|
The
Slaughterhouse Informer
A
Compendiium of Various Official Lies, Business Scandals, Small
Murders, Frauds, and Other Gross Defects of Our Current Political,
Business and Religious Moral Lepers.
Presenting a new magazine that contains material that is not found
elsewhere and is very difficult to post on the Internet. The
‘Voice of the White House’ will appear in each issue containing
material not found on TBR News for very obvious reasons.This
publication will appear once a week, on Wednesday, every week, will
be ten pages in length and is available by subscription only. The
price is $5.00 a month and can be paid via PayPal or by check. If you don’t like it, and Bush supporters can read
the Drudge Report for free, you can cancel at any time.
TBR Ebooks
Civil
insurrection in America and government countermeasures: The official
papers
By
Bradley Moscrip
An
in-depth study of official American plans to construct FEMA
detention centers in America and specific recent U.S. Army domestic
counterinsurgency plans. Here is a sampling of the ebook contents:
Gun
Control by Confiscation
As the American general population is known to be
the most heavily armed in the world, immediately upon the
declaration of Martial Law and the execution by the military of
counterinsurgency programs, it has been determined that the BATF,
will begin the process of rounding up all rifles, pistols and
so-called assault weaponry from the civil population. Lists of gun
collectors obtained from firearms dealers, gun magazine subscription
lists and other sources will be the basis for these mass
confiscations. Gun owners will be supplied documentation by the BATF
showing which pieces have been confiscated so that in the future,
they will be told, they can recover their weapons when the state of
emergency has passed. In actuality, weapons that do not have a high
value or are not suitable for arming loyalist police forces, will be
destroyed by order
This
study is available from tbrnews at
$5.00
by PayPal
The
Voice of the White House
Washington,
D.C., January 15, 2010: “I keep returning to the subject of the
Peoples’ Republic of China but now we have more delinquencies to
report on for your entertainment
Our
relations with the Celestials has not been an easy one for the
public but a delight for all of the American businesses who have
their products made, by what is essentially dirt cheap slave labor,
in that country. How can I count the ways I love China?
- Pet
food sold in America that poisoned, and usually killed, about
30,000 American dogs and cats. I turned out to be full of
harmful chemicals. The Chinese were horrified, apologized and
shot a few plant people.
- Toothpaste
that was filled with more harmful chemicals and which killed a
number of people in Central America. The Chinese were horrified
and shot a few plant people.
- Toys
for children, made in China, were covered with lead paint.
Children often put such small toys into their months and lead
can do great damage to them. The Chinese were horrified and shot
a few plant people.
- The
Chinese have been, and still are, cranking out billions of
dollars worth of fake American gold and silver coins, coins
which major coin companies are gleefully stuffing into a sucker
public. The Chinese know about this but, as the money is
welcome, have done nothing about it.
- Chinese-built
computers have a number of “bugs” built into them and at any
time, without even leaving their offices, the Chinese
governmental experts can easily look into any such computer,
especially if it ends up in a high-level U.S. government agency
or, more important, an important American business. In either
case, what we know, the Chinese know. This has not been
discussed with the Chinese.
- Fish
products labeled ‘Made in China’ should under no
circumstances be eaten. Shrimp, oysters and so on are
“farmed” in the coastal areas of China, near their river
systems that are jammed with very harmful chemicals dumped into
the waters up river by cost-cutting Chinese businessmen. If you
eat any of such products of highly contaminated waters, be sure
to have your will in order and up to date.
- Plasterboard
coming from China by the container full was used extensively in
this country and later turned out to be highly toxic, mainly
because the filler was taken from industrial waste sites. How
clever of the Celestials to dump their toxic waste outside their
country and, even better, to make a profit!
- Counterfeit
parts for cars and aircraft;, purporting to be the product of
reputable American firms, that are made of cheap metals and used
to fall apart, often with very serious, and in the part of
commercial aircraft, fatal results.
Now, we
have another happy report about our business rivals. It has been
rumored for some time that gold bars (400
oz or 12.5 kg gold bricks) bearing
the markings of the United States Mint were somehow adulterated and
worthless. These have been showing up in banks and other
institutions in Britain, Switzerland, France, Sweden, Iran, the UAE,
India, Brunei, Italy and a number of other countries. These gold
bars, all with American markings, are not gold. Instead, they are
made of tungsten and then heavily gold-plated. Gold cost $12,000 per
pound and tungsten costs $10 a pound.
Density
Name Symbol
Atomic number
19.32
Gold
Au
79
19.35
Tungsten
W 74
In
early 2008 millions of dollars in gold at the central bank of
Ethiopia turned out to be fake. What were supposed to be bars of
solid gold turned out to be nothing more than gold-plated tungsten.
When this counterfeiting was discovered, the Ethiopians tried to
pass this off on South Africa and recouop their money, the shipment
was promptly returned as “unacceptable.” Rumors were quietly
spreading about this counterfeit money. It was alleged that these
bars, which had been showing up in huge numbers throughout the
world, all purported to be coming from the United States Treasury
and bore their markings. Most
of these billions of dollars of passable fakes came from China
originally so when the rumors began to spread to the financial
world, the Chinese, even clever, came up with a background cover
story:
Background
Cover Story
In
October of 2009 the Chinese received a shipment of gold bars. Gold
is regularly exchanged between countries to pay debts and to settle
the so-called balance of trade. Most gold is exchanged and stored in
vaults under the supervision of a special organization based in
London, the London Bullion Market Association (or LBMA).
When
the shipment was received, the Chinese government asked that special
tests be performed to guarantee the purity and weight of the gold
bars. In this test, four small holed are drilled into the gold bars
and the metal is then analyzed.
Officials
were ‘shocked to learn that the bars were fake.’ They contained
cores of tungsten with only a outer coating of real gold. What’s
more, these gold bars, containing serial numbers for tracking,
originated in the US and had been stored in Fort Knox for years.
There were reportedly between 5,600 to 5,700 bars, weighing 400 oz.
each, in the shipment!
At
first many gold experts assumed the fake gold originated in China,
the world’s best knock-off producers. The Chinese were quick to
investigate and issued a statement that implicated the US in the
scheme. Through their American supporters and the irresponsible
hysterical bloggers throughout the world and their disniformational
report was that roughly 15 years ago — during the Clinton
Administration [think Robert Rubin, Sir Alan Greenspan and Lawrence
Summers] — between 1.3 and 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten blanks were
allegedly manufactured by a very high-end, sophisticated refiner in
the USA [more than 16 Thousand metric tonnes]. Subsequently, 640,000
of these tungsten blanks received their gold plating and were
shipped to Ft. Knox and remain there to this day.
According
to the Chinese ‘investigation’, the balance of this 1.3 million
to 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten cache was also gold plated and then
allegedly “sold” into the international market. Apparently, the
global market is literally “stuffed full of 400 oz salted bars”.
Perhaps as much as 600-billion dollars worth.
There is no rational reason why the United States would
embark on such a program of counterfeiting which was bound to be
eventually discovered but every reason for the crooks in Beijing to
both reap huge rewards in purchases of badly-needed natural
resources for next to nothing while at the same time badly damaging
the image of the United States. China is an economic war with this
country. She sells us dangerous products, counterfeits our coinage,
and is trying to flood
this country with very cheap products in order to destroy our
business infrastructure and compel us to depend upon China for our
goods. They are practicing the same thing throughout the world but
like all cons, they have gone too far and too long and very soon,
their glittering house of cards, paid for by the proceeds of
criminal activities, will cave in on them. Economic sanctions
against China are now in process but in the United States, this is a
difficult subject, due, in the main, to the fact that American
manufacturing business is so deeply involved with Chinese cheap
products that a boycott or other economic measure, would seriously
cut into their profits. We can boycott China, along with the EU
(which is working on this very seriously) but the damage this nation
of crooks has done, and is continuing to do, to the financial world
is so serious as to constitute an genuine casus belli. Let’s do it
now and get it over with.”
.
As
China Rises, Fears Grow on Whether Boom Can Endure
January 11, 2010
by
Michael Wines
New
York Times
BEIJING
— As much of the world struggles to clamber out of a serious recession,
a gradual flow of economic power from West to East has turned into a
flood.
New
high points, it seems, are reached daily. China
surged past the United States to become the world’s largest
automobile market — in units, if not in dollars, figures released
Monday show. It also toppled Germany as the biggest exporter of
manufactured goods, according to year-end trade data. World
Bank estimates suggest that China — the world’s
fifth-largest economy four years ago — will shortly overtake Japan
to claim the No. 2 spot.
The
shift of economic gravity to China has occurred partly because
growth here remained robust even as the world’s developed
economies suffered the steepest drop in trade and economic output in
decades.
But
that did not happen by chance: China’s decisive government
intervention in the economy, combined with the defiant optimism of
its companies and consumers, has propelled an economy that until
recently had seemed tethered to the health of its major export
markets, including the United States.
Beijing’s
state-run news media, indulging in a moment of self-congratulation,
have hailed China’s new economic prominence as proof of national
superiority.
The
country’s economic miracle, the newspaper People’s Daily boasted
last week, exists because its leaders — unlike those in other,
unnamed nations — can make quick decisions and ensure underlings
carry them out. The Great Recession, the newspaper said, has laid
bare cracks in plodding Western-style capitalism.
Yet
China confronts a number of challenges about its recent surge,
including whether its formula for growth is sustainable, and how it
will manage its increasingly strained economic relations with the
outside world. Those are likely to prove challenging issues for a
leadership unaccustomed to making policy under an international
spotlight.
Sustaining
a global-size economy is nowhere near as simple as building one,
some Chinese and Western economists say. As the Chinese navigate
toward a bigger role in the world financial system, they are already
running into diplomatic and political headwinds.
At
home, ordinary citizens and economists alike worry that the
government’s decision to flood the economy with cash has created
speculative bubbles — in housing, in lending — that could burst
with disastrous effect. But curbing speculation requires moves, such
as raising interest rates, that could crimp the sprees of investment
and industrial expansion that are the main contributors to growth.
Abroad,
the pressure on China to revalue its currency, the renminbi, is
strengthening, and it seems sure to intensify after trade statistics
released Sunday showed that China’s yearlong downturn in export
growth reversed in December. Keeping the renminbi fixed at a low
rate against the
dollar boosts China’s exports and its economy. But
increasingly, it angers its trade partners.
China
once could wave off complaints about its currency policies, arguing
that it was a developing nation entitled to a bit of slack from its
Western customers. But with the world’s fastest-growing economy
— and more than $2 trillion in foreign reserves — that argument
looks increasingly untenable.
