TBR News October 30, 2016

Oct 30 2016

A Compendium of Various Official Lies, Business Scandals, Small Murders, Frauds, and Other Gross Defects of Our Current Political, Business and Religious Moral Lepers.

“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.”- Napoleon Bonaparte, 1815


“Corrupted by wealth and power, your government is like a restaurant with only one dish. They’ve got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side. But no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen”. – Huey Long


“I fired [General MacArthur] because he wouldn’t respect the authority of the President. That’s the answer to that. I didn’t fire him because he was a dumb son of a bitch, although he was, but that’s not against the law for generals. If it was, half to three-quarters of them would be in jail “- Harry S Truman


“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” -Thomas Jefferson.


“Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage”

– H.L. Mencken


 “For a quarter of a century the CIA has been repeatedly wrong about every major political and economic question entrusted to its analysis.” 

-Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

The New York Times, 1991.


Don’t tell a lie! Some men I’ve known
Commit the most appalling acts,
Because they happen to be prone
To an economy of facts;
And if to lie is bad, no doubt
’Tis even worse to get found out!


My children, never, never steal!
To know their offspring is a thief
Will often make a father feel
Annoyed and cause a mother grief;
So never steal, but, when you do,
Be sure there’s no one watching you.


The Wicked flourish like the bay,
At Cards or Love they always win,
Good Fortune dogs their steps all day,
They fatten while the Good grow thin.
The Righteous Man has much to bear;

                              The Bad becomes a Bullionaire!

 The Voice of the White House  

Washington, D.C.  October 30, 2016:” In the event she wins the White House, HIllary has already chosen the band music and the musicians she wants at the Inauguration Ceremony.

The band, composed of weight-lifting and tattooed bull dykes, is called ‘Clit-Flipper’ and they are famous for their piece, ‘Strap-On Madness’ which was a huge hit at the Democratic National Convention this year.

Hillary plans to wear all leather at the ceremony and will be displaying her husband in a cage.

Hillary had heard that because of unseasonable high water in Holland, there was an article in the Washington Post titled, ‘Dikes Threatened in Holland’ and Hillary vowed military retaliation if she became President.

She also plans to send a collection of Bonwit-Teller ladies undergarments to Bibi Netanyahu  in memory of the days when fellow cross-dresser Bibi used to model ladies underwear while resident in Philadelphia.

The California motorcycle group, ‘Dykes on Bikes’ is also slated to take part in the Inauguration ceremonies, promising to run over any males who should try to jay walk as they are roaring down the road, muscles flexing, tattoos gleaming while giving the finger to the crowds on the sidewalks.”

The strange tale of a ‘dating site’s’ attacks on WikiLeaks founder Assange

October 28, 2016

by Tim Johnson


WASHINGTON  — For an online dating site, toddandclare.com seems really good at cloak-and-dagger stuff. Disconnected phones. Mystery websites. Actions that ricochet around the globe.

But the attention grabber is the Houston-based company’s target: Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, whose steady dumps of leaked emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign have given supporters of Donald Trump the only cheering news of the last few weeks.

In some ways, toddandclare.com’s campaign against Assange is as revelatory as the leaked emails themselves, illustrating the powerful, sometimes unseen, forces that oppose WikiLeaks.

Whoever is behind the dating site has marshaled significant resources to target Assange, enough to gain entry into a United Nations body, operate in countries in Europe, North America and the Caribbean, conduct surveillance on Assange’s lawyer in London, obtain the fax number of Canada’s prime minister and seek to prod a police inquiry in the Bahamas.

And they’ve done it at a time when WikiLeaks has become a routine target of Democratic politicians who portray Assange as a stooge of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his reported efforts to disrupt the U.S. election.

One part of toddandclare’s two-pronged campaign put a megaphone to unproven charges that Assange made contact with a young Canadian girl in the Bahamas through the internet with the intention of molesting her. The second part sought to entangle him in a plan to receive $1 million from the Russian government.

WikiLeaks claims the dating site is “a highly suspicious and likely fabricated” company. In turn, the company lashed out at Assange on Thursday and “his despicable activities against American national security,” and warned journalists to “check with your libel lawyers first before printing anything that could impact or endanger innocent people’s lives.”

So why are the parties to the melee coming out with both barrels blazing? That remains a mystery of the kind that might take a WikiLeaks-style document dump to suss out.

What is beyond dispute, though, is that the attacks on WikiLeaks rose as the group released a first batch of leaked Democratic National Committee emails in July, days before the party’s national convention, and again this month, as WikiLeaks began releasing thousands of emails from the account of John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign chairman.

The online company paints itself as all-American. Online material says its founders, Todd and Clare Hammond, “are an average American couple from Michigan, who met in the eighth grade.” In 2011, the company says, the Christian couple started an email dating service, and “have married 3,000 couples to date.” Their online network began in 2015, and a statement it filed to a U.N. body says it has “100,000+ female singles” in six countries.

The company’s operating address is a warehouse loading dock in Houston. Its mail goes to a Houston drop box. Its phone numbers no longer work. WikiLeaks says Texas officials tell it the entity is not registered there either under toddandclare.com or a parent company, T&C Network Solutions.

The person who responds to email sent to the company declined to identify himself or herself or answer further questions.

“We are not required to confirm the information you are requesting to anyone other than our government and tax authorities. So many people (and companies) have now been unfairly libeled by the wikileaks troll machine, we are being advised not to comment,” an unsigned email from the company to a McClatchy reporter said Thursday morning.

The people behind toddandclare.com persuaded a U.N. body known as the Global Compact to give it status as a participant in May, and it submitted an eight-page report to the U.N. group Oct. 4 carefully laying out its allegations against Assange. The firm was delisted by the U.N. body eight days later amid controversy over its claims.

An Australian lawyer, Melinda Taylor, said the report’s precise language raised additional suspicions at WikiLeaks, where she assists Assange in human rights litigation.

“This is not a report that’s been drafted by a dating agency. It’s highly legalistic and very structured. It’s the language of someone who has drafted complex legal submissions,” she said.

