|
Have you seen this
man?

Zev William
Barkan
If you
recognize him, contact the nearest New Zealand consulate or the
American FBI office nearest to you at once.
by Bridget Carter
New Zealand Herald
Police
made a public appeal on national television for a suspected Mossad
spy two days after Israelis were arrested for allegedly trying
to fraudulently obtain a New Zealand passport.
Zev
William Barkan, 37,
appeared on the reality programme Police Ten 7 last month as being wanted
for fraudulently obtaining a New Zealand passport.
The
photo of Barkan used on the programme was the one he submitted for
an urgent passport last month in the name of a wheelchair-bound
cerebral palsy sufferer, "Mr A", who has name suppression.
But
the police now believe the missing man has left the country and
admit they do not know where to find him.
Barkan
had been in and out of the country since November on a US
passport and court documents reveal that he flatted for several
weeks with a woman in Sandringham, stayed with a couple in Mt Eden
and told people he was here to go on a sailing course.
While
in New Zealand he saw a doctor.
People
he stayed with called him Jay. They said he returned late at
night, always ate out and said his family had a doors and windows
business where he lived in Washington DC.
The spies who
stole my name
by Bridget Carver, Eugene Bingham and Phil Taylor
New Zealand Herald
July 3, 2004
An
Auckland family have told how their tetraplegic son's identity was
stolen by an Israeli secret agent who moved in just down the road.
Zev
Barkan, who has fled New Zealand and escaped the justice faced
yesterday by his two co-accused spies, lived within 300m of the man
in whose name he applied for a passport to assume a New Zealand
identity.
"Barkan
lived in the street next door to where [the victim] was
living," said his father, speaking exclusively to the Weekend
Herald.
"He
must have been able to see all these handicapped people going around
in wheelchairs. I don't know if that is relevant or
coincidence."
The
story of the handicapped man caught up in the spy story emerged
yesterday after two men pleaded guilty to a charge of trying to
obtain a false New Zealand passport.
Urie
Kelman and Eli Cara were remanded in custody and will be sentenced
on July 15.
Mystery
still surrounds how the spies selected their victim, who lives in
care.
The
family - whose identity is suppressed - were drawn into the world of
international intrigue when a Department of Internal Affairs
officer, Ian Tingey, rang them in March asking if their son had
applied for a passport and had travel plans.
The
victim, who is his 30s and has cerebral palsy due to brain damage at
birth, is in no state to do either.
"[My
son] is quite intelligent, he just can't speak, can't toilet or feed
himself," said the father. "He is a person in his own
right. He lives in his own world and most of it is in his head - he
can't talk to you and me.
"He
has a fully operational brain - he was writing plays when he was
about 11 or 12."
He
communicates by using a device with a protruding connection which is
attached to his head. He uses it to tap onto a computer pad and can
thereby slowly type.
Mr
Tingey became suspicious about a passport application made in the
victim's name after a phone call from a well-spoken man who claimed
to be the applicant and was seeking to speed up the process.
The
caller faxed through a travel itinerary and ticketing information to
help the process. But Mr Tingey had noted the caller had what he
thought was an underlying Canadian or American accent.
On
March 19, Mr Tingey contacted the victim's father and was told the
applicant could not be his son.
"When
we first heard about it, we thought goodness gracious, how
outrageous," said the father. "How the hell have they got
hold of our details?"
The
victim himself treats it in a minor way, his father said.
When
Barkan applied for the passport, he used the victim's birth
certificate, which had been applied for using the victim's mother's
name.
She
is no longer married to the victim's father and has lived in Britain
for two years working with cerebral palsy victims.
"They
used her married name, which she hasn't used for God knows how long,
and they also used her middle name, which she has never answered
to," said the father. The mother flew out from Britain to see
if she could help with police inquiries, but there was nothing she
could add as to why her son was selected.
"It's
great the police have caught these guys but it still doesn't answer
the questions of how and why they targeted him," said the
father.
When
Internal Affairs informed the police about its suspicions, a covert
operation began.
Detectives
uncovered details of four people, their movements in and out of the
country, where they stayed, cars they rented.