“At
a time when you’ve got 10 percent unemployment in the U.S. and a
very slow and gradual global recovery — and China seems to be
skyrocketing — the pressure on the Chinese to change some of these
policies, including the exchange-rate policy, is really going to
grow this year,” said Nicholas Consonery, a China analyst at
Eurasia Group, a New York-based political risk research firm.
In
theory, China’s growing economic clout should benefit everyone: in
an interconnected world, growing trade creates jobs and money
everywhere.
“China’s
extremely important, no doubt about it. And over all, the more
important China becomes, the better it is for the American
economy,” Scott Kennedy, who heads the Research Center for Chinese
Politics and Business at Indiana
University, said in an interview.
That
Shanghai-assembled iPod, Mr. Kennedy said, is the product of
American research and design and marketing, and most of the proceeds
from its sale go back into American coffers. But China’s rise also
poses new risks both for Beijing and for its trading partners.
Its
largely bruise-free journey through last year’s economic crisis
aside, not everyone is convinced that Beijing has eliminated threats
to its financial and economic health.
Hit
hard by an initial drop in exports that was frighteningly steep for
a leadership that has long promised and delivered fast growth, China
poured $585 billion in stimulus money into its domestic economy.
Officials also ordered state-run banks to increase their lending by
double that amount, triggering a spree of easy money that created
jobs for migrant factory workers and fueled rises in the price of
assets, like stocks and real estate.
Some
experts fear that too much of the stimulus money was put into
unprofitable projects and bad loans that will be exposed in a few
years. In that view, China’s 2009 boom, in which automakers sold
nearly 14 million cars and trucks, and housing prices doubled, is
really a sign of an overheated economy at risk of serious recession
down the road.
Judged
by the numbers, China’s economy still looks robust. In Beijing,
officials said, per capita gross domestic product is expected to
exceed $4,000 this year, a 10 percent jump from 2009. Last month,
the value of China’s exports leaped by nearly a third over the
same month in 2008 — and imports jumped 55 percent, pointing
toward growth in manufacturing.
But
a Chinese economic crisis, which could have been shrugged off a few
years ago, would be a considerably more serious event in a world in
which Beijing runs the second-largest economy.
The
government appears concerned. Last week, the
central bank edged up the rate on an often-watched
interbank loan, the first such hike in five months. That seemed to
signal concern that the economy was expanding too quickly.
Many
experts see few signs of immediate danger. After all, they note,
China has gone on splurges before — building too many steel mills,
and too many office buildings — only to see the nation’s
breakneck growth sop up the excess capacity. With nearly a billion
people still clawing to advance beyond peasant status, they say,
China’s growth story has many chapters ahead.
Mr.
Kennedy, the Indiana University expert, said he was less certain
that endless growth is such a panacea. “No one defies economic
laws,” he said. “Eventually you get it, whether you want it or
not.”
'Made in China' gets a new
gloss
January 15, 2010
By
Benjamin A Shobert
Asia
Times
We have become so desensitized to defective products
originating in China that this week's announcement from the US
Consumer Product Safety Commission about finding dangerous levels of
cadmium in children's toys seemed oddly expected and has thus far
ruffled few feathers.
Yet, while this particular issue may not be significant
enough to upend the trade relationship between the US and China, or
of such severity that it is likely to be the cause of a whole new
set of import restrictions, it does add more weight to an increasing
wariness
and frustration with Chinese-made products on the part of American
consumers.
The cumulative effect of these quality problems has the
potential not only to impact the export-sensitive economy of China,
but to create a systemic problem for what it means to have products
of any variety sourced in China, an issue that could cause problems
for an untold number of American and European consumer-product
companies, as well as the retailers they serve.
In a series of television ads that started late last year
with limited runs on CNN Asia, and now spreading to various media
outlets around the world, Beijing seems to have acknowledged these
fears, with a new ad program defending what it means to be
"Made in China". The new ads go by the tag line "Made
in China, Made with the World".
The advertisements are sponsored primarily by the Ministry of
Commerce, in conjunction with four Chinese trade groups, and are
developed by DDB Guoan-Beijing. Through them, the Chinese government
appears to be acknowledging that the China brand is suffering from
these repeated product quality problems and may need a global media
campaign to prevent further damage.
Global marketing on the part of a country in the face of such
a mounting set of negative publicity is extremely rare. The ads
themselves have been in the works for some time, but the launch of
the campaign appears with stories of tainted milk still lingering in
people's memories.
Should further quality problems present themselves in other
industries, the country could well face a collective and
insurmountable disgust at what it means to have products sourced in
China, with customers of Chinese manufacturers choosing to pay
higher prices in order to avoid the "Made in China".
Unlikely though such a scenario might seem, the very presence of the
ads seems to reinforce the concern that the potential consequences
could be severe. The net effect of a shifting tide of popular
opinion could be more devastating than all but the most onerous of
trade wars.
The TV ad begins by showing runners on their way through a
park, and as one runner ties his shoe, the tongue of his running
shoe can be seen bearing a label that reads: "Made in China
with American Sports Technology". A home of distinctly European
taste is the ad's next scene, with a refrigerator whose interior
label states: "Made in China with European Styling".
Teenagers listening to music at a bus stop are next up, shown
holding an MP3 player that bears the imprint "Made in China
with Software from Silicon Valley".
The flash from a photographer is the next to last, as
clothing models have their pictures taken, with a peak of the inside
label from one garment showing "Made in China with French
Designers". And last, a businessman on an airplane looks out of
his window to see a jet engine bearing the black lettering
"Made in China with Engineers from around the World". The
ad's primary slogan, "When it says Made in China, it really
means 'Made in China, Made with the World'", ends the 30-second
piece.
The products in question are interesting choices, ranging
from the lowest technology (garment manufacturing) to the most
popular of consumer products (the MP3 player, as shown in the spot a
model curiously reminiscent of the iPod Nano), to one of the highest
technology products that touches the average consumer's life, an
airplane engine.
This part of the ad works both for the benefit of the China
brand as well as to its detriment: undoubtedly the ad's designers
hoped that by showing the breadth of products made in China,
consumers would be reminded of how infrequently they encounter
problems. At the same time, the ad may provoke an uncomfortable
realization on the part of the consumer that they have no grasp of
where the next quality problem from China could present itself. As
the ad illustrates, given the sheer number and variety of products
made in China, shielding yourself against Chinese-made products is
all but impossible.
While the production value of the advertisement is not fully
to Western standards, it is on the whole not poor; the overall
effect on the part of the viewer is mixed. The ability to think
strategically enough to understand the role such a global ad
campaign needs to play in calming fears about what the
"China" brand means suggests a responsive and somewhat
sophisticated government. To be able to put out a coordinated
program, strategically designed to talk to some of the most
influential TV watchers, is well thought out. On the other hand, the
ad has a twinge of what comes across almost as an inferiority
complex, the entirety of the "China" brand reduced to that
of being a passive manufacturer of the world's products.
It is a curious combination that may not create the desired
effect, and it is an admission on the part of China that its role in
the global economy is not that of creator or innovator, but as that
of a factory. At its best, this ad seems to suggest that China
wishes to remind the world of what it does well, in an extremely
wide range of products. At the same time, it provokes the watcher to
recall the interconnectedness between country's production capacity
and global business. At its worst, the ad reinforces the idea of
China as only a factory, capable of low-cost production and little
else.
In a week that has seen one of America's technology leaders,
Google, stand up to the Chinese government with a threat to withdraw
from the country if the company cannot run an uncensored search site
there, it is useful to reflect on whether we may have overstated the
position of dominance enjoyed by Beijing.
The "Made in China, Made with the World" ad
campaign is not a move born of strength; rather it is an admission
that the "China" brand currently carries many weaknesses
and is still quite vulnerable. The fact that much of the developed
world is questioning its own economic models further complicates a
balanced diagnosis on China's real versus perceived strengths. Among
the implicit admissions made in this ad by the Chinese government
itself is that China needs the world as much as the world needs
China, a reminder which again communicates strength, mutual
reliance, and some weakness.
In its own way, this ad may also serve as a reminder that the
Chinese economy still has a lot of ground to cover if it is to
compete with Western businesses.
Without intending to do so, the ad should also provoke a
realization on the part of American and European companies that, in
order to stay competitive, they must remain vigilant on those
business practices that they do better than their peers, with
further emphasis on research, product development, and consumer
marketing.
However clumsy some may believe this ad campaign to be, it
does reflect an awareness at the highest levels in China that the
country must pay attention to, and work to create influence on,
consumers' perceptions. As with many developments in China, once the
government has shown this to be a necessary step, industry will soon
follow.
For all the emphasis on Chinese businesses and their role in
export markets, those companies who have truly separated themselves
and built their own autonomous brands in export economies are
extremely rare, few if any being known outside the circles of
business professionals or China industry watchers. Consequently, the
"China" brand, if it exists at all, exists as a
country-of-origin locator, and is not tied to any particular product
or industry. This is undoubtedly why such a concerted media campaign
was deemed necessary: if consumers know only the most global version
of the "China" brand, and relate it to the numerous and
mounting stories of defective products, they will begin to make
purchasing decisions to avoid Chinese-made products.
In addition, as the recession or near-recession in America
drags out, more US-based companies looking for a marketing advantage
may determine that sourcing domestically provides a short-term
benefit that outweighs the cost savings of having product
manufactured in China. The current faint cries for "Made in the
USA" branded products could begin to build, leaving the
"Made in China" brand to face not only baggage related to
poor-quality products, but a spirit of economic nationalism in the
US.
From Beijing's perspective, it makes enormous sense now to
reach out and try to speak directly to American consumers, reminding
them not only of the benefits they enjoy from their Chinese-made
products, but the degree to which American companies rely on Chinese
manufacturing.
At a time when the certainty of globalization's
interconnectedness is being questioned, this television
advertisement argues that the world benefits from China's productive
capacity and that on balance China has earned the world's trust. But
the mere fact that Beijing feels it must launch a concerted ad
campaign to make these points suggests that many outside China feel
quite the opposite, and that its position of strength is not as firm
or all-encompassing as some might suggest.
Benjamin A Shobert is the managing director of Teleos Inc
(www.teleos-inc.com), a consulting firm dedicated to helping Asian
businesses bring innovative technologies into the North American
market.
Editors note: This article, without the attached
list, appeared in our last issue and the list appeared in the most
recent edition of the Slaughterhouse Informer. We are reprinting
this, along with the partial listing of government snitches, for our
reader’s enjoyment…and warning.