Under Todd Hammond’s name, the report alleged that Assange’s Swedish lawyer had reached out in June to offer Assange’s services on a campaign against rape in exchange for an undisclosed amount of bitcoin. It said the two sides held two videoconferences.

Then came the bombshell: It said the company had ended ties with Assange following “pedophile crimes” he had committed in the Bahamas in late September. It charged that the victim was the 8-year-old daughter of a Canadian couple on a monthlong yachting vacation. The father went to police in Nassau on Sept. 28, the report claimed, charging that his family held video and chat logs showing Assange “internet grooming” the child and “propositioning the 8-year-old juvenile ‘to perform oral and anal sex acts.’ ”

It said Assange, who has been in refuge in Ecuador’s embassy in London since 2012, made a connection to the child’s 22-year-old sister, who was a client of the online dating site, gaining access to the young girl.

An assistant commissioner for the Royal Bahamas Police Force, Stephen Dean, said “there is no investigation” into any such incident and that the police have received no evidence that such an incident occurred.

“We got a phone call of someone giving us some information. But we never had a face-to-face. It could have been a hoax,” Dean said. “We don’t know.”

If someone were in possession of video or chat logs about a pedophile crime, he or she did not provide them to Bahamian police, Dean said, which he said would be odd: “If you have something so significant, I think you’d want to leave a report.”

Assange’s Swedish lawyer, Per Samuelson, wrote to the U.N. body on Oct. 10 alleging that Hammond’s report against Assange was “entirely false” in all its facets and that he had had no contact with the dating site or Hammond.

Even as authorities in the Bahamas dismissed the report, the dating site sent a fax Oct. 17 to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau saying the Canadian family had fled the Bahamas due to “anti-white, racist abuse by Bahamian police.”

“Julian Assange . . . has started a smear campaign to claim our dating company is behind an elaborate scam. It is fully to be expected. Pedophiles are devious and cunning,” the fax said.

The company said it would “continue to protect the family’s identity, until either the (Royal Bahamas Police Force) conduct a proper investigation, or hell freezes over. Whichever comes first.”

The fax was signed, “The Todd and Clare Team,” and left no way to contact the firm.

While the founders of toddandclare.com say they’ve been in the matchmaking business since 2011, their internet presence dates only to September 2015 and really got going only early this year. Those who have done work for the company say they were kept at arm’s length.

A Los Angeles actress, Lexi Graboski, told McClatchy that another company, Fiverr.com, had contacted her in January to appear in a video to explain how to use the toddandclare.com dating website. She said she knew only her contact’s username: NYCPrincess.

By summer, in the run-up to what many expected to be an “October surprise” from WikiLeaks to make an impact on the U.S. election, toddandclare.com began moving against Assange in multiple countries simultaneously. The DNC and a cyber-threat intelligence firm it had hired, CrowdStrike, were already fingering Russia as behind the hacks that would provide the fodder for WikiLeaks. They’d said in June that Russian hackers had access to DNC servers for about a year.

A company representative, identifying herself as Hannah Hammond, emailed Assange’s Swedish and British legal agents offering $1 million for him to appear in a five-minute tongue-in-cheek television advertisement. In a subsequent exchange Sept. 19, the representative wrote that “the source of the $1,000,000 is the Russian government.”

In a curious twist, she offered what she said were three facts about Assange’s London attorney that are “unknown to the public,” including details inside her home and an event in her son’s life, suggesting a capability to conduct surveillance.

Taylor, the Assange lawyer, said the details appeared “to create the impression that the members of his team were under close surveillance and/or to bolster the bona fides of the claim that the offer was linked to a State. Its inclusion does appear quite menacing.”

A lawyer identifying himself only as “James” responded the next day, slamming the offer as an “elaborate scam designed to entrap” Assange and embarrass him for ties to Russia.

The dating site representative sought to pull the veil off “James.”

“Julian: We know it’s you writing. The offer expires at midnight, October 31st 2016,” she wrote back on Sept. 21, according to copies of the emails posted by WikiLeaks on its website.

By early October, toddandclare.com went on the offensive. It filed a civil complaint in a British court against Assange, seeking 295 pounds sterling – about $359 – in damages because it said it could no longer use his services due to the “child sex offenses in Nassau.”

The suit, said Taylor, Assange’s lawyer, “seems to be designed to evade defamation law in the U.K. They’ve put highly noxious information knowing that it would be made public.”

The global tussle between the online dating company and WikiLeaks went public in mid-October when the anti-secrecy group voiced public doubt on whether toddandclare.com actually existed, or served only as a vehicle to attack Assange.

The announcement opened the gates for a disparate crew of internet sleuths – some motivated by hatred of Clinton and others impelled by support for WikiLeaks – to probe into the history of toddandclare.com, suspicious that the dating site might be an undercover operation with links to the Clinton campaign.

Posting their findings on the discussion websites 8chan.net and Reddit.com, they unearthed some curious coincidences. A perusal into the archives of the internet revealed that the Hammonds had once occupied a San Francisco building later rented to a company, Premise Data, whose co-founder has ties to Clinton and her top supporters.

Moreover, a telephone number once registered to a Todd Hammond later was registered to a former Premise employee, Aaron Dunn, although with a different area code.

Premise co-founder David Soloff said such findings could only be coincidences.

“I want reiterate that Premise has no connection with this case. And beyond confirming that Aaron Dunn worked at Premise until 2014, I don’t know the answer to any of your questions,” Soloff wrote in an email.

Whoever is behind the toddandclare.com website came out slashing Thursday, accusing WikiLeaks of “vicious slurs” and saying they were “law-abiding citizens” subject to the “sinister and unlawful behavior of Wikileaks reddit users, calling for people to be harassed and physically hurt.” It acknowledged “disconnecting our phones for the time being.”

“Stay strong everyone,” the message concluded. “Dissent is so important. God bless America, we are truly the greatest nation on Earth. Todd and Clare.”