The
men were Kelman, Cara, Barkan and a fourth person, whose identity
police have not discovered.
The
police summary of facts lists the occupations of the three as
unknown, but senior Government figures believe they are agents for
Mossad, Israel's secret service.
The
guilty plea came suddenly, after a fast-tracked depositions hearing
and extraordinary efforts by Kelman to avoid being photographed by
the media.
Kelman
and Cara claimed not to know each other or Barkan but police say
inquiries reveal otherwise.
There
were calls made between cellphones found in the possession of Kelman
and Cara, and keys to a car rented by Barkan were found in Kelman's
possession.
The
defendants have claimed they met Barkan by chance and were merely
good Samaritans helping someone. They initially denied knowing there
was anything illegal in what they or Barkan did.
Soon
after beginning inquiries, police learned that Cara particularly was
a regular visitor to New Zealand, having travelled here 24 times
between October 2000 and March 2004. He used two Israeli passports,
the second a replacement.
Cara
claimed to be a travel agent and to operate a Sydney travel agency.
But inquiries by the Weekend Herald indicate it does not exist - or
if it does, it operated illegally.
Barkan
appears to have come to New Zealand with the purpose of illegally
obtaining a New Zealand passport using an assumed identity.
He
first came here, according to the police summary of facts, in
November 2003, travelling on a United States passport which
identified him as an Israeli.
Later
that month, Barkan visited a doctor's surgery in Lynfield, using the
victim's name.
On
December 3, Barkan left the country. The next day Internal Affairs
received an order for a birth certificate in the victim's name. This
was processed and the certificate sent to the Auckland post office
box number supplied.
Barkan,
Cara and Kelman all travelled in and out of New Zealand during
December, apparently working on the passport scam.
In
March, all three returned to New Zealand. On March 6, Barkan rented
an inner-city apartment on a short-term agreement in St Paul St.
Six
days later he returned to the Lynfield doctor complaining of a minor
ailment. Barkan told GP Keith Way to witness his passport
application, telling him it was needed urgently as he was soon to
marry in Australia. The doctor filled out the form.
On
March 13 an urgent application for a passport was lodged with
Internal Affairs in Wellington. With it was a genuine birth
certificate and a passport-sized photograph of Barkan. Cara left New
Zealand that day. Barkan left a week later.
Kelman
stayed in Auckland, where on a Kiwi International Hotel registration
form he entered the same vehicle which records indicate was rented
to Barkan. This was March 21, the day police began their sting.
Cara
and Kelman were arrested on March 23, after plainclothes police
watched as the passport was delivered. According to the police
summary, the day began with a male caller refusing to pick up the
passport in person and requesting it be delivered to Travcour, a
Queen St company specialising in travel documentation. Undercover
police made the delivery.
About
1.25pm Travcour received a telephone request from a male caller that
the package containing the passport be couriered to the St Paul's
address at which Barkan had rented an apartment earlier in the
month.
Undercover
police again made the delivery. The apartment manager told them that
an ex-tenant (Barkan) had phoned requesting permission for a package
to be delivered to the office and asking that he be phoned when it
arrived.
A
detective noticed a person - whom he later identified as Cara - at a
cafe across the road monitoring movements. About 2.35pm the manager
was contacted. He confirmed the package had arrived. The caller told
him a taxi would pick it up. At 2.38pm a call was made from Cara's
phone to one used by Barkan.
An
alert taxi arrived at 3pm and, watched by Cara, the driver picked up
the package. The taxi driver was told to go to a Freemans Bay
location.
There
Kelman was waiting.
"On
seeing plainclothes police, Kelman hid his cellphone in bushes then
walked swiftly from his observation area," a prosecutor told
the court. Soon after, Kelman's phone began to ring. A policeman
retrieved it and answered it. It was the taxi driver saying he had
arrived.
A
former Mossad spy living in New Zealand has said he suspects the
agency is behind the scam.
He
said New Zealand passports were prized by spy agencies, particularly
Israel's, because they didn't arouse the suspicion of border
officials, particularly in the Arab world which regarded the New
Zealand as sympathetic to Palestinians.