The Amercan Gestapo
January
9, 2010
by
Dr.Peter Janney
If imitation is the sincerest form
of flattery, then the few surviving members of Hitler Gestapo, of
Secret State Police, should be gratified that their counterpart, the
Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation, has
copied, in detail, the so-called Vertrauns-Leute or V-Leute, program
and is now developing it into a very powerful, and relatively
unknown, internal surveillance force in the United States. Unlike
the Gestapo, who had Communists as their chief enemy to observe,
infiltrate and destroy, the FBI program is aimed solely at American
citizens who are considered as present, and future, threats to the
state.
Before we analyze the FBI program with its nearly sixty
thousand reporting members, let us briefly look at its father, the
Gestapo’s V program because in comparing Hitler’s secret
internal surveillance program with its huge network of volunteer
informers with the FBI program, the parallels will at once become
painfully obvious.
The Gestapo, or Geheime-Staats Polizei (Secret State
Police) was initially constructed from the political section of
Berlin’s civil police force in April of 1933. Given the intensive
Communist espionage in the lax Weimar Republic, a number of German
law enforcement agencies, such as the Berlin and Bavarian police,
had set up sections to deal with this menace.
In
Berlin, under the government of Prussia, Hermann Goering, its Prime
Minister, set up the Gestapo by enlarging the previous Geheimes
Staatspolizeiamt. In 1934, the SS, under Heinrich Himmler and
his top intelligence chief, Reinhard Heydrich (Head of the Sicherheitsdienst
or SD) assumed control over the Prussian, and later, Bavarian,
police. The small Gestapo was put under the control of one Heinrich
Müller, a top operative in the political police of Munich. Although
Müller had been a devoted enemy of the National Socialists, he was
considered by Heydrich as an extremely competent expert in detecting
and dealing with the Commniists and other dissident groups. Müller,
a member of the Catholic right-wing BVP, organized the small Berlin
intelligence agency into a highly competent and efficient arm of
detection and repression. With the outbreak of the war in September,
1939, all German police and political police agencies were put under
the umbrella of the RSHA (Reichssicherheitshauptamt…State
security main office) and the Gestapo, still under Müller,
constituted Amt IV (Bureau IV) of that agency. Although
nominally under the control of both Himmler and Heydrich, Müller, a
decorated WWI military pilot, was essentially independent and was in
complete control of his organization.
At its height, the Gestapo had offices in all the major, and
some of the minor, German cities but never had more than thirty-two
thousand personnel, to include office workers and field agents but
the effectiveness of the Gestapo lay not only in Müller’s
institution of an in-depth national card file on most German
citizens but in an enormous network of volunteer informers called
‘V-Leute’ or Vertrauens-Männer (Leute) or
trustworthy sources. Politically trustworthy supporters of the Nazi
movement were recruited as voluntary, unpaid, reporting sources and
could be found in all walks of German civilian and, to a lesser
degree, government and military, sectors. These ‘V-Leute’
were given special identity cards, assisted if possible by the
Gestapo in the event of civil or criminal legal problems and made
privy to various impressive but unimportant Gestapo information. The
value of this army of over 75,000 known domestic informers was,
without doubt, one of the reasons for the Gestapo’s successes
against internal dissident groups. Setting aside malicious
denunciations, the V-Leute kept the Gestapo field offices and
from them, the central headquarters on the Prinz Albrecht Strasse in
Berlin, with an enormous input of often very valuable information..
One of the positive aspects of the activities of this army of
domestic voluntary informers was the feeling among the German public
that the Gestapo was everywhere, even present, ever observant and
this fright quotient was often more than sufficient to quell any
anti government sentiments in most of the German population and created
a
`self-policing' society operating within a `consensus
dictatorship'
Here is a very brief outline of the structure of the Gestapo
that dealt with the input of information from the unpaid but very
effective ‘V-Leute’:
Amt
IV
Gegnerforschung
und
(Also known as the Geheime Staatspolizei)
Gegnerbekämpfung
Under SS-Gruppenführer Heinrich Müller
(Investigation
and combatting
of
Opposition)
IV
A 3
Gesellschaftsspionage
Combating
of espionage in society.
Fahrlässiger
Landesverrat
Treason through negligence,careless talk,etc.
Spionage
Combating of political espionage.
IV
A 6
Karteien
und Fahndung
(Card Indexes & Wanted Persons)
IV
A 6 a
Kartei
und Personalakten
Card Index, Personal Files
Auskunft
Heinrich Müller, the father of the informant program and the
head of the Gestapo almost since its inception, escaped from Germany
in 1945 and ended up in Switzerland where he worked as an expert on
Communist espionage until 1948 when he was recruited by the CIA’s
James Critchfield to work for the CIA, also as an expert in
Communist espionage. In
studying the current FBI program, it is very obvious that Müller
brought more to Washington than his hat and if the old adage that it
is lawful to be taught by an enemy is correct, our own form of the
Gestapo, the FBI, certainly and clearly benefited from Müller’s
organizational skills.
In 1996, the FBI set up an organization they called the
Infragard, which very closely followed the ‘V-Leute’
program:
, ….” the protection of our nation’s infrastructure
cannot be accomplished by the federal government alone. It requires
coordinated action from numerous stakeholders – including
government, the private sector, law enforcement and concerned
citizens.” And that: “Each
InfraGard chapter is geographically linked with an FBI Field Office,
providing all stakeholders immediate access to experts from law
enforcement, industry, academic institutions and other federal,
state and local government agencies”.
One of the publicly stated aims of this project is that:
“(b)y utilizing the talents and expertise of the InfraGard
network, information is shared to mitigate threats to our nation’s
critical infrastructures.” This is nearly identical in wording
to Müller’s own description of his national informers program and
what follows here was lifted, almost verbatim, from his own period
analysis: “An InfraGard member is a private-sector volunteer
with an inherent concern for national security. Driven to protect
their own industry and further motivated to share their professional
and personal knowledge to safeguard the country, InfraGard members connect
to a national network of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
communicate
with federal law enforcement and government agencies through their
local InfraGard chapters, and contribute
to the security and protection of our national infrastructure from
threats and attacks.”
“Critical infrastructures
are physical and cyber-based systems that are essential to the
minimum operations of the economy and the government (as defined in
Presidential Decision Directive/NSC 63, May 1998) Key resources
are individual targets whose destruction would not endanger security
on a national scales, but would create local disaster or profoundly
damage national morale (as defined in Homeland Security Presidential
Directive-7, December 2003) Together, critical infrastructures and
key resources are so vital that their incapacity or destruction
would have a debilitating impact on the defense, economic security,
public health or national confidence of the United States.
“InfraGard
has SMEs around the country in each of the following 17 categories
of critical infrastructures and key resources, as recognized by the
National Infrastructure Protection Plan:”
“Critical Infrastructures:
Agriculture
and Food
Banking
and Finance
Chemical
Defense
Industrial Base
Drinking
Water and Wastewater Treatment Systems
Emergency
Services
Energy
Information
Technology
National
Monuments and Icons
Postal
and Shipping
Public
Health and Healthcare
Telecommunications
Transportation
Systems”
In
additional similarity to the earlier Gestapo program of unpaid
informers, we learn that the current FBI imitation provides its
informers the following benefits:
“The
benefits of joining InfraGard include:
> Network with other companies that help maintain our national
infrastructure.
> Quick Fact: 350 of our nation's Fortune 500 have a
representative in InfraGard.
> Gain access to an FBI secure communication network complete
with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards and
much more.
> Learn time-sensitive, infrastructure related security
information from government sources such as DHS and the FBI.
> Get invitations and discounts to important training seminars
and conferences.
> Best of all, there is no cost to join InfraGard
Our 45000+
membership is voluntary yet exclusive and is comprised of
individuals from both the public and private sector. The main goal
of the Washington, DC Nations Capital Chapter of InfraGard is to
promote ongoing dialogue, education, community outreach and timely
communication between public and private members. Furthermore, to
achieve and sustain risk-based target levels of capability to
prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from all hazards
or events, and to minimize their impact on lives, property, and the
economy.
InfraGard members gain access to vital information and
education that enables them to in turn provide assistance to prevent
and address terrorism and other transnational crimes. InfraGard
members are provided threat advisories, alerts and warnings and
access to a robust secure web-VPN site and e-mail. InfraGard also
helps promote an effective liaison with local, state and federal
agencies, to include the Department of Homeland Security.
The FBI retained InfraGard as an FBI sponsored program, and
will work closely with DHS in support of the CIP mission. The FBI
will further facilitate InfraGard's continuing role in CIP
activities and further develop InfraGard's ability to support the
FBI's investigative mission, especially as it pertains to
counterterrorism and cyber crimes. The FBI and Department of
Homeland Security Office of Infrastructure Protection are currently
executing an InfraGard Partnership Program Plan under a Memorandum
of Understanding signed in December 2007.
Current Washington Field Office (WFO) cleared InfraGard
members are encouraged to register on the Cybercop ExtraNet Portal
to validate your affiliation with this chapter.”
There
are, of course, suggestions and support concepts available to the
informant organization as per this statement: “The interests of
InfraGard must be protected whenever presented to non-InfraGard
members. Independent of the type of presentation, (interview, brief,
or published documentation) the InfraGard leadership and the local
FBI representative should be made aware of the upcoming
presentation. The InfraGard member and the FBI representative should
agree on the theme of the presentation. The identity of InfraGard
members should be protected at all times.”
As of January 1, 2010, there are over 45,000 InfraGard
informants organized in 86
chapters in each of the 50 states, operating under the supervision
and control of local FBI agents Secretly, and not reported, are
branches in foreign countries, to include Britain, France, Italy and
Switzerland..
Given the proliferation of anti-government internet sites and
the even larger proliferation of conspiracy stories (many the result
of government disinfomation) a reader of the above material might
well be expected to dismissed most of it as mere self-serving
bombast on the part of persons with a desperate need to be
recognized. In response to these entirely legitimate observations,
perhaps it should be noted that the italicized quotations above were
taken directly from official sources and can be easily seen at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfraGard.
This lengthy article, an official overview on a site well-known
to be very friendly to governmental needs, is confirmation, not only
of the existence of this informant organization but, to a historian,
a terrifying parallel with the earlier, and very effective, Gestapo
program.