Comment: The so-called ‘dating website’ of toddandclaire.com has vanished from the Internet. This reeks of the typical underhanded and pseudo-clever behavior of Hillary in many of her past activities. ed

‘Bill & Hillary have the worst judgement’: Close adviser slams Clintons in latest Podesta leaks

October 29, 2016


WikiLeaks has released the 22nd batch of emails from the account of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta.

To date, the whistleblowing site has released 36,190 emails, with around another 14,000 expected before Americans go to the polls on the November 8.

It was revealed in mails released on Friday that Podesta had been warned in March 2016 to change his email password “immediately” as someone had illegitimately attempted to gain access to his account.

In another email from March 2015, on the same day that the right-wing Likud Party, led by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, won a surprise victory in national elections, Clinton adviser Neera Tanden told Podesta that “Israel is depressing.”

The worst judgement

In an email to Podesta in February 2015 titled ‘Brock/Bonner,’ Clinton adviser Neera Tanden includes a link to a Washington Post article about donors delaying their pledges to pro-Clinton Super PACs until she announces her White House bid.

Although not mentioned in the article by name, Tanden describes major donors David Brock and Mary Pat Bonner as “a nightmare.”

“I’ll be telling mary pat later this week that we aren’t renewing her contract – wish me luck,” Tanden adds.

Referencing the article, Tanden also says that sometimes Bill and Hillary Clinton, “have the worst judgement.”

Her candidacy was just not meant to be

A September 2015 email from Hill columnist Brent Budowsky expresses his frustration at Clinton’s speech at a rally in Ohio during which she says she’s “guilty” of being “kinda moderate and center.”

Budowsky features heavily in the Podesta emails, offering advice and working to help the Clinton campaign, but this particular statement from Clinton shocks him. “I tripled fact-checked when I saw this reported on cable because I could not believe my eyes or ears,” he says.

Budowsky worries she will come off as insincere, given her previous statement which she feels could be seen as “insincere tilting left to be followed by a triangulating counter-tilt back the other way.”

“I must tell you, John, when I see things like this, there are moments when I think her candidacy was just not meant to be,” Budowsky says. “I went out on a limb for her today, which very few Democrats who are not paid by her have done recently as visibly and strongly as I did today, and if I knew this kind of thing was coming I would never have done it in a million years.”

Obama’s Citigroup options

In a October 2008 email, Citigroup executive Michael Froman emails Obama to discuss diversity in his cabinet, should he be elected president.

Attached to the email is a “list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, divided between Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant Secretary levels, as well as lists of senior Native Americans, Arab/Muslim Americans and Disabled Americans.”

A second list of women is also included. Peter Rouse, who would become Obama’s counselor and chief of staff, replies in agreement. “This should be a global decision-making process,” Rouse says.

Previous leaked Podesta emails revealed the extent of Citigroup’s influence in choosing Obama’s cabinet. The Citigroup executives were given an “outsized role in shaping and staffing his first term.”

Turkish donations

In August 2015, Podesta forwards an email to finance director Dennis Cheng from Michael Werz from the Center for American Progress.

Werz alerts them of Turkish fundraisers donating to the campaign on behalf of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

“Seems Erdogan faction is making substantial investments in U.S. to counter opposition (CHP, Kurds, Gulenists etc.) outreach to policymakers and USG [United States Government],” he says. “The Erdogan crew also tries to make inroads via donations to Democratic candidates, including yours. Two names that you should be aware of are *Mehmet Celebi* and *Ali Cinar*.”

A CNN source

CNN’s potential impartiality is also exposed through an exchange. Despite maintaining that it’s impartial, an email chain from February 2015 shows Joel Benenson, the chief strategist for the Clinton campaign, forwarding an email from a “CNN source of mine” to a number of campaign staff.

“I think you are going to enjoy a poll we have releasing tomorrow morning,” writes the unnamed CNN source before adding that the poll “asks about 2016ers and whether they are perceived as candidates of the past or candidates of the future.”

Hillary Clinton’s email woes refuse to go away – what does this latest twist mean?

Only 11 days out from the election, the FBI’s director said newly discovered emails – from an investigation into Anthony Weiner – were under review. Will it matter to voters?

October 28, 2016

by Dan Robertson

The Guardian

Washington-Eighteen months and 30 miles away from where Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign began, the issue that has dogged the Democratic candidate from the start caught up with her on Friday, when director James Comey announced the FBI was reviewing newly discovered emails relating to her personal server.

We know from leaked emails that even Clinton’s closest friends thought it was “insane” to secretly communicate via a private computer server while working as secretary of state.

“Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email?” wrote close aide and transition team member Neera Tanden in a July 2015 note recently revealed by WikiLeaks. “And has that person been drawn and quartered? Like [this] whole thing is fucking insane.”

Fortunately for Clinton, in July the FBI eventually decided to let this potentially illegal evasion of security protocol pass with a sharp wrap on the knuckles.

There was an audible intake of breath among campaign followers in the summer, when Comey criticised her for being “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information, but his decision not to recommend criminal charges brought to an end the one threat deemed capable of preventing her from becoming president.

That was, at least, until Comey dropped a fresh bombshell. The three-paragraph letter he released to Congress on Friday revealing the existence of potentially significant new evidence may or not have any legal bearing on whether charges are again possible. It certainly had a political impact.

Clinton was in the air when the letter leaked. An onboard Wi-Fi outage meant she may not have discovered its existence at all until her plane landed in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for a campaign stop just down the road from her very first event as a candidate on 14 April 2015.

There was a long delay in her leaving the plane as aides urgently gathered onboard to discuss the issue. A planned photoshoot with Annie Leibowitz had to be cut short. Her opponent wasted no time pointing out that it is never a good look for a presidential candidate to be under criminal investigation by the FBI.

“Hillary Clinton’s corruption is on a scale we have never seen before,” was Donald Trump’s predictable hyperbole at a rally minutes later in New Hampshire. “We must not let her take her criminal scheme into the Oval Office.”