If the men were Mossad, he said, it was unlikely
to be the first time the spy agency had tried to get New Zealand
passports.
The Mossad Penetrates US Intelligence Communications
How Israeli Intelligence can tap into any American telephone…and get
away with it
Los
Angeles, 1997, a major local, state and federal drug investigating
sours. The suspects: Israeli organized crime with
operations in New York, Miami, Las Vegas, Canada, Israel and Egypt.
The allegations: cocaine and ecstasy trafficking, and sophisticated
white-collar credit card and computer fraud.
The
problem: according to classified law enforcement documents obtained
by Fox News, the bad guys had the cops’ beepers, cell phones, even
home phones under surveillance. Some who did get caught
admitted to having hundreds of numbers and using them to avoid
arrest.
"This
compromised law enforcement communications between LAPD detectives
and other assigned law enforcement officers working various aspects
of the case. The organization discovered communications
between organized crime intelligence division detectives, the FBI
and the Secret Service."
Shock
spread from the DEA to the FBI in Washington, and then the CIA.
An investigation of the problem, according to law enforcement
documents, concluded, "The organization has apparent extensive
access to database systems to identify pertinent personal and
biographical information."
When
investigators tried to find out where the information might have
come from, they looked at Amdocs, a publicly traded firm
based in Israel. Amdocs generates billing data
for virtually every call in America, and they do credit checks.
The company denies any leaks, but investigators still fear that the
firm's data is getting into the wrong hands.
When
investigators checked their own wiretapping system for leaks, they
grew concerned about potential vulnerabilities in the computers that
intercept, record and store the wiretapped calls. A main
contractor is Comverse Infosys, which works closely with the
Israeli government, and under a special grant program, is reimbursed
for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by
Israel's Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Some
American terrorist investigators fear certain suspects in the Sept.
11 attacks may have managed to stay ahead of them, by knowing who
and when investigators are calling on the telephone. How?
By
obtaining and analyzing data that's generated every time someone in
the U.S. makes a call.
Here's
how the system works. Most directory assistance calls, and virtually
all call records and billing in the U.S. are done for the phone
companies by Amdocs Ltd., an Israeli-based private
elecommunications company.
Amdocs
has contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America, and
more worldwide. The White House and other secure government
phone lines are protected, but it is virtually impossible to make a
call on normal phones without generating an Amdocs record of
it.
In
recent years, the FBI and other government agencies have
investigated Amdocs more than once. The firm has
repeatedly and adamantly denied any security breaches or wrongdoing.
In 1999, the super secret national security agency, headquartered in
northern Maryland, issued what's called a Top Secret sensitive
compartmentalized information report, TS/SCI, warning that records
of calls in the United States were getting into foreign hands – in
Israel, in particular.
Investigators
don't believe calls are being listened to, but the data about who is
calling whom and when is plenty valuable in itself. An
internal Amdocs memo to senior company executives suggests
just how Amdocs generated call records could be used.
“Widespread data mining techniques and algorithms.... combining
both the properties of the customer (e.g., credit rating) and
properties of the specific ‘behavior….’” Specific behavior,
such as who the customers are calling.
The
Amdocs memo says the system should be used to prevent phone
fraud. But U.S. counterintelligence analysts say it
could also be used to spy through the phone system. The N.S.A
has held numerous classified conferences to warn the F.B.I. and
C.I.A. how Amdocs records could be used. At one NSA
briefing, a diagram by the Argon national lab was used to show that
if the phone records are not secure, major security breaches are
possible.
Another
briefing document said, "It has become increasingly apparent
that systems and networks are vulnerable.…Such crimes always
involve unauthorized persons, or persons who exceed their
authorization...citing on exploitable vulnerabilities."
Those
vulnerabilities are growing, because according to another briefing,
the U.S. relies too much on foreign companies like Amdocs for
high-tech equipment and software. "Many factors have led
to increased dependence on code developed overseas.... We buy rather
than train or develop solutions."