Who are the volunteer informers spying on their co-workers,
friends and neighbors? If a volunteer is approved by the FBI, they
can join InfraGard but the FBI has put special emphasis on persons
connected with the communications sector (to include computers and
manufacturers and developers of computer-oriented software and
equipment) which contains the major, and often minor,
telecommunications firms, national, and international,
credit reporting bureaus, the major American members of the
national, and international, banking systems, the American credit
card companies, American automobile manufacturers (who install GPS
or on-board vehicle tracking systems in their products) Internet
providers, (Internet II is owned and operated by the FBI) a
significant number of American Evangelical religious organizations
who are often over-eager in their efforts to inform on Unbelieving
neighbors, friends and co-workers, the hotel and motel industry, the
airlines (whose information base of Americans traveling is
considered highly important) and even companies who sell boats and
private aircraft. Also, and far more alarming, are a number of
teachers, recruited into the service because of the often
unsophisticated parental remarks small children can be provoked into
repeating to the informant. But not all of these sources of
information are the sole purview of the FBI. The question arises as
to whether the FBI is alone in its intensive spying on the American
public and the response unfortunately is that they are only part of
the picture of growing, invasive domestic spying.
There has grown up in the United State, an enormous
infrastructure of agencies designed solely to spy on the American
public and a discussion of some of these might now be in order.
First, and foremost, there is the National
Security Agency
(NSA)
Created by President Truman in 1952, during the Korean War, the NSA
is charged with protecting the United States from foreign security
threats. The agency was considered so secret that for years the
government refused to even confirm its existence. Government
insiders used to joke that NSA stood for "No Such Agency
Since early 1996, the National Security Agency has been
secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of
Americans, using data voluntarily provided by AT&T, Verizon and
BellSouth,. The NSA also down-loads any and all information gleaned
from its control, or penetration, of global communications
satellites. In a word, the NSA can, and does, automatically record
all overseas telephone conversations for all sources. It is the goal
of the NSA to “create a database of every call ever made” by or
to any American resident. To achieve this end, and it should be
noted that Müller’s Gestapo had identical systems in place during
the life of the Third Reich. This also includes bank transfer
information, diplomatic traffic and other interesting information. The
Bush administration used the NSA to spy on U.N. diplomats in New
York before the invasion of Iraq..President Bush and other top
officials in his administration used the National Security Agency to
secretly wiretap the home and office telephones and monitor private
email accounts of members of the United Nations Security Council in early
2003. As well as the diplomatically-secure UN, the
National Security Agency (NSA), on the orders of the Bush
administration, eavesdropped on the private conversations and e-mail
of its own employees, employees of other U.S. intelligence agencies
-- including the CIA and DIA -- and their contacts in the media,
Congress, and oversight agencies and offices.
AT&T
, once the sole national provider of telephone service, merged with
SBC and kept the AT&T name. Verizon, BellSouth and AT&T are
the nation's three biggest telecommunications companies; between
them they provide local and wireless phone service to more than 200
million customers.
The three
carriers control vast networks with the latest communications
technologies. They provide an array of services: local and
long-distance calling, wireless and high-speed broadband, including
video. Their direct access to millions of homes and businesses has
them uniquely positioned to help the government keep tabs on the
calling habits of Americans.
Although under Section 222 of the Communications Act, first
passed in 1934, telephone companies are prohibited from giving out
information regarding their customers' calling habits: violations of
Federal law are quite acceptable, if carried out by official stool
pigeons and with grateful acceptance. Also, all incoming calls, as
well as wireless calls, are subject to being covered.
The financial penalties for violating Section 222, one of
many privacy reinforcements that have been added to the law over the
years, can be stiff. The Federal Communications Commission, the
nation's top telecommunications regulatory agency, can levy fines of
up to $130,000 per day per violation, with a cap of $1.325 million
per violation. The FCC has no hard definition of
"violation." In practice, that means a single
"violation" could cover one customer or 1 million and the
NSA has made clear that it was willing to pay for the cooperation.
AT&T, which at the time was headed by C. Michael Armstrong,
agreed to help the NSA. So did BellSouth, headed by F. Duane
Ackerman; SBC, headed by Ed Whitacre; and Verizon, headed by Ivan
Seidenberg.have proven to be gold mines of intimate secrets for the
FBI. Although several lawsuits have been filed against these
cooperating communication giants, they have all been quickly
dismissed by cooperative Federal judged before they could get to the
potentially dangerous discovery process whereby unwelcome
information could become public
The
Office of Terrorism Analysis
supports
the National Counterterrorism Center in the Office of the Director
of National Intelligence. See CIA
transnational anti-terrorism activities. Previously, the
Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) oversaw the Intelligence
Community, serving as the president's principal intelligence
advisor, additionally serving as head of the CIA. The DCI's title
now is "Director of the Central Intelligence Agency" (DCIA),
serving as head of the CIA.
At the present time, the CIA reports to the Director of
National Intelligence. Prior to the establishment of the DNI, the
CIA reported to the President, with informational briefings to
congressional committees. The National
Security Advisor is a permanent member of the National
Security Council, responsible for briefing the President with
pertinent information collected by all US intelligence agencies,
including the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement
Administration, etc. All sixteen acknowledged Intelligence Community
agencies (and five more whose names and activities are considered to
be too secret to divulge) are under the authority of the Director of
National Intelligence.
The
National
Clandestine Service
(NCS)
(formerly known as the Directorate of Operations) is the main United
States intelligence
agency for coordinating human
intelligence (HUMINT) services. The organization absorbed
the entirety of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA)'s Directorate of Operations,
and also coordinates HUMINT between the CIA and other agencies,
including, but not limited to, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, the Diplomatic
Security Service, Defense
Intelligence Agency, Air
Intelligence Agency, Army
Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), Marine
Corps Intelligence Activity, and Office
of Naval Intelligence. The current Director of the NCS is
Michael
Sulick. The Director of the NCS reports to the CIA
Director.
The creation of the NCS was officially announced in a press
release on 13 October 2005.[1]
The NCS was created by a bill from US
Senator Pat
Roberts in the wake of the September
11, 2001 attacks. The investigation by the 9/11
Commission reported that HUMINT had been severely
degraded in the past two decades, principally because of the end of
the Cold
War and because of startling revelations about CIA
operations uncovered by the investigations of the Church
Committee of the US
Senate.
The NCS has analogues in the National
Security Agency (signals
intelligence), the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the Defense
Intelligence Agency.
The
final version of the anti-terrorism legislation, the ‘Uniting and
Strengthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required To
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism’ (H.R.
3162, the "USA PATRIOT Act") puts the Central
Intelligence Agency back in the business of spying on Americans. It
permits a vast array of information gathering on U.S. citizens from
school records, financial transactions*, Internet activity,
telephone conversations, information gleaned from grand jury
proceedings and criminal investigations to be shared with the CIA
(and other non-law enforcement officials) even if it pertains to
Americans. The information would be shared without a court order.
The bill also gives the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,
acting in his capacity as head of the Intelligence Community,
enormous power to manage the collection and dissemination of
intelligence information gathered in the U.S. This new authority
supercedes existing guidelines issued to protect Americans from
unwarranted surveillance by U.S. agencies such as the FBI.
The
National
Security Service
(NSS) within the Federal
Bureau of Investigation
was created June 29, 2005, by President George
W. Bush through the Executive
Order (EO) entitled "Blocking
Property of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators and Their
Supporters."
Gary
M. Bald, Director
Philip
Mudd,
Deputy Director
The basis for the creation of a National Security Service is
documented in the FBI paper "National
Security: FBI or MI-5?" from the "Report of the
Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States
Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, Chapter 10: Intelligence at
Home: The FBI, Justice, and Homeland Security, pp. 466-67, March 31,
2005."
The National Security Service "pulls together the
Counterintelligence Division, the Counterterrorism Division, and the
Directorate of Intelligence, enabling it to act together to develop
intelligence and then to act on that intelligence, in consultation
with not only Department
of Justice but also the Director of National Intelligence
(DNI)." June 29, 2005, DoJ Briefing Paper.
Also see: Memorandum:
"Strengthening the Ability of the Department of Justice to Meet
Challenges to the Security of the Nation," White
House, June 29, 2005.
TALON
is the acronym for Threat
and Local Observation Notice.
"To track alleged ‘domestic terrorist
threats against the military,’ the Pentagon
is created a new database that contained raw, non-validated' reports
of anomalous activities within the United States Talon was intended
to provide a means to gather and disseminate reports from volunteer
‘concerned citizens’
In 2002, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz "designated it as the DoD “standard for
reporting suspicious activity.” The Department
of Homeland Security, ever eager to enlarge it own
domestic citizenry files, declared that; “ TALON as a template
within the emerging Protect
America homeland defense information sharing system."
"Talon reports grew out of a program called Eagle Eyes,
an anti-terrorist program established by the Air Force Office of
Special Investigations that 'enlists the eyes and ears of Air Force
members and citizens in the war on terror,' according to the
program's Web site. A Pentagon spokesman recently described Eagle
Eyes as a 'neighborhood watch' program for military bases. The Air
Force inspector general newsletter in 2003 said program informants
include 'Air Force family members, contractors, off-base merchants,
community organizations and neighborhoods'," Walter Pincus reported
in the December 11, 2005, Washington Post.
In April
2007, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence requested that
the Secretary of Defense terminate the TALON program because the
results of the last year do not merit continuing the program as
currently constituted, particularly in light of its image in the
Congress and the media.
Operation
TIPS,
Terrorism Information and Prevention System, was a program
designed at the specific order of
President
George
W. Bush to have United
States citizens report suspicious activity on the part of
their co-workers, neighbors and family members. US workers who had
access to private citizens' homes, such as cable installers and
telephone repair workers, would be reporting on what was in people's
homes if it were deemed suspicious to them. A packet of what was
deemed suspicious was to be supplied to each informer. (A copy of
this is in the author’s possession and borders on the idiotic) The
United
States Postal Service, after at first supportive of the
program, later resisted its personnel being included in this
program, reasoning that if mail
carriers became perceived as law enforcement personnel
that they would be placed in danger at a level for which they could
not reasonably be expected to be prepared, and that the downside of
the program hence vastly outweighed any good that it could
accomplish. The National
Association of Letter Carriers, a postal labor
union, was especially outspoken in its opposition.
Although the TIPS program was officially cancelled in 2002, on June
30, 2008, the Denver
Post reported that 181 individuals, including police
officers, paramedics, firefighters, utility workers, and railroad
employees had been trained as Terrorism
Liaison Officers to report suspicious information which
could be signs of terrorist activity and that while Congress had
specifically forbidden its implementation, it was still very much
active. The article also stated that TLOs were already active in six
other states and the District
of Columbia.
Ed.
Here is a partial list of the Infragard Informer’s Friday
Night Chowder and Marching Society. There is a wealth of more
information which we will publish when it becomes available.