Democrats rushed to downplay its significance on Friday, as Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, suggested Comey may have been “browbeaten” by aggressive Republicans into announcing a relatively minor wrinkle for the sake of transparency.

The investigation had still not officially been closed, so it is also oversimplifying to say, as many initially did, that it has been “reopened”. The fact that the evidence in question reportedly comes from a separate investigation into a sex scandal engulfing Anthony Weiner, the estranged of husband of Huma Abedin, one of Clinton’s key aides, should make it less relevant to her security case, not more.

But there is little doubt it gives everyone something to talk about in the 11 days left before election day. Unless the FBI moves far faster than is normal to clarify that there is nothing new of significance here, Democrats may also struggle to come up with convincing answers to questions that will undoubtedly weigh on the minds of some voters.

The top 100 most damaging WikiLeaks

October 29, 2016

Hang The Bankers

This list contains titles, links of proof, quotes from the links, and commentary from Reddit.

These are just SOME of the thousands of leaks exposing Hillary Clinton’s corruption, and mainly comprise of the Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails, as well as a few other sources (FBI docs, DNC leaks, etc.)

So much cover-up, media collusion, and pay for play proof was not included, because this list would reach 1,000 if I included them all.

  1. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence)



“Jen you probably have more on this but it looks like POTUS just said he found out HRC was using her personal email when he saw it in the news… we need to clean this up – he has emails from her – they do not say state.gov”

“How is that not classified?” Huma Abedin to FBI when shown email between Clinton & Obama using his pseudonym. Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”

I can’t state how huge this is, it’s a cover up involving the POTUS. There are lots of emails implying this, but this email states it very clearly so anyone can understand.  The email proves obstruction of justice and shows how they lied to the FBI and likely perjury of congress. This at the very least proves intent by her chief of staff.

Obama used executive privilege on their correspondence. We have “Ms. Immunity” Cheryl Mills stating they need to “clean up” the Clinton/Obama e-mails because they lacked state.gov.

Additionally, Obama on video publicly denied knowing about the server. He also claimed on video that he learned about it through the news like everyone else. The corruption goes ALL the way to the top! Flat out lying to the American public.

Paul Combetta was hired to modify the email headers that referred to a VERY VERY VIP individual, i.e; change the name of who it was from. If you read Stonetear/Combetta story, it’s easy to see this is exactly what he was attempting (I am an IT professional). He wanted to change header information on already sent mail to show “state.gov” instead of Hillary’s private email address. Multiple people informed him of the infeasibility (and illegality) of it, so somewhere in the next 6 days it was decided that simply eradicating them was the only option left.

The FBI said they could not find intent of trying to break the law, therefore no recommendation of prosecution.  This email proves, in plain language, that they DID mean to break the law.

This is the real reason why she was never indicted, because she would have taken down Obama with her.

Ask yourselves: why would they both be communicating on a secret server to each other? Why not through normal proper channels? What were they hiding? We may soon find out…

  1. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open trade and open borders”


“My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”

This was stated at one of her $225,000 paid secret speeches to Wall Street that she has tried so desperately to hide… This email contains those speeches.

Borders add safety and sovereignty to a country. Borders helps prevent illegal immigration, which limits crime, drugs, human/sex trafficking across the border and allows more Americans (including African Americans and Latinos) to get jobs. It also costs the working class to pay an exorbitant amount of money. Despite what democrats try to say, borders are not racist. Mexico protects their southern border (with $75 million from Obama) so why can’t we?

During the 3rd debate, Hillary tried to pivot away from this damning topic by stating she only meant energy. Read the quote for yourself, energy is just one aspect of her open borders policy.

  1. Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists




“…the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”

“Clintons should know better than to raise money from folks whose primary concern has been supporting the NIAC, a notorious supporter of the Radical Islamic Mullahs. “The Clinton’s have thrown principle out the window in exchange for cold hard cash…putting money ahead of principle.”

Hillary’s chief of staff admits in the 2nd link that foreign interests sway HRC to do what they want her to do, also admits that the “Friend of Hillary” list is available and rentable to people who want to influence, but that it’s too sensitive to talk in email.

This leak shows Hillary knows Saudis and Qatar are funding ISIS, which is an enemy of the state.  After knowing this, Hillary accepts tens of millions in donations from these terrorist-funding governments (of course they are getting something back in return). She also supported arms deals to them.

Definition of treason according to 18 U.S. Code 2381: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar also throw gay people off of buildings, persecute Christians, Jews, and atheists, and make it legal to rape and beat women under Sharia law. They are the leading funders of Hillary and her campaign through the Clinton Foundation.


  1. Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones


“But If Everybody’s Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”

So she literally just said she lies to the public. This leak is a big one because anything she tells us that she will do can and should be considered a lie.

his was one of her private paid speeches to Wall Street. Behind closed doors she is telling her Wall Street donors one thing, and the American people another thing.  Think about this for a moment…

  1. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies



“Engage immigrant rights organizations. DREAMers have been bird dogging Republican presidential candidates on DACA/DAPA, but they’ve learned to respond. There’s an opportunity to bird dog and record questions about Trump’s comments and connect it to the policy.”

“It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfucker”

“I mean honestly, it is not hard to get some of these ass holes to pop off, it’s a matter of showing up, to want to get into the rally, in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know? You can message to draw them out, and draw them to punch you.”

“Bird-dogging” is a term you probably have never heard before, but we have video evidence of high level Clinton staffers openly talking about it, and boasting about inciting violence at Trump rallies, paying for every “protest”, manipulating Americans through the media to think that Trump is dangerous, and tricking people into thinking Trump supporters are bad.

They laugh about paying off mentally ill and homeless people for years to incite violence against conservatives.  Truly despicable.  And they pretended to be Bernie supporters while they were “protesting”.

They admit to starting the Chicago riot where police were seriously hurt, and admit to shutting down the freeway in Arizona, partnering with Black Lives Matter. We even have proof that Hillary paid people to shut down the Chicago rally.