U.S.
intelligence does not believe the Israeli government is involved in
a misuse of information, and Amdocs insists that its data is
secure. What U.S. government officials are worried about, however,
is the possibility that Amdocs data could get into the wrong
hands, particularly organized crime. And that would not be the
first thing that such a thing has happened. As a case in
point, in a 1997 drug trafficking case in Los Angeles, in which
telephone information, the type that Amdocs collects, was
used to "completely compromise the communications of the FBI,
the Secret Service, the DEO and the LAPD."
There
was a report, you'll recall, that the Mossad, the Israeli
intelligence agency, did indeed send representatives to the U.S. to
warn, just before 9/11, that a major terrorist attack was imminent.
How does that leave room for the lack of a warning?
What
investigators are saying is that that warning from the Mossad
was nonspecific and general, and they believe that it may have had
something to do with the desire to protect what are called sources
and methods in the intelligence community. The suspicion
being, perhaps those sources and methods were taking place right
here in the United States.
An
Israeli-based company called Amdocs Ltd. that generates the
computerized records and billing data for nearly every phone call
made in America. U.S. investigators digging into the 9/11
terrorist attacks fear that suspects may have been tipped off to
what they were doing by information leaking out of Amdocs.
The
concern about phone security extends to another company, founded in
Israel, that provides the technology that the U.S. government uses
for electronic eavesdropping.
The
company is Comverse Infosys, a subsidiary of an Israeli-run
private telecommunications firm, with offices throughout the U.S.
It provides wiretapping equipment for law enforcement. Here's
how wiretapping works in the U.S.
Every
time you make a call, it passes through the nation's elaborate
network of switchers and routers run by the phone companies.
Custom computers and software, made by companies like Comverse,
are tied into that network to intercept, record and store the
wiretapped calls, and at the same time transmit them to
investigators.
The
manufacturers have continuing access to the computers so they can
service them and keep them free of glitches. This process was
authorized by the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement
Act, or CALEA. While CALEA made wiretapping easier, it
has led to a system that is seriously vulnerable to compromise, and
may have undermined the whole wiretapping system.
Attorney
General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller were both
warned Oct. 18 in a hand-delivered letter from 15 local, state and
federal law enforcement officials, who complained that
"law enforcement's current electronic surveillance
capabilities are less effective today than they were at the
time CALEA was enacted."
Congress
insists the equipment it installs is secure. But the complaint
about this system is that the wiretap computer programs made by
Comverse have, in effect, a back door through which wiretaps
themselves can be intercepted by unauthorized parties.
Adding
to the suspicions is the fact that in Israel, Comverse works closely
with the Israeli government, and under special programs, gets
reimbursed for up to 50 percent of its research and development
costs by the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. But
investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox
News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse
is considered career suicide.
Eyes And Ears
Of The Nation - US Hires Morons As Spies
by: Amanda Ripley
Time Magazine
June 27, 2004
Thousands
of truckers, bus drivers and rest-stop workers are being enlisted to
spot terrorists. Is this comforting news?
On.a
blazing hot morning last week, 75 men and women of the highway —
bus drivers,truckers and van operators — convened at a nondescript
office building in Little Rock, Ark., to be trained as terrorist
hunters. The Department of Homeland Security this year gave $19.3
million to the American Trucking Associations, which is based in
Alexandria, Va., to recruit a volunteer "army" called
Highway Watch. So far, 10,000 truckers have signed on to become
amateur sleuths. Over the next year, the goal is to add tollbooth
workers, rest-stop employees and construction crews, creating a
corps of 400,000 people drawn from every state.
Waiting
for the training to begin, Jo Anna Cartwright, who manages the rural
public bus system in northern Arkansas, said she had not yet
encountered any terrorists in her job, as far as she knew. "We
got a terroristic phone call the other day," she said,
"but it turned out it was just the boyfriend of an
employee." Her bus drivers pay special attention to a gentleman
from Afghanistan who recently married a regular rider, she said.
Cartwright had come to the training to learn what else she could do.