Alaska
·
Anchorage
Chapter
infragard-anchorage@infragard.org
Russ,
Mr. Virgil T. ICS, P.O. Box 6255, Gulf Shores, AL 36547
Arizona
·
Phoenix
Chapter
www.phoenixinfragard.net
infragard-phoenix@infragard.org
·
Southern
Arizona
E.G.
Kendrick Founder
Datatel, Inc.
Moy,
Robert S., 2934 North 22nd Pl., Phoenix, AZ 85016
Richards,
Jeff, 7180 Arcadia Lane, Yuma, AZ 85364
Lusby,
David, 1937 S. Abrego Dr., Green Valley, AZ 85614
Shaw,
Robert T., 12851 E. Speedway Tuscon, AZ 85748
Van
Loon, Ernest J., 5215 North 33rd St., Phoenix, AZ 85018
Selgrat,
George S., 11426 N. Balboa Dr., Sun City, AZ 85351
Reed,
Daniel E., 6774 E. Paseo Penoso, Tucson, AZ 85715
Kovacevich,
Mrs. Ruth, 4800 N. 68th St., No 142, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
Tschudy,
Dr. James, 3030 West Foothills Way, Flagstaff, AZ 86001
Rockhill,
Charles D. Jr., 3382 W. Camino De Amigos, Tucson, AZ 85746
Jilli,
Edmund, 8700 N. La Cholla No 2134, Tucson, AZ 85741
Lapham,
Lewis, 65710 E. Desert Trail Dr., Tucson, AZ 85737
Moses,
Dr. Elbert, 2001 Rocky Dells Dr., Prescott, AZ 86303
Arkansas
·
Little
Rock Chapter
Jay
Allen Sr. Vice President Corporate Affairs Wal-Mart
Robert
Madison Murphy Founder
Murphy Oil Corp.
Whitehead,
Harvey A. , P.O. Box 572, Palmer, AK 99645
California
·
Los
Angeles Chapter
·
San
Diego Chapter
·
Sacramento
Chapter
·
San
Francisco Chapter
Roland
Arnall Chairman
Ameriquest Capital Corp.
Edward
G. Atsinger III
CEO & President
Salem Communications
Frank
E. Baxter Chairman &
CEO Jefferies & Co.
Herbert
F. Boeckmann II
President Galpin
Motors
Steven
A. Burd President, Chairman & CEO
Safeway, Inc.
Wen
Pin Chang President Trade Union International
Deepak
Chopra President & CEO
OSI Systems Inc
Dwight
W. Decker Chairman
& CEO Conexant
Systems, Inc.
Charles
E. DuPont Jr.
President Charles
DuPont Co.
Dale
Dykema Chairman & CEO TD
Service Financial
Matt
Fong President Strategic Advisory Group
Stephen
E. Frank Chairman, CEO & President
Southern California Edison
Robert
E. Grady Managing
Director, Carlyle Venture Partners
Carlyle Group
Robert
A. Kotick Chair & CEO Activision
E.
Floyd Kvamme Partner Emeritus Kleiner
Perkins Caufield & Byers
David
H. Murdock Chairman & CEO Dole
Food Co.
Palmer
N. Murray Morgan
Stanley
Jerry
Perenchio Chairman & CEO Univision Communications
Gregory
Slayton CEO
Slayton Capital
Marc
I. Stern TCW Group President Trust
Co.of the West
Jerry
Weintraub Producer Warner Brothers
Joe
M. Weller Chairman & CEO Nestle USA
Addicott,
Kenneth F., General Delivery, Carmel, CA 93921
Allen,
Andrew E., 122 Pepper Ave, Larkspur, CA 94939
Atwell,
Joan D., 918 Siskiyou Dr., Menlo Park, CA 94025
Yu,
David C.L., 2510 Morning Sun Dr., Hilltop Village Richmond, CA 94806
Colorado
·
Denver
www.denverinfragard.org/
Adnet,
Jacques J., 4515 Diamondback Dr., Colorado Springs, CO 80921
Bruce
D. Benson Chair
& President Benson
Mineral Group
Johnson,
William R., 317 Foxtail Ct., Boulder, CO 80303
Mondani,
Eugene, 3024 West Springlake Circle, Colorado Springs, CO 80906
McMichael,
John, 10346 S. Horizon View, Morrison, CO 80465
Connecticut
·
www.infragard-ct.org
Mr.
Jonathan Bush CEO & President Riggs Investment Management Co.
George
A.L. David CEO & Chairman United
Technologies Corp.
Mr.
Patrick J. Durkin Managing
Director Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.
Mr.
Roger A. Enrico Ex-Chairman
& Ex-CEO PepsiCo
Edward
D. Kratovil Vice
President UST, Inc
Patten,
James S., P.O. Box 1321, Torrington, CT 06790
Delaware
·
www.deinfragard.org
Florida
·
Jacksonville
Chapter
www.infragard-jax.org
·
Miami
Chapter
www.infragardsfl.org
·
Tampa
Chapter
infragard-tampa@infragard.org
·
Tallahassee
Chapter
www.tallahasseeinfragard.org
·
Pensacola
Chapter
www.infragard-nwfl.org
rcochran@leo.gov
·
Orlando
Chapter
infragard-tampa@infragard.org
James
J. Blosser Lobbyist Poole McKinley & Blosser
C.
David Brown II
Chairman Broad &
Cassel
Alvin
R. Carpenter Vice
Chairman CSX Transportation
Robert
Edward Coker Senior
Vice President Public Affairs U.S. Sugar Corp.
Husein
A. Cumber Assistant Vice President Public Affairs Florida East Coast
Industries
Mr.
Richard M. DeVos Co-founder
Alticor, Inc. (formerly Amway)
J.
Nelson Fairbanks Retired
President & CEO U.S. Sugar Corp.
Todd
S. Farha Chairman & CEO WellCare Health Plans, Inc.
David
Hart Finance Director WellCare Health Plans, Inc.
Tramm
Hudson Executive Vice President Provident Bank of Florida
Manuel
D. Medina CEO & Chairman Terremark Worldwide
Clinton
Pownall CEO Computer Bus Consultants, Inc.
George
C. Zoley Chairman & CEO Wackenhut Corrections Corp.
Ztimbrum,
William F., 3442 14th St., N. Naples, FL 33940
Alden,
Sygmund, P.O. Box 611374, Miami, FL 33161
Bush,
Lester E., 2004 Michigan Ave., NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33703
Georgia
·
Atlanta
Chapter
www.infragardatlanta.org
·
Savannah
Chapter
www.infragardcoastalempire.org
·
John
D. Carswell insurance
Marsh USA, Inc.
Fred
E. Cooper Chairman Cooper
Capital
James
C. Edenfield Co-founder
American Software
Dwight
H. Evans Executive Vice President Southern Company
Otis
B. Ingram III
President Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co
Equifax
PO Box 105873 Atlanta GA 30348
Hawaii
·
Honolulu
Chapter
www.infragardhawaii.org/
Roberts,
George, 47868 Kamehameha Highway, Kaneohe, Oahu, Hi 96744
Smith,
David R., 1717 Mott-Smith Dr., No 2911, Honolulu, HI 96822
Idaho
·
Boise
Chapter
dominic.venturi@infragard.org
Illinois
·
Chicago
Chapter
·
Springfield
Chapter
infragard-illinois.org
Robert
N. Burt Chairman & CEO FMC Corp.
John
A. Canning Chairman & CEO Madison Dearborn Partners
Samuel
K. Skinner Retired Chairman & CEO U.S. Freightways Corp.
William
H. Strong Vice Chairman & Managing Director Morgan Stanley
Hiscott,
George E., 1745 Spruce Ave., Highland Park, IL 60035
Sierros,
Steve N., 9312 69th Ave., Oak Lawn, IL 60453
Shonkweiler,
John P., 307 Pitt County Courthouse, Monticello, IL 61856
Mainardi,
Mrs. Marilyn, 1402 ½ Central Ave., No 305, Evanston, IL 60201
Indiana
·
Fort
Wayne Chapter
www.infragard-nei.net
·
Indianapolis
Chapter
New chapter website coming soon
Stephen
Goldsmith Senior Vice President Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Todd
Huston Director of Business Operations Komputrol
Owens,
John P., 519 South 10th St., Elkhart, IN 46516
Minnick,
Wendell, 427 South 31st St., Terre Haute, IN 47803
Iowa
·
Des
Moines Chapter
Mr.
David Fisher Chairman & President Onthank Company
Darcy,
Thomas, 12821 Sunset Terrace, Clive, IA 50325
Kansas
·
Kansas
City Chapter
www.infragardkc.org
Morgan,
Ray, 6815 Flint St., Shawnee Mission, KS 66203
Klager,
Roy B. Jr., 3001 Hedgetree Ct., Wichita, KS 67226
Kentucky
·
Louisville
Chapter
www.infragardky.org
Robert
M. Duncan CEO
Inez Deposit Bank
Louisiana
·
Baton
Rouge Chapter -
·
Lafayette
Chapter -
·
New
Orleans
www.infragard.net/chapters/neworleans
Melton,
H. Keith, P.O. Box 5755, Bossier City, LA 71171
Maine
·
http://infragard-me.org
Sleeper,
Francis H., 55 Lambert St. No 7, Portland, ME 04103
Sharp,
Frederick D., III 3 Fairwind Lane, Yarmouth, ME 04096
Maryland
·
Baltimore
Chapter
www.mdinfragard.net
·
Wilmington
Chapter
David
G. Albert Lobbyist
Park Strategies
Thomas
A. Allegretti President
American Waterways Operators
Jeffrey
S. Amling Managing Partner of Global Media Deutsche Bank
Stephen
G. Canton CEO
Teleglobe Buisness Solutions
Thomas
R. Kuhn President
Edison Electric Institute
Ansley,
Norman, 35 Cedar Rd., Severna Park, MD 21146
Massachusetts
·
Boston
Chapter
infragard-boston@infragard.org
http://www.infragard-boston.org
Stephen
Albano President
& CEO Offtech, Inc.
Mr.
Herbert F. Collins Chairman
Boston Capital Partners
Richard
J. Egan Chairman
EMC Corp.