Inciting a riot is illegal under 18 US Code § 2102.

They also think 50% of people in Iowa and Wisconsin are racists.

Robby Mook, Clinton Campaign Manager, mentions the Priorities SuperPAC in a leak, which is implicated in the video.

There is also proof that the Hillary campaign paid violent protesters who appeared in that video, and Bob Creamer (who was fired) saying the campaign knew about everything.

  1. Hillary’s campaign wants “unaware” and “compliant” citizens


“And as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking – and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.”

The Clinton campaign is literally conspiring to keep the population dumb and unaware (like sheep), and they admitted it! Very scary ‘1984’ level thinking. If Hillary is the right choice for president and the truth is on her side, wouldn’t they encourage her supporters to research, like Trump tells his supporters?

  1. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith


[to be a Catholic is] “an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations”

“…no one knows what the hell they’re talking about.”

“end of a middle ages dictatorship”

Top Clinton aides, John Halpin and Jennifer Palmieri mock Catholics for their faith. They complain about the large number of Catholics in prominent positions.

This was one of the few emails to actually make it to the mainstream media (FOX) and Palmieri when confronted about this revelation didn’t apologize.

Brian Burch, CatholicVote.org president released a statement proclaiming, “Hillary Clinton has already called half of her opponents’ supporters ‘a basket of deplorables’ and ‘irredeemable,’ and now it comes out that her campaign spokeswoman dismissively question[ed] the sincerity of Catholic Americans’ faith. Had Palmieri spoken this way about other groups, she [would be] dismissed. Palmieri must resign immediately or be fired.”

This was why Trump made the Catholic comment at the Al Smith dinner. Hillary has never addressed this nor offered an apology.

  1. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.



“They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee.”

“That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn’t, which will make clear to them that she didn’t have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn’t turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn’t.”

“Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.”

The State Department was:

(1) Coordinating with the Clinton political campaign.

(2) Colluding with the press to spin it positively.

(3) Doing so BEFORE they released it to AN EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. The Clinton campaign was always a step ahead of the committee investigating them. Shameful.

Nick states “Just spoke to State” He goes on to reveal that State colluded with him about which emails are being revealed to committee and that the State plans to plant a story with AP.

Shows intent to withhold emails from the subpoena.

  1. Bribery: King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million to have meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons




“condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.”

“She created this mess and she knows it… HRC said she’s still considering.”

This is AFTER her candidacy announcement!

Super important e-mail in that it demonstrates Hillary’s poor judgement (her idea) in the face of influence money and foreshadows how a Clinton Administration would be indebted to bad actors and criminal regimes.

The “same issues we discussed” mentioned by Robbie Mook in this email is a veiled reference to Morocco’s many human rights abuses.

Her campaign staff is rightly concerned about the optics of the Clinton Foundation/Clinton Global Initiative accepting huge sums of money from a regime that so frequently violates international law and acts in a way that you’d expect the Clinton Foundation to publicly rebuke.

I guess $12 million is just too much money to allow morals, ethics, and the best interests and values of American citizens to intervene.

The Intercept explores how Morocco is exploiting Hillary’s weakness for huge donations, and her desire to be President, to support their own geopolitical interests.

  1. Latinos are “needy”. Latino outreach is “taco bowl engagement”



“Needy Latinos and 1 easy call.”

“Attached is a script for a new video we’d like to use to mop up some more taco bowl engagement, and demonstrate the Trump actually isn’t trying.”

According to them, whites are “deplorables”, blacks are “super predators” who “need to be brought to heel”, and Latinos are “needy” and the “taco bowl engagement”. Hillary is such a uniter!

  1. Clinton campaign in direct communication with DOJ regarding email case


“DOJ folks inform me…”

This report that Clinton’s campaign was in direct communication with the Obama Department of Justice on the email investigation shows a level of collusion which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server.

  1. Acknowledging radical Islam is a real threat and a “serious problem for our future”


“But even if there weren’t violence, the fact that too many who are for subjugation of women, against gays, against Jews and Christians, etc – is a serious problem for our future. Unfortunately, if you sounded progressive in the Middle East/Pakistan, you’d be putting yourself at security risk.”

“I wouldn’t have picked the fight over “radical islam” to begin with. I’m always happy to just concede that it’s a real thing and define it as a marginalized strain, which she did do today. I told Reid this, and I suggest it to you as well: you just don’t want to be on the slippery slope of sounding like an imam who is defining what true islam is… By the way, every time Reid has spoken out in defense of Muslims, it has our most popular messaging of anything we do.”

Her donors, Saudi Arabia, wouldn’t want her telling the truth about radical Islam or Sharia law (a.k.a. murdering gay people, oppressing women, genocide against Christians, etc.) So she doesn’t even say the word publicly.

She has her public position and then her private one here.  Lip service to pander.

  1. Admitting terrorists will infiltrate the Syrian refugee program



“On Syrian refugees, is it enough to call just for vigilant screening? Shouldn’t we call for a thorough review of how we screen to make sure the procedures are actually up to snuff? I think both the CIA/FBI heads have testified and acknowledged that our screening may not deter terrorists. And I don’t think the american people feel like the screening process is adequate.”

“Hillary Clinton Said Jordan Was Threatened Because ‘They Can’t Possibly Vet All Those Refugees So They Don’t Know If, You Know, Jihadists Are Coming In Along With Legitimate Refugees’.”

“We can throw some more shade at the Arabs…”

But we were told that the current screening of immigrants is adequate. That they are ALL peace loving.

Trump says something out in the open (transparent) and gets bashed for it. Democrats think the same but do it behind closed doors.

  1. Bill Clinton receives $1 million “birthday gift” from ISIS-funding Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of 1,482%



“Would like to see WJC “for five minutes” in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.”

Just another examples of breaking the law. Also remember from earlier: Hillary KNEW that Qatar funds ISIS.  Why is the country funding ISIS giving money to Bill and paying for Hillary’s campaign. What are they getting in return?