The
tutorial was led by Jeffrey Beatty, a security consultant, formerly
of the FBI and CIA. He started by showing clips of alQaeda training
videos. "They are out there training for operations in the U.S.
homeland. Make no mistake about it," he said, warning that
Little Rock cannot afford to be complacent. "You're getting a
presidential library here — for a President who launched cruise
missiles against al-Qaeda," Beatty said, referring to Bill
Clinton. There are not enough police and federal agents to protect
all of America, but transportation workers could be a "force
multiplier," he said. "We want to turn the hunters into
the hunted," he intoned for the first of four times that day.
So
how exactly does one spot a terrorist on the highway? Members of
Highway Watch are given a secret toll-free number to report any
suspicious behavior — people taking pictures of bridges, for
example, or passengers handling heavy backpacks with unusual care.
"We want to hear from you when something just doesn't look
right," Beatty said. "Say you're out at a truck stop and
you see someone hanging out near your truck, wearing a jacket. Maybe
it's too hot out for a jacket. Go back inside, alert someone and
check him out through the window."
But
— and this is important — Highway Watch members are just
messengers, not superheroes, Beatty said. The hotline call center in
Kentucky logs the information it receives in a database and contacts
law enforcement when necessary. It usually isn't. Of the 200 or so
calls that come in each month, only about 10 have anything to do
with suspected terrorism. Most callers report abandoned vehicles,
stranded motorists or roadway hazards. Highway Watch members are
instructed to look for certain kinds of behavior — not certain
kinds of people. "Profiling is bad. Bad, bad, bad," Beatty
said.
Still,
listening to his ominous warnings and the bravado that comes easily
to the former Delta Force commander, one has no difficulty imagining
an empowered civilian getting carried away. And Americans generally
have not reacted well to institutionalized nosiness. In 2002 the
Justice Department proposed something called Operation TIPS, which
would have encouraged not just truckers but also cable installers
and mail carriers, among others, to report suspicious behavior. But
before the program could begin, it was buried in opposition from the
left and the right. Americans did not want to become a "nation
of snitches," as the libertarian Cato Institute put it.
Highway
Watch, which will receive an additional $22 million next year,
preserves the part of TIPS concerned with monitoring behavior in
public space. The Department of Homeland Security has also launched
Port Watch, River Watch and Transit Watch. Then there are the
familiar Neighborhood Watch groups, many of which have expanded
their missions to include homeland security. In New York City,
government outsourcing of surveillance has even trickled down to
doormen and building superintendents, thousands of whom are being
trained to watch out for strange trucks parked near buildings and
tenants who move in without furniture.
After
the session in Little Rock, two newly initiated Highway Watch
members sat down for the catered barbecue lunch. The truckers, who
haul hazardous material across 48 states, explained how easy it is
to spot "Islamics" on the road: just look for their
turbans. Quite a few of them are truck drivers, says William
Westfall of Van Buren, Ark. "I'll be honest. They know they're
not welcome at truck stops. There's still a lot of animosity toward
Islamics." Eddie Dean of Fort Smith, Ark., also has little
doubt about his ability to identify Muslims: "You can tell
where they're from. You can hear their accents. They're not real
clean people."
That
kind of prejudice is hard to undo, but it's a shame Beatty's slide
show did not mention that in the U.S., it's almost always Sikhs who
wear turbans, not Muslims. Last year a Sikh truck driver who was
wearing a turban was shot twice while standing near his tractor
trailer in Phoenix, Ariz. He survived the attack, which police are
investigating as a hate crime.
The
Highway Watch website boasts that the program is open to "an
elite core sic
of truck drivers" who must have clean driving and employment
records. In fact, their records are not vetted by the American
Trucking Associations. At the Little Rock event, some came in off
the street without preregistering. However, the organization is
highly security conscious about other parts of its operations. It
refuses to disclose the exact location of its hotline call center or
the number of operators working there. "It could be
infiltrated," says Dawn Apple, Highway Watch's director of
training and recruitment.
What's
clear is that Highway Watch is a morale booster for drivers. "I
don't want to sound too hokey, but truck drivers are a very
patriotic bunch," says Mike Russell, a spokesman for the
organization. "It made sense for us to take advantage of what
we do every day — which is, basically, patrol major highways
through a windshield."