Stephen
L. Guillard CEO
Harborside Healthcare
Bracebridge
H. Young Jr.
Partner Mariner Investment Group
Townsend,
Patrick L., 93 Winfield Rd., Holden, MA 01520
Michigan
·
Detroit
Chapter
Robert
Liggett Chairman
Liggett Communications
Andrea
Fisher Newman Senior
Vice President Government Affairs Northwest Airlines
Peter
Secchia Chairman
Universal Forest Products
Paul
F. Welday President
Strategic Public Affairs
Minnesota
·
Minneapolis
Chapter
Rudy
Boschwitz Chairman
Home Valu
William
McGuire Chairman & CEO UnitedHealth Group
Schoen,
Charles J., P.O. Box 33, Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Stefanson,
Randolph E., 428 So 8th St., Moorhead, MN 56560
Mississippi
·
Jackson
Chapter
infragard-jackson@infragard.org
Bill
J. Dore President
& CEO Global Industries
Sauls,
Dr. F. Clark, 201 Chesterfield Rd., Hattiesburg, MS 39402
Missouri
·
Jefferson
City Chapter
infragard.missouri.org.
·
Kansas
City Chapter
infragardkc.org
·
St.
Louis Chapter
Mr..
Stephen Brauer Chairman,
CEO Hunter Engineering
August
Busch III
Chairman & President Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc.
Mr.
William H. T. 'Bucky' Bush Chairman
Bush-O’Donnell Co.
Irl
Engelhardt CEO & Chairman Peabody
Energy Corp.
Raymond
Wagner Jr.Vice
President Legislative Affairs Enterprise
Rent-A-Car
Montana
·
infragard-su@fbi.gov
Sedoff,
Walter, 1013 Meadow Lane, Alberton, MT 59820
Thomson,
Dr. Fred W., 3009 Queen St., Missoula, MT 59801
Bessac,
Frank B., 1826 Traynor, Missoula, MT 59802
Weaver,
Robert W., 1910 36th St., Missoula, MT 59801
Nebraska
·
Omaha
Chapter
Duane
W. Acklie Chairman
Crete Carrier Corp.
Richard
K. Davidson Chairman,
CEO & President Union
Pacific Corp.
David
L. Sokol Chairman & CEO MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Murray,
Dr. Kent, 608 Forest Blvd., Hastings, NE 68901
Nevada
·
Sierra
Nevada
Chapter
·
Southern
Nevada Chapter
Sheldon
Adelson Chairman
Las Vegas Sands, Inc.
Charles
Mathewson Chairman
& CEO International Game Technology
Tilley,
Michie F., 16095 Rhyolite Circle, Reno, NV 89511
Mendez,
Orlando, P.O. Box 34574, Las Vegas, NV 89133
Patty,
Robert, 7180 Pah Rah Dr., Sparks, NV 89436
McCarthy,
Roger, 2054 Sutton Way, Henderson, NV 89014
New
Hampshire
·
infragard.boston@fbi.gov
Marshall,
Walter, 31 Durham St., Nashua, NH 03063
Schwenk,
George O., 177 Merriam Hill Rd., Mason, NH 03048
Halpin,
Daniel D., 9 Eastman Ave., Bedford, NH 03110
Sughrue,
Daniel F., P.O. Box 179, Concord, NH 03302
Dupre,
Robert, 28 Williams St., Salem, NH 03079
New
Jersey
·
Newark
Chapter
www.njinfragard.org
Lawrence
E. Bathgate II
Attorney Bathgate Wegener & Wolf
Robert
B. Chernin Vice President of TransportationCapacity Group
James
Courter CEO
IDT Corp.
James
C. Finkle President
CB Finkle Jr. Co.
Douglas
Forrester President
Benecard Services Inc.
Ellsworth
G. Havens Vice
President Corporate Development Englewood Hospital
Hon.
Gualberto Medina Vice
President International Affairs NET 2 PHONE
Thomas
A. Renyi Chairman & CEO Bank of New York
Joel
A. Schleicher Ex-Chair
& CEO Interpath
Balserio,
Aldo E., 1216 Kennedy Blvd., Union City, NJ 07087
New
Mexico
·
Albuquerque
Chapter
www.infragardnm.org
Abbott,
Alfred, P.O. Box 10205, Albuquerque, NM 87184
Colin
Riley McMillan Ex-Chairman
& CEO Permian
Exploration Corp.
Altomare,
Gasper R., 600 Amherst Dr., SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106
Papich,
Sam J., 4908 General Hodges NE, Albuquerque, NM 87111
Mastrovito,
James, 7120 Aztec Rd., NE., Albuquerque, NM 87110
Putman,
Forrest S., 8808 Chambers Pl.NE, Albuquerque, NM 87111
Richardson,
William N., 3901 Indian School Rd NE, No C-206, Albuquerque, NM
87110
Lupsha,
Peter, 617 Dartmouth NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106
New
York
·
Albany
Chapter
·
Buffalo
Chapter
·
Hudson
Valley Chapter
·
Long
Island Chapter
·
New
York Chapter
·
Rochester
Chapter
Jeffrey
Ballabon Vice
President of Publicity Primedia
H.
Doug Barclay Attorney
Hiscock & Barclay
Bruce
A. Blakeman Attorney Robert Blakeman Associates
Geoffrey
T. Boisi Vice Chairman JPMorgan
Mark
Broxmeyer President
& CEO Fairfield Properties
James
E. Cayne Chairman & CEO Bear Stearns & Co.
Francois
de Saint Phalle U.S.
Equities Co-head Warburg Dillon Read
Bruce
S. Gelb Vice Chairman Bristol-Myers Squibb
Rich
L. Gelfond Co-CEO
IMAX Corp
Joseph
J. Grano Chairman & CEO UBS Wealth Management USA
Douglas
R. Korn Senior
Managing Director Bear Stearns & Co.
Henry
Kravis Founding Partner Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts
Stephen
M. Lessing Managing
Director Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
John
Mack CEO
Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.
Hank
McKinnell Chairman
& CEO Pfizer
Peter
J. Murphy Bear
Wagner Specialists CEO Bear Stearns & Co.
Steven
Price CEO LiveWire Corp.
James
Quigley CEO
Deloitte & Touche
Stephen
A. Schwarzman President,
CEO & Co-founder Blackstone Group
Ivan
Seidenberg President & CEO Verizon Communications, Inc.
George
H. Walker IV
Managing Director Goldman Sachs & Co.
Bacot,
John C., Bank of New York Co., New York, NY
North
Carolina
·
Charlotte
Chapter
www.ncinfragard.org
·
Eastern
Carolina Chapter
www.ecinfragard.org
James
P. Cain Lobbyist
Kilpatrick Stockton
James
B. Culbertson Founder
& President Financial Computing, Inc.
James
H. Hance Jr.
Vice Chairman Bank of America
G.
Kennedy Thompson Chairman,
CEO & President Wachovia Corp
Williamson,
Eugene, 1008 Millbrook Dr., Greenville, NC 27858
Maciel,
Joseph, 1992 Jack Rabbit Lane., New Bern, NC 28562
Platt,
Dr.Rorin M., 1512 Oakland Hills Way, Raleigh, NC 27604
North
Dakota
·
North
Dakota Chapter
http://www.infragard-nd.org
Ohio
·
Cincinnati
Chapter
www.infragard.net/chapters/cincinnati
·
Cleveland
Chapter
www.nocinfragard.org
·
Columbus
Chapter
infragard.columbus.oh.us
·
Dayton
Chapter
www.infragard.dayton.oh.us
·
Toledo
Chapter
www.toledoinfragard.org/
Peter
W. Adams Executive
Alliance Capital Management
Anthony
J. Alexander President
FirstEnergy Corp.
William
A. Antonoplos Lobbyist
Antonoplos & Associates
Ron
Beshear Managing Partner Beshear General Agency Northwestern Mutual
Life
Richard
T. Farmer Chairman & Founder Cintas Corporation
Carl
H. Lindner III
Co-President American Financial Group
Carl
H. Lindner Jr.CEO
American Financial Group
Walden
W. O'Dell CEO Diebold Systems
James
E. Rogers Chairman, President & CEO Cinergy Corp.
Oklahoma
·
Oklahoma
City Chapter
Norton,
Maurice, 6453 N. College Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73132
Taylor,
Robert L., P.O. Box 506, Fairfax, OK 74637
Ruth,
Charles P., 3004 Cactus Dr., Edmond, OK 73013
Oregon
·
Portland
Chapter
www.oregoninfragard.org
Stephenson,
John L., 59670 Pheasant Hill Lane, St. Helens, OR 97051
Pennsylvania
·
Harrisburg
Chapter
·
Philadelphia
Chapter
www.infragardphl.org
·
Pittsburgh
Chapter
www.infragard-pittsburgh.org
Carl
M. Buchholz Executive
Partner Blank Rome
Stephen
B. Burke Executive
Vice President Comcast Corp.
Drew
Lewis Chairman
Union Pacific Corp.
TransUnion
Post Office Box 2000 Chester
PA 19022
Peters,
Franklin, 8 Tulip Rd., Holland, PA 18966
Scott,
Alan, P.O. Box 223, Exton, PA 19341
Rhode
Island
o
Rhode
Island Chapter
This
chapter is associated with the Boston chapter
infragard-boston@infragard.org
http://www.infragard-boston.org
o
San
Juan
·
infragard-sanjuan@infragard.org
South
Carolina
·
Columbia
Chapter
Barry
D. Wynn CEO
Colonial Group
Robinson,
Ms. Jeanne S., 1054 Anna Knapp Blvd., 434G Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
South
Dakota
·
infragard-minneapolis@infragard.org
Tennessee
·
Chattanooga
Chapter
infragard-chattanooga@infragard.org
·
Knoxville
Chapter
www.infragard-etn.org/
·
Memphis
Chapter
www.infragardmemphis.org
·
Nashville
Chapter
www.infragard-midtn.org
W.
Andrew Adams President
National Healthcare Corp.
James
A. Haslam II
Chairman & Founder Pilot Corp.
Allen
Morgan Jr.CEO
Morgan Keegan & Co.
Frederick
W. Smith Chairman,
President & CEO FedEx
Garland
'Buddy' S. Williamson Vice
President Worldwide Operations Eastman Chemical
Texas
·
Austin
Chapter
http://infragard-texas.us
·
North
Texas Chapter
·
El
Paso Chapter
www.infragardep.org.
·
Houston
Chapter
www.infragardhouston.org
·
San
Antonio Chapter
www.infragard-sanantonio.org
James
L. Blythe Managing
Partner Blythe-Nelson
Tucker
Bridwell President
Mansefeldt Investment Corp
Robert
H. Brown Jr.
President Frost Securities Inc.
Alan
R. Buckwalter III
Chair of Southwest Region JPMorgan
J.
Fred Bucy Jr.
CEO & President Texas Instruments
Jerry
Bullin President
Bryan Research & Engineering
Lee
Bass President
Bass Family Enterprises
Neil
Bush CEO
Ignite! Inc.
Mr.
Glenn Collins Founder Crystion
Peter
R. Coneway Limited
Partner Goldman Sachs & Co.