In accordance with the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, you may not accept anything of value from a foreign government, unless specifically authorized by Congress. This rule applies whether you are on or off duty. Any unit of a foreign government, whether it is national, state, local, or municipal level, is covered. It also applies to gifts from international or multinational organizations comprised of government representatives. It also may apply to gifts of honoraria, travel, or per diem from foreign universities, which are often considered as part of the foreign government. Spouses and dependent children of Federal employees are also banned from accepting gifts from foreign governments.

  1. Hillary campaign prays for shooters in news stories to be white


“Damn… Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”

This was the San Bernardino terrorist.  I’m just blank after reading that. No words. Are these people human, at all?!

Remember the murder of those 9 black churchgoers in South Carolina a couple years ago? The murderer was a White male, therefore the media wouldn’t shut up about it and they still don’t. They feel compelled to mention it in every article. They act like the murderer’s race was the sole impetus for his heinous action.  But when a murderer turns out to be anything but White, and this is especially true of Islamic jihadists, the media immediately clams up about any description of the murderer and begins a lengthy social media campaign shaming people for mentioning the murderer’s race or Islamic beliefs as “Islamophobia”.

  1. Hillary is still privately against gay marriage



“I think everyone agrees we shouldn’t restate her argument. Question is whether she’s going to agree to explicitly disavow it. And I doubt it.”

“I’m not saying double down or ever say it again. I’m just saying that she’s not going to want to say she was wrong about that, given she and her husband believe it and have repeated it many times. Better to reiterate evolution, opposition to DOMA when court considered it, and forward looking stance.”

Here they are discussing old footage of her opposing gay marriage and them trying to figure out how they are going to have Hillary say she’s for gay marriage.

It’s commonly known that she was publicly against gay marriage until 2013 when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of it, then she “evolved”.

This also reiterates the #4 leak that she has public and private positions.

  1. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favoured Hillary)





“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS [DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz] had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they’d either ignored or forgotten to something critical.”

“[Bernie is] someone who has never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do.”

“He isn’t going to be president.”

“[F]or KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”

“If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually.”

These emails were written by several leaders in the DNC. They are not supposed to take sides yet they clearly did months before any votes were cast. After the DNC leaks, their leader Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was fired, but immediately joined the Hillary Clinton campaign… think about that for a second. Remember… Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was placed at the top of the DNC once someone else stepped down, none other than Tim Kaine.  In a later leak, we learn that Tim Kaine was promised VP a year in advance, so the pieces were put in place to get Hillary nominated.

They even tried to attack his belief system. Hillary’s campaign has been helped and manufactured since the very beginning.

Bernie Sanders activist and process server Shawn Lucas served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in a fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters. He was found dead a few weeks later on his bathroom floor. Probably just a coincidence… like Seth Rich and John Ashe.

  1. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (Hillary’s team)




“Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary… We want [Bernie supporters] to go home happy and enthusiastic in working their asses off for Hillary. Why not throw Bernie a bone . . . his people will think they’ve “won” something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn’t make any difference anyway. They win. We don’t lose. Everyone is happy.”

“I am doing the opposite, repeatedly writing friendly and positive pieces about Bernie as an HRC supporter, and when the time is right I will have money in the bank with him and his people as a liberal to urge them to come out in force to vote for HRC.”

“Frankly I thought it was dumb for McCaskill and Gutierrez to be attacking Bernie. We are going to need his voters to turn out in November for HRC, he won’t be nominated.”

“Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina); 4) create a schedule that would allow the later debates to be cancelled if the race is for practical purposes over.”

The person who wrote the superdelegate rules advises Clinton Campaign how to create an illusion that Bernie people won something so they would work their asses off for Hillary. More shocking is the fact that they admit that the superdelegates are undemocratic. This guy flat out admitted that he rigged the system, and is proud of it.

There was also a man who was acting as a mole for Bernie and writing positive/negative things about him then using that reputation to sway Bernie supporters to Hillary.

Lastly, we see how to rig the debate schedule to be more favorable to her. One on one debates would have been better for Bernie Sanders, so they wanted to avoid that at all costs. They also wanted to limit the number of debates, and start them late to minimize the impact of the debates.

Hillary is also on audio calling Bernie supporters “basement dwellers“.

  1. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails (FBI docs)



“[Redacted] indicated he had been contacted by [Kennedy], Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the e-mail’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo,’”

“[REDACTED] believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON e-mails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON,”

A top State Department official offered a “quid pro quo” to an FBI investigator to declassify several emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server in exchange for allowing the bureau to operate in countries where it was banned.

Shows a cavalier attitude towards protecting our nation’s secrets. These are the people Hillary will hire to help run the country.

  1. Hillary was hateful, neglectful, above the law, “contemptuous” to her security detail, and “blatantly disregarded” security, (FBI docs)


https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 43-45)

“CLINTON frequently and “blatantly” disregarded [security and diplomatic protocols].”

“This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol… CLINTON’s protocol breaches were well known throughout Diplomatic Security and were “abundant.””

“…ABEDIN possessed “much more power” over CLINTON’s staff and schedule than other former chiefs of staff… was often responsible for overriding security and diplomatic protocols on behalf of CLINTON.”

“…Clinton disregarded security and diplomatic protocols, occasionally without regard for the safety of her staff and protection detail, in order to gain favorable press.”

“…traveling to Palestine, CLINTON ordered the limousine driver… to open the window while in “occupied territory”, referring to a dangerous area of the West Bank. [He] initially declined to respond to CLINTON’s request; however, repeated demands by CLINTON forced him to open his window despite the danger to himself and the occupants.”

“CLINTON’s treatment of DS agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere… it was difficult to find senior agents willing to work with her.”

Look at the first link (highlights all the parts). Seriously, there are way too many to include in the quotes… just a sheer and UTTER lack of care for protocol, security, and the well being of others.  This is the person who people want to be in charge of national security?