Just
three days after his training in Little Rock, veteran Wal-Mart truck
driver Danny Ewell found cause to call Highway Watch. On Father's
Day, as he was leaving a Red Lobster in Johnson City, Tenn., he saw
a young man walking between two cars with an orange T shirt draped
over his arm. Peeking out from under the T shirt was a semiautomatic
weapon. "Because of the training, I knew to look at his height
and his hair color, and I got the make and plates of his car,"
Ewell says. "Normally I would have just looked at his clothes.
But now I know to look for things that won't change." Ewell
called 911 and Highway Watch. Local police responded but were unable
to find the man. Ewell, at least, had done his part.
Comment:
It is comforting to realize that our security is in the hands of
such dedicated
professionals. Governor Ridge’s men will no doubt soon
be receiving clown suits to set them off from the other
shelter occupants.
'Boston
Phoenix' IDs 'Anonymous' CIA Officer
by E&P Staff
June 30, 2004
NEW
YORK The active U.S. intelligence officer known only as
"Anonymous," who has gained world renown this month as
author of an upcoming book called "Imperial Hubris," is
actually named Michael Scheuer, according to an article in the
Boston Phoenix today by Jason Vest.
Speculation
about his identity has run rampant since a June 23 article in The
New York Times discussed the book and the background of the author.
The book, "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on
Terror," asserts, among other things, that Osama bin Laden is
not on the run and that the invasion of Iraq has not made the United
States safer.
In
that June 23 piece, the Times identified Anonymous as a 22-year CIA
veteran who ran the Counterterrorist Center's bin Laden station from
1996 to 1999, adding that a "senior intelligence official"
held that revealing the man's full name "could make him a
target of Al Qaeda." Anonymous has appeared in brief television
interviews always in silhouette.
According
to Vest, "Nearly a dozen intelligence-community sources,
however, say Anonymous is Michael Scheuer -- and that his forced
anonymity is both unprecedented and telling in the context of CIA
history and modern politics."
Vest
in his article notes that "at issue here is not just the book's
content, but why Anonymous is anonymous. After all, as the Times and
others have reported, his situation is nothing like that of Valerie
Plame, a covert operative whose ability to work active overseas
cases was undermined when someone in the White House blew her cover
to journalist Robert Novak in an apparent payback for an
inconvenient weapons-of-mass-destruction intelligence report by her
husband, Joseph Wilson. Anonymous, on the other hand, is, by the
CIA's own admission, a Langley, Va.-bound analyst whose identity has
never required secrecy.
"A
Phoenix investigation has discovered that Anonymous does not, in
fact, want to be anonymous at all -- and that his anonymity is
neither enforced nor voluntarily assumed out of fear for his safety,
but rather compelled by an arcane set of classified regulations that
are arguably being abused in an attempt to spare the CIA possible
political inconvenience. In the Phoenix's view, continued deference
by the press to a bogus and unwanted standard of secrecy essentially
amounts to colluding with the CIA in muzzling a civil servant -- a
standard made more ridiculous by the ubiquity of Anonymous's name in
both intelligence and journalistic circles."
When
asked to confirm or deny his identity in an interview with the
Phoenix, Anonymous declined to do either, explaining, "I've
given my word I'm not going to tell anyone who I am, as the
organization that employs me has bound me by my word."
Jonathan
Turley, a national-security-law expert at George Washington
University Law School, told Vest, "The requirement that someone
publish anonymously is rare, almost unheard-of, particularly if the
person is not in a covert position. It seems pretty obvious that the
requirement he remain anonymous is motivated solely by political
concerns, and ones that have more to do with the CIA."
The
CIA did not respond to a call from the Phoenix, and declined to
comment on the book or the author to the Associated Press last
Friday.
Vest says that the man he identifies as Scheuer
told him, "I suppose there might be a knucklehead out there
somewhere who might take offense and do something, but anonymity
isn't something I asked for, and not for that reason; it makes me
sound like I'm hiding behind something, and I personally dislike
thinking that anyone thinks I'm a coward."
|