Nathan
E. Crain President
ShopOnline
John
F. Davis III
Chairman & CEO Pegasus Systems Inc
John
E. Drury Chairmsn & CEO Waste Management, Inc.
Archie
W. Dunham Chairman
ConocoPhillips
Tom
Frost Jr.
Senior Chairman Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.
R.
David Guerra President International Bank of Commerce
Rolf
Haberecht Chairman & CEO VLSI Packaging Corp.
John
K. Harkins Business
Development Manager Bosch Telecom, Inc.
Jeffrey
M. Heller President
& COO EDS
William
O. Hunt Chairman
Internet America, Inc.
Richard
R. Kilgust Partner
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Experian
PO Box 2002 Allen TX 75013
Utah
·
Salt
Lake City
Chapter
Tim
Bridgewater Managing
Director Interlink
Capital Strategies
Soloranzo,
Alexander M., 5553 West Saguaro Dr., West Jordan, UT 84084
Vermont
·
Vermont
Chapter Website
Rodolphe
M. Vallee Chair
& CEO R.L.
Vallee, Inc
Brumbaugh,
Granville, RR 1, Box 301, Waitsfield, VT 05673
Powers,
Thomas, P.O. Box 35, So.
Royalton, VT 05068
Sims,
William S., 3106 Wake Robin Dr., Shelburn, VT 05482
Newton,
Donald, RR2, Box 343, St. Alabans, VT 05478
Virginia
·
DC
Metro Area
Chapter
·
Norfolk
Chapter
·
Richmond
Chapter
Kirk
Blalock Lobbyist
Fierce Isakowitz & Blalock
Leslie
J. Brorsen Managing Director Government Relations Ernst & Young
Marvin
Pierce Bush Co-Founder
Winston Partners
Peter
Davidson Senior vice president Verizon
Richard
Fink Executive Vice President Koch Industries
W.
Heywood Fralin CEO
Medical Facilities of America
Kevin
Gentry Vice President Strategic Development Koch Charitable
Foundation
Kevin
P. McMahon Vice
President, Government Affairs TRW Automotive
Jeffrey
L. McWaters Chairman
& CEO AMERIGROUP Corp.
Abbott,
Dr. Preston S., 1305 Namassin Rd., Alexandria, VA 22308
Babcock,
James H., 11500 Fairway Dr., No 307, Reston, VA 22090
Adams,
Nathan M., 321 S. Pitt St., Alexandria, VA 22314
Petersen,
George A., P.O. Box 605, Springfield, VA 22150
Washington,
D.C.
·
www.infragardnationscapital.org
Lanny
Griffith Chief
Operating Officer Barbour Griffith & Rogers
Charles
L. Grizzle President
& Chairman Grizzle Co.
James
A. Baker IV
Attorney Baker Botts
J.
Carter Beese President
Riggs Capital Partners
Wayne
Berman Owner
Berman Enterprises, Inc.
David
Carmen President
& CEO Carmen Group
Alfred
W. Cortese Jr.Lobbyist
Cortese, PLLC
Ronald
F. Docksai Vice President Government Relations Bayer Corp
Jack
N. Gerard President
National Mining Association
Bill
Graves President
& CEO American Trucking Association
Mr.
Dirk W. Van Dongen President
National Assoc. of Wholesale Distributors
Jules
Frank Mermoud Senior
Vice President Aegis Communication
W.
Henson Moore President
& CEO American
Forest & Paper Association
Anderegg,
Richard, 103 G St., SW, No. B 203, Washington, DC 20024
Pincus,
Walter, 1150 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20071
Washington
·
Washington
Chapter
www.infragard-wa.org
John
Connors Chief
Financial Officer Microsoft
Frank
Dulcich President
& CEO Pacific Seafood
John
Kelly Attorney
Microsoft
Susan
McCaw President
COM Investments
Wayne
M. Perry CEO
Edge Wireless
Oostmeyer,
Paul A., 305 207th Ave., NE, Redmond, WA 98053
Warner,
Charles J., 4616 Kitsap Way, Bremerton, WA 98312
West
Virginia
·
www.infragard.net/chapters/west_virginia
Smith,
Sheila C, 784 Tuscawilla Hills, Charles Town, WV 25414
Wisconsin
James
R. Klauser State
Government Affairs Director Wisconsin
Electric Corp.
Mark
J. Block President
Telecommunications Group
King,
Daniel P., 5125 N. Cumberland Blvd., Whitefish Bay, WI 53217
Wyoming
·
infragard-dn@fbi.gov
Olson,
James, 311 Crescent Dr., Sheridan, WY 82801
The
Afghan/Iraq Death Toll: January 16
January
15 2010
by
Brian Harring
January
4, 2010
The Department of Defense
announced today the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation
Iraqi Freedom.
Spc.
Brushaun X. Anderson,
20, of Columbus, Ga., died Jan. 1 in Baghdad, Iraq, of wounds
suffered from a non-combat related incident. He was assigned to
the 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team,
10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Fort Drum, N.Y.
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of an airman who was
supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Senior
Airman Bradley R. Smith,
24, of Troy, Ill., died Jan. 3 near Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan,
of wounds sustained while supporting combat operations.
He was assigned to the 10th Air Support Operations Squadron,
Fort Riley, Kan.
January
5, 2010
The Department of Defense announced today the death of three
soldiers who were supporting Operation Enduring Freedom. They
died Jan. 3 in Ashoque, Afghanistan, from wounds suffered when
insurgents attacked their unit with multiple improvised explosives
devices and small arms fire. They were assigned to the 1st
Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th
Infantry Division, Fort Carson, Colo.
Killed were:
Sgt.
Joshua A. Lengstorf,
24, of Yoncalla, Ore.
Spc. Brian R.
Bowman,
24, of Crawfordsville, I
Pvt.
John P. Dion, 19, of Shattuck, Okla.
January 7, 2010
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Spc. David A. Croft Jr.,
22, of Plant City, Fla., died Jan. 5 in Baghdad, of wounds suffered
when insurgents attacked his unit with an improvised explosive
device and small arms fire. He was assigned to the 1st
Squadron, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry
Division, Fort Hood, Texas.
January
11. 2010
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Sgt. 1st Class
Jason O. B. Hickman,
35, of Kingsport, Tenn., died Jan. 7 at Forward Operating Base
Salerno, Afghanistan, of wounds suffered earlier that day at Combat
Outpost Bowri Tana, when enemy forces attacked his unit with an
improvised explosive device and small arms fire. He was
assigned to Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 4th Airborne Brigade
Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, Fort Richardson, Alaska.
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a Marine who was
supporting Operation Enduring Freedom. The initial press release had
anincorrect name due to a clerical error. However, the correct
family was notifiedby Marine Corps officials.
Lance
Cpl. Mark D. Juarez,
23,of San Antonio, Texas, died Jan. 9 while supporting combat
operations in Helmandprovince, Afghanistan. He was assignedto 1st
Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, 3rd Marine Division, III
MarineExpeditionary Force, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii.
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
Marine who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Lance
Cpl. Jacob A. Meinert,
20, of Fort Atkinson, Wis., died Jan. 10 while supporting combat
operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan. He was assigned to 1st
Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, 3rd Marine Division, III Marine
Expeditionary Force, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii.
January
12, 2010
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was
supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Pfc. Michael R. Jarrett,
20, of North Platte, Neb., died Jan. 6 in Balad, Iraq, of injuries
sustained from a non-combat related incident. He was assigned
to the 2nd Battalion, 159th Aviation Regiment, 12th Combat Aviation
Brigade, Illesheim, Germany.
The circumstances surrounding the incident are under investigation.
January 13, 2010
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of three Marines who
were supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
The following Marines died Jan. 11 while supporting combat
operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan:
Staff Sgt. Matthew N. Ingham, 25, of Altoona, Pa.
Cpl. Jamie R. Lowe, 21, of Johnsonville, Ill.
Cpl. Nicholas K. Uzenski, 21, of Tomball, Texas.
Ingham, Lowe and Uzenski were assigned to 3rd Reconnaissance
Battalion, 3rd Marine Division, III Marine Expeditionary Force,
Okinawa, Japan.
January
15, 2010
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Spc. Kyle J. Wright, 22, of Romeoville, Ill., died
Jan. 13 at Kandahar Air Field, Afghanistan, of wounds suffered
earlier that day when enemy forces attacked his vehicle with an
improvised explosive device in Kandahar province.
He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment,
5th Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis,
Wash.
The
Department of Defense announced today the death of a Marine who was
supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Sgt. Christopher R. Hrbek,
25, of Westwood, N.J., died Jan. 14 while supporting combat
operations in Helmand province, Afghanistan.
He was assigned to 3rd Battalion, 10th Marine Regiment, 2nd
Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C.
The Department of Defense announced today the death of a
soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom.
Sgt. Lucas T. Beachnaw,
23, of Lowell, Mich., died Jan. 13 in Darya Ya, Afghanistan, of
wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked his unit using small arms
fire. He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry
Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, Camp Ederle, Italy.
TBRNews Addendum January 18, 2010
U.S.
Military Weapons Inscribed With Secret 'Jesus' Bible Codes
Pentagon
Supplier for Rifle Sights Says It Has 'Always' Added New Testament
References
January
18, 2010
by
Joseph Rhee, Tahman Bradley and Brian Ross
ABC
News
Coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus
Christ are inscribed on high-powered rifle sights provided to the
United States military by a Michigan company, an ABC News
investigation has found.
The sights are used by U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan
and in the training of Iraqi and Afghan soldiers. The maker of the
sights, Trijicon,
has a $660 million multi-year contract to provide up to 800,000
sights to the Marine Corps, and additional contracts to provide
sights to the U.S. Army.
U.S. military rules specifically prohibit the proselytizing
of any religion in Iraq or Afghanistan and were drawn up in order to
prevent criticism that the U.S. was embarked on a religious
"Crusade" in its war against al Qaeda and Iraqi
insurgents.
One of the citations on the gun sights, 2COR4:6, is an
apparent reference to Second Corinthians 4:6 of the New Testament,
which reads: "For God, who commanded the light to shine out of
darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the
knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."
Other references include citations from the books of
Revelation, Matthew and John dealing with Jesus as "the light
of the world." John 8:12, referred to on the gun sights as
JN8:12, reads, "Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness,
but will have the light of life."
Trijicon confirmed to ABCNews.com that it adds the biblical
codes to the sights sold to the U.S. military. Tom Munson, director
of sales and marketing for Trijicon, which is based in Wixom,
Michigan, said the inscriptions "have always been there"
and said there was nothing wrong or illegal with adding them. Munson
said the issue was being raised by a group that is "not
Christian." The company has said the practice began under its
founder, Glyn Bindon, a devout Christian from South Africa who was
killed in a 2003 plane crash.
