Mr. Prince signed the security
contract with Alvin B. Krongard, then the C.I.A.'s third-ranking
official, dozens of Blackwater personnel - many of them former
members of units of the Navy Seals or Army Delta Force - were sent
to provide perimeter security for the C.I.A. station.
But
the company's role soon changed as Blackwater operatives began
accompanying C.I.A. case officers on missions, according to former
employees and intelligence officials.
A
similar progression happened in Iraq, where Blackwater was first
hired for "static security" of the Baghdad station. In
addition, Blackwater was charged with providing personal security
for C.I.A. officers wherever they traveled in the two countries.
That meant that Blackwater personnel accompanied the officers even
on offensive operations sometimes begun in conjunction with Delta
Force or Navy Seals teams.
A
former senior C.I.A. official said that Blackwater's role expanded
in 2005 as the Iraqi insurgency intensified. Fearful of the death or
capture of one of its officers, the agency banned officers from
leaving the Green Zone in Baghdad without security escorts, the
official said.
That
gave Blackwater greater influence over C.I.A. clandestine
operations, since company personnel helped decide the safest way to
conduct the missions.
The
former American intelligence officials said that Blackwater guards
were supposed to only provide perimeter security during raids,
leaving it up to C.I.A. officers and Special Operations military
personnel to capture or kill suspected insurgents or other targets.
"They
were supposed to be the outer layer of the onion, out on the
perimeter," said one former Blackwater official of the security
guards. Instead, "they were the drivers and the
gunslingers," said one former intelligence official.
But
in the chaos of the operations, the roles of Blackwater, C.I.A., and
military personnel sometimes merged. Former C.I.A. officials said
that Blackwater guards often appeared eager to get directly involved
in the operations. Experts said that the C.I.A.'s use of contractors
in clandestine operations falls into a legal gray area because of
the vagueness of language laying out what tasks only government
employees may perform.
P.W.
Singer, an expert in contracting at the Brookings Institution, said
that the types of jobs that have been outsourced in recent years
make a mockery of regulations about "inherently
governmental" functions.
"We
keep finding functions that have been outsourced that common sense,
let alone U.S. government policy, would argue should not have been
handed over to a private company," he said. "And yet we do
it again, and again, and again."
According
to one former Blackwater manager, the company's involvement with the
C.I.A. raids was "widely known" by Blackwater executives.
"It was virtually continuous, and hundreds of guys were
involved, rotating in and out," over a period of several years,
the former Blackwater manager said.
One
former Blackwater guard recalled a meeting in Baghdad in 2004 in
which Erik Prince addressed a group of Blackwater guards working
with the C.I.A. At the meeting in an air hangar used by Blackwater,
the guard said, Mr. Prince encouraged the Blackwater personnel
"to do whatever it takes" to help the C.I.A. with the
intensifying insurgency, the former guard recalled.
But
it is not clear whether top C.I.A. officials in Washington knew or
approved of the involvement by Blackwater officials in raids or
whether only lower-level officials in Baghdad were aware of what
happened on the ground.
The
new details of Blackwater's involvement in Iraq come at a time when
the House Intelligence Committee is investigating the company's role
in the C.I.A.'s assassination program, and a federal grand jury in
North Carolina is investigating a wide range of allegations of
illegal activity by Blackwater and its personnel, including gun
running to Iraq.
Several
former Blackwater personnel said that Blackwater guards involved in
the C.I.A. raids used weapons, including sawed-off M-4 automatic
weapons with silencers, that were not approved for use by private
contractors. In separate interviews, former Blackwater security
personnel also said they were handpicked by senior Blackwater
officials on several occasions to participate in secret flights
transporting detainees around war zones.
They
said that during the flights, teams of about 10 Blackwater personnel
provided security over the detainees.
"A
group of individuals were selected who could manage detainees
without the use of lethal force," said one former Blackwater
guard who participated in one of the flights.
Intelligence
officials deny that the agency has ever used Blackwater to fly
high-value detainees in and out of secret C.I.A. prisons that were
shut down earlier this year. Mr. Corallo, the Blackwater spokesman,
said that company personnel were never involved in C.I.A.
"rendition
flights," which transferred terrorism suspects to other
countries for interrogation.
Shell and Petronas Win Rights to Develop
Giant Iraq Oilfield
Majnoon
oilfield goes to Anglo-Dutch and Malaysian consortium in second
auction of oil assets since 2003 invasion
December
11, 2009
by
Haroon Siddique and agencies
The
Guardian/UK
A
consortium led by Shell has won the rights to develop the giant
Majnoon oilfield at the second auction of Iraq's oil rights since
the 2003 invasion.
The
auction for about a third of the country's known reserves quickly
surpassed last summer's sale, with Majnoon the largest field on
offer in the current round. A group of oil companies led by China's
CNPC struck a deal to develop the Halfaya field.
There
are 10 fields being auctioned over two days under tight security at
the Iraqi oil ministry's headquarters. Last summer's auction saw a
single deal struck despite eight fields being on offer.
Shell
and Malaysia's state-run oil company, Petronas, beat another
consortium consisting of France's Total SA and China National
Petroleum Corp for the rights to Majnoon, which has estimated
reserves of almost 13bn barrels of oil, compared with 4.1bn for
Halfaya.
A
total of 45 firms are vying for 20-year contracts to develop the 10
fields, spanning from northern Iraq to major fields in the Basra
region in the south. Among the bidders are Britain's BP, America's
Exxon Mobil and state-backed companies from Asia.
The
deals are crucial for Iraq, which relies on oil for 90% of its
government budget and sorely needs international companies' help in
boosting production and revamping its dilapidated oil sector. Iraq
has the world's third-largest known oil reserves.
Although
the security situation has improved since the 2007 surge of US
troops, the auction takes place against a background of attacks in
Baghdad that killed at least 127 people on Tuesday and raised
questions about the ability of Iraq security forces to stem the
violence as US troops depart.
Opening
the auction, Iraq's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, played down the
significance of Tuesday's attacks. "There is no security
deterioration in Iraq even if a security violation took place
here," he said.
The
US defence secretary, Robert Gates, flew into Iraq to discuss
security concerns. In a meeting with Maliki he expressed his
condolences for the Baghdad bombing and offered any assistance the
country might need.
|