Another scary note in this list is the mention of Huma Abedin, Hillary’s long time assistant, possessing “much more power” and overriding security and protocol on Hillary’s behalf. Abedin has been strongly rumored to be Hillary’s chief of staff should she be elected. She also has strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

  1. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma to keep the price of AIDS drugs high in America


“Since President Clinton’s comments were made, we have been contacted by a number of advocacy groups who are now intending to wage a public campaign to bring in generics and lower drug prices. We do not feel we can participate in this without jeopardizing our work around the world. We cannot oppose what they might do, but we also cannot be publicly supporting it either.”

“we think that publicly pressuring the US and European AIDS drug companies to lower prices and bringing pressure to allow generic AIDS drugs into the United States will have limited if any success and could seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries… We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them”

“We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them and create a slippery slope where prices they negotiate with us for poor countries would inevitably lead to similar prices in rich countries.”

“we suggest that we approach the innovator companies that can currently sell products in the US with the idea of making donations to help clear the ADAP lists.”

“the companies will likely favor a donation approach rather than one that erodes prices across the board. I would guess that they would also likely favor a solution that involved their drugs rather than an approach that allowed generic drugs from India to flood the US market at low prices or one that set a precedent of waiving patent laws on drugs.”

When the Clintons are questioned about the obvious sketchiness of their foundation, they routinely cite AIDS work. But the AIDS work is carried out by CHAI (“Clinton Health Access Initiative”), a separate organization.

CHAI freely admits there is an implicit agreement with the drug companies not to pressure them to lower domestic prices. Bill Clinton made comments that added pressure. CHAI receives a great amount of positive publicity for their AIDS work abroad, and the comments jeopardize that program. Here, CHAI admits it is in their interests for US AIDS drug prices to remain high, so that they can continue getting credit for keeping them low abroad.

But CHAI is not content with simply fleecing American AIDS sufferers. Since CHAI doesn’t want pressure on Pharma companies to linger, they propose to torpedo other AIDS advocacy groups by creating a smaller, watered-down domestic program with the Pharma companies before those other advocacy groups begin their assault in January.

The Clintons are only out for themselves. In comments on World AIDS day in the subsequent years of 2012 and 2013, Bill says nothing whatsoever about domestic drug prices. If AIDS advocacy groups cannot trust the Clintons not to stab them in the back, how can the American people?

Also remember, the Clinton foundation only donates 5.6% of their earnings to charity, despite Hillary lying and saying 90% at the last debate, but she is counting on you to not do research, and her MSM to not report it.

  1. CNN leaked primary debate question to Hillary through head of DNC https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205

“From time to time I get the questions in advance… Here’s one that worries me about HRC [death penalty].”

The question was asked almost verbatim by CNN the next night.

They helped Hillary cheat in a debate. Good chance it happened in other debates including presidential debates..

When confronted by Megyn Kelly, DNC lead Donna Brazile (the one responsible) pivots, dodges, and does everything she can to avoid answering the question. It really is quite embarrassing and cringe-worthy.

  1. Democrats created fake Trump “grope under the meeting table” Craigslist employment ad in May 2016


“Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table.”

“As long as all the offensive shit is verbatim I’m fine with it.”

Childish behavior from the people Hillary wants to help her run the country.  Also references groping, which they are trying so hard (with the media’s help) to push forward.

The reason this is damning is because it shows they were planning this way back in May, these “accusations” are not spontaneous.

  1. Hillary’s camp excited about a black teen’s murder (to help her agenda)


“This is great.”

“Davis was killed by a white man.”

Disgusting. I wish all Americans would see this, the democratic strategists drooling over the opportunity to drive a wedge of racial hatred between the races in America to maximize their political advantage.

  1. Rigging media polls through oversampling




“I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February.”

“so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.”

[For Arizona] “Research, microtargeting & polling projects – Over-sample Hispanics… – Over-sample the Native American population”

[For Florida] “On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.

[For National] “General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions – Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed – Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed”

“The plan includes a possible focus on women, might be something we want to do is over sample if we are worried about a certain g

Democrats have been doing this for years, and this is why you see the skewed polls show Clinton +12 when other more accurate ones show Trump +2. The high Clinton ones oversample democrats by a HUGE margin to get desired results (sometimes 20-40% more), many are created by organizations that donate to Hillary, and some are even conducted by her own SuperPACs!

They do this to make Trump voters feel depressed and not come out to vote if they think he will lose.

Just look at this example in Arizona: Clinton +5, but Democrats were oversampled by 34%! Good lord.

  1. Hillary sends U.S. intelligence and war plans to Podesta’s hacked email



“Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region.”

DEFINITIVE PROOF that Hillary Clinton knowingly violated Title 18 U.S. Code § 798 ‘Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information.’, SHARED war plans directly from US and western Intelligence sources, LINKED TO BENGHAZI.

“It’s unquestionably an OPSEC violation,” Dr. John Schindler, a former NSA analyst and national security expert, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Anyone could easily hack this intelligence information (especially as Podesta’s password was “password”). That is why government personnel, especially the top brass, need to go through proper, secure channels, a.k.a. Government 101.

  1. Hillary took money from foreigners for campaign (illegal)



“Hi all – we do need to make a decision on this ASAP as our friends who happen to be registered with FARA are already donating and raising.”

“I’m ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?…Take the money!!”

“If we do it case by case, then it will be subjective. We would look at who the donor is and what foreign entity they are registered for. In judging whether to take the money, we would consider the relationship between that country and the United States, its relationship to the State Department during Hillary’s time as Secretary, and its relationship, if any, to the Foundation.”

They basically say it will be handled on a case by case basis based partly on their relations with Hillary when she was secretary of state and their interaction with the Foundation.

My God. They were all trying their best to actually follow proper procedures, and Mook/Palmieri just sell “hell with it take the money”. Watching the rule of law disintegrate in front of our eyes.  They know it doesn’t matter anymore.

In the 2nd link, Robbie Mook and Huma Abedin reveal Hillary Clinton was soliciting and receiving donations from actors registered under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) as part of her campaign funding.