'It
violates the Constitution'
The
company's vision is described on its
Web site: "Guided by our values, we endeavor to have
our products used wherever precision aiming solutions are required
to protect individual freedom."
"We
believe that America is great when its people are good," says
the Web site. "This goodness has been based on Biblical
standards throughout our history, and we will strive to follow those
morals."
Spokespeople for the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps both said
their services were unaware of the biblical markings. They said
officials were discussing what steps, if any, to take in the wake of
the ABCNews.com report. It is not known how many Trijicon sights are
currently in use by the U.S. military.
The biblical references appear in the same type font and size
as the model numbers on the company's Advanced Combat Optical
Guides, called the ACOG.
A photo on a Department of Defense Web site shows Iraqi
soldiers being trained by U.S. troops with a rifle equipped with the
bible-coded sights.
"It's wrong, it violates the Constitution, it violates a
number of federal laws," said Michael "Mikey"
Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an advocacy
group that seeks to preserve the separation of church and state in
the military.
'Firearms of Jesus Christ'
"It allows the Mujahedeen, the Taliban, al Qaeda and the
insurrectionists and jihadists to claim they're being shot by Jesus
rifles," he said.
Weinstein, an attorney and former Air Force officer, said
many members of his group who currently serve in the military have
complained about the markings on the sights. He also claims they've
told him that commanders have referred to weapons with the sights as
"spiritually transformed firearm[s] of Jesus Christ."
He said coded biblical inscriptions play into the hands of
"those who are calling this a Crusade."
According to a government contracting watchdog group,
fedspending.org, Trijicon had more than $100 million in government
contracts in fiscal year 2008. The Michigan company won a $33
million Pentagon contract in July, 2009 for a new machine gun optic,
according to Defense Industry Daily. The company's earnings from the
U.S. military jumped significantly after 2005, when it won a $660
million long-term contract to supply the Marine Corps with sights.
"This is probably the best example of violation of the
separation of church and state in this country," said
Weinstein. "It's literally pushing fundamentalist Christianity
at the point of a gun against the people that we're fighting. We're
emboldening an enemy."
Satan
Writes a Letter to Pat Robertson
January
16, 2010
by
Satan
Dear Pat Robertson,
I know
that you know that all press is good press, so I appreciate the
shout-out. And you make God look like a big mean bully who kicks
people when they are down, so I'm all over that action. But when you
say that Haiti has made a pact with me, it is totally humiliating. I
may be evil incarnate, but I'm no welcher.
The way you put it, making a deal with me leaves folks
desperate and impoverished. Sure, in the afterlife, but when I
strike bargains with people, they first get something here on earth
— glamour, beauty, talent, wealth, fame, glory, a golden fiddle.
Those Haitians have nothing, and I mean nothing. And that was
before the earthquake. Haven't you seen "Crossroads"? Or
"Damn Yankees"?
If I had a thing going with Haiti, there'd be lots of banks,
skyscrapers, SUVs, exclusive night clubs, Botox — that kind of
thing.
An 80 percent poverty rate is so not my style. Nothing
against it — I'm just saying: Not how I roll.
You're doing great work, Pat, and I don't want to clip your
wings — just, come on, you're making me look bad. And not the good
kind of bad. Keep blaming God. That's working. But leave me out of
it, please. Or we may need to renegotiate your own contract.
Best, Satan
Chinese
economy: Sparks of revival amid the collapse of a Chinese steel town
Half
the steel mills in one of China's key industrial regions have closed
down, with some companies admitting that orders collapsed by as much
as 90pc during the financial crisis.
by
Malcolm Moore in Jiangyin
"Before last August, we were shipping between $30m and
$40m of steel a year to Europe," said Xi Dongqing, the general
manager of Jiangyin Hetai Industrial, a major steelmaker in the
heart of China's factory belt. "Now we only have one-tenth of
the exports we had," he added, glumly.
Mr Xi's plant lies in the coast province of Jiangsu, in the
heart of the Yangtze River Delta. The 110,000 residents of Jiangyin
became some of the richest people in China during the rapid growth
of the past decade.
Their appetite for iron ore helped create the commodities
boom that drove prices sky-high and led to fierce criticism of
China. In its heyday, China produced four times as much steel as
Japan and five times as much as the United States.
The past six months, however, have wiped them out, with half
of the town's 50 steel mills shutting their gates. At Hua Qiang
Steel, one of the largest producers in the region, the plant is
silent and the workers absent. "We have suffered, but we do not
want to talk about it," the manager says, asking not to be
named.
"I do not understand it," said Mr Xi. "We are
being told by our customers in Europe that prices are now even lower
than the cost of us exporting the steel, and that's not including
the freight charges. It is very strange. I think distributors must
be trying to sell off their stocks, raise cash and restart their
businesses. Since the financial crisis started we have lost
$500,000."
He
added: "These days, we do not know what to do. Compared to the
old times we are now watching the television more, reading
newspapers and the internet to try to see what will happen
next."
The mood elsewhere in the once-prosperous town is equally
grim. "The big companies have stopped using subcontractors
because they do not have as many orders," said Zhu Longgao, the
40-year-old owner of Huashi Steel Supplies, a construction materials
store. The government has already said it wants smaller firms to go
out of business, and is only placing orders with larger companies.
Although China is the world's largest steel producer, its production
is spread among tens of thousands of smaller companies, ruling out
efficiency savings.
However, there are already small signs of revival in Jiangyin,
which may in turn send ripples out through the global market. One
Australian iron ore supplier said he felt the worst had past.
"I sense that things have stabilised after several tough months
and they are not as dire as are being reported," he said.
"There are also substantial Chinese investment in iron ore in
Western Australia, and that continued during the downturn,
suggesting they want to control a share of the supply."
Mr
Xi has turned to markets in South American and the Middle East.
"We have made contact through the internet," he said.
"It is just a start, but in the old times we neglected
customers from these regions because it was just too
difficult."
Xi
Jinping, the Chinese vice president who many tip to take over as
leader when Hu Jintao steps down, is currently on a tour of Mexico,
Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil as China tries to drum up trade ties.
Another politburo member, Hui Liangyu, is visiting Argentina,
Ecuador and the Caribbean. Meanwhile, China formally became a member
of the Inter-American Development Bank last month, offering $350
million for financing projects in the region to curry favour.
Then
there is the effect of the £400 billion Chinese fiscal stimulus
plan, which will pour money into construction projects this year,
boosting steel demand. "I believe China now has the highest
steel prices in the world," said Mr Xi. "We have switched
80pc of our production into the domestic market."
Since
China's State Council, the equivalent of the Cabinet, announced a
bail-out plan for the steel industry in January prices have risen to
around Pounds380 a tonne in Beijing, according to Mysteel, an
industry research company. Shares in Baosteel, the country's largest
producer, have also rallied, on predictions that China will consume
490m tonnes of steel this year, up 10pc from last year.
Steel
from Ukraine and Russia is also flowing into China, and shares in
Severstal, Mechel, NLMK and Magnitogorsk have all risen by nearly a
fifth in the past fortnight and India's iron ore mining federation
has announced that it expects iron ore prices to double this year.
Two-thirds of India's iron ore goes to China. Since the end of the
Chinese New Year, the quantity of iron ore entering China's major
ports rose by 7pc.
China's
exports dropped by 17.5pc in value in January, compared to January
last year. Although the timing of the Chinese New Year holiday meant
there were five fewer working days in January, the statistics were
far worse than economists had feared. In terms of value, exports
have nearly halved since last year.
Imports
into China fell by a record 43.1pc in value, although the price of
oil and other commodities may explain part of the drop. Since China
imports many of the raw materials it needs to manufacture goods, the
drop in imports suggests months of weakness ahead.
However,
the fact that China is running a near-record $39.11 billion (£27
billion) trade surplus could lead to further tensions as the spectre
of protectionism looms worldwide.''The numbers are terrible. The
environment is awful,'' said Ken Peng, an economist at Citigroup.
In
Wenzhou, in southern China, exporters said they were fearful for the
rest of the year. At Aolun, one of the China's largest shoe
factories, the workers admitted that orders had halved. "Before
the financial crisis, each production line was making between 50,000
and 60,000 pairs a month," said one worker, who asked not to be
named. "Now we make just 30,000." A spokesman for Aolun
admitted that last year had been "very bad"
Ringed
by mountains but facing the sea, Wenzhou's geography has helped it
become one of China's most outward-looking and entrepreneurial
cities. It was here, in the 1980s, that private companies began to
export their goods and create enormous suburbs of low-cost
factories.
Qiaotou
is button city and produces 60pc of the world's supply. Exports have
crumbled and sales are down 20pc, said Ma Fuquan, the 29-year-old
manager of Zhenghua buttons. Next door, Xindaxin buttons said they
do not have much time left if things continue as they are. "A
lot of the smaller companies have closed," said Mr Ma.
Wenzhou
also manufactures 95pc of the world's cigarette lighters, and Li
Zhongjian, the head of Tung Fong lighters, one of the largest
companies, said he was not surprised by the trade figures.
"Even last year things were pretty bad and people have changed
their mentality from consuming to saving," he said.
"Beforehand, they might have worn three pairs of shoes a year,
or discarded shoes that were barely worn. Now they have cut down.
This will be a big test for all Chinese companies."
However,
several companies said Wenzhou's entrepreneurial spirit would win
through and that China would remain the world's workshop.
"There is nowhere else in the world cheaper to make
things," said Chen Ji, the owner of New Urban Buttons.
"Even if you move production to Vietnam, you still have to come
back to China for some materials."
"The
financial crisis has had an effect, but most of the factory closures
have been cash flow problems because owners have lost their money on
the stock market or by investing in property," he added.
"The media exaggerated things and banks became reluctant to
give out credit, but we expect to grow this year and are opening a
new branch in Shanghai to sell to H&M and Zara."
Mr
Li, at Tung Fong, added that larger companies had been given "a
great opportunity" to increase market share as smaller
companies went bust. "We are also targeting new markets. We
have developed a special cigarette lighter technology that will help
them work at high altitude, useful for South America," he said.
MAJOR
FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES
Estimated
foreign holdings of U.S. Treasury marketable and non-marketable
bills, bonds, and notes reported under the Treasury International
Capital (TIC) reporting system are based on annual Surveys of
Foreign Holdings of U.S. Securities and on monthly data.
China,
Mainland
744.2 billion $
|