  1. Hillary says climate change activists should “get a life”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9617 (in attachments)

“No. I won’t promise that. Get a life, you know.”

Last year, environmentalists probed Hillary Clinton on renouncing fossil fuels, and this is how she responded to them. Yet another example of private vs. public positions on policy.

  1. Hillary is pro-fracking, calls it “a gift”, despite what she publicly says




“I want to defend fracking.”

“I mean, the energy revolution in the United States is just a gift, and we’re able to exploit it and use it and it’s going to make us independent,”

“I would watch our tone and not sound too pro-fracking,” Komar said. “A reluctant tone is a better fit for dem caucus goers (it’s a transition energy. It’s not great but it allows us to get to where we want to be).”

This was in one of her paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, who she will do anything for. Banks, lobbyists, special interests, and the global elite own her.

  1. Referring to a “Shadow Government” that protects Hillary (FBI docs)


https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 56)

“H offers career-enhancing, Seventh Floor

positions in which you can have a direct, substantive

impact in achieving our foreign policy goals”

“there was a powerful group of very high ranking state officials that some referred to as ‘The 7th Floor Group’ or ‘The Shadow Government.’”

Obama slams ‘crazy conspiracy theories’ while FBI’s own docs literally say a “shadow government” protects Hillary.

Obama and Hillary say it is a conspiracy theory to believe in a rigged system… after saying the system is rigged.

They say it is a conspiracy theory to believe in voter and election fraud, yet we have video proof of high level democrats talking about how they commit voter fraud as well as voting machines changing votes from Trump to Hillary (leading to counties admitting to the “errors” and using safer paper ballots), and electronic voting machines owned by companies and elites paying Hillary Clinton money with past ties to election fraud.

  1. List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.



https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23958 (another dinner with 25)


“20 reporters who will closely cover the campaign (aka the bus)”

“Off the record” dinner with 25 press attendees.”

“Hi John – I just wanted to thank you again for your hospitality last night. You were so kind to open your home to us, and the food was as fantastic as promised (everyone at the White House raves about your dinners). I really appreciated the opportunity to connect with a number of folks from Team Clinton. The evening was a great way to kick off this crazy adventure. Thank you, and I hope we’ll cross paths again soon. Best, Colleen Colleen McCain Nelson The Wall Street Journal”

No wonder the MSM has been shilling so hard for Hillary.

First link is the list of media personalities who went to the “off the record” private party in the personal home of John Podesta. Includes many corrupt, in the tank-for-Hillary journalists like John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Maggie Haberman (colluding in other emails with the Hillary campaign) and many others (Diane Sawyer, George Stephanopoulos, Mika Brzezinski, and so many more) . Largest amount of invitees who said yes to the private party are from the NYT, Bloomberg, MSNBC, CNN . Seems to nicely reflect the level of corruption and pro-Hillary bias. This is April 2015 so they were influencing and corrupting journalists for a long time and their investment clearly paid off.

  1. Democrats using American lobbyists to money launder foreign donations illegally


“Take the money!! We’re consistently flagging more FARA registrants daily. In terms of # – we’re at 27 out of 370 prospective bundlers – but to Jesse’s question – that does not represent the costs of how much these folks would likely raise. If we were looking at these folks below on a case by case basis, I’d want to specifically raise: Tony Podesta (Iraq, Azerbaijan, Egypt), Ben Barnes (Libya), John Merrigan (UAE), Wyeth Weidman (Libya), and Mike Driver (UAE connections)…Wyeth Wiedeman Ben Barnes Group National Board for the Following Up and Recovering of the Libyan Looted and Disguised Funds of the Transitional Government of Libya, through Washington African Consulting Group, Inc (12/3/14 – Current).”

It’s too bad the FBI won’t be able to find any intent in these emails… /sarcasm

This picture describes it.

  1. The New York Times is colluding with Hillary, allowed quote edits



“Margaret, far be it from me what the public editor of the NY Times should focus on, but…”

“These exchanges were pretty interesting … would love the option to use… I wanted the option to use all — and you could veto what you didn’t want.”

The Clinton campaign vetoed essentially the entire interview, but even in the portions they did allow for publication, they had Mark Leibovich edit out a mention of Sarah Palin, at Hillary’s personal request.

There are multiple times the NYT has been colluding with Hillary in these leaks, including the fake smears.

This was the article.

  1. Racist remarks about Blacks and Muslims


“…(Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances.”

“…the professional never-do-wells.”

They said most blacks and Muslims will fail no matter the situation. Now imagine if Trump said this.

Remember, Hillary is on video calling black youth “super predators” having “no conscious, no empathy” and that they “need to be brought to heel”.  I’m sure this girl did not find her comments amusing.

This is the same woman who’s mentor was a KKK recruiter, who was endorsed by KKK Grand Dragon William Quigg, who belonged to an ‘Only-Whites’ golf club at the same time Trump was leading the fight to include blacks and Jews into his golfing clubs, and who shamelessly pandered to black people with her hot sauce comment and fake accent.

……..(Note: Some of the redacted material is of such a nature that it cannot be displayed on the Internet. Ed)

  1. Entire “interview” with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes is staged, reading word-for-word


This particular exchange is literally titled “Tax hit on Chris Hayes”…implying doing a tax hit on Sanders on the Chris Hayes Show on MSNBC.

You can literally see them truncating paragraphs into sentences, shortening them, so that they appear to be stream of consciousness thoughts rather than prepared statements.

  1. Hillary Clinton stole furniture from the State Department (FBI docs)

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 44)

“Early in Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, she and her staff were observed removing lamps and furniture from the State Department which were transported to her residence in Washington, DC,”

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return tens of thousands of dollars worth of White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen. The fact that she stole State Department furniture shouldn’t shock anyone. Recurring Hillary Clinton behavior.

  1. Hillary told Tim Kaine back in July 2015 he would be VP



“…HRC has personally told Tim Kaine he’s the veep.”

“Won’t stop assuring Sens Brown and Heitkamp (at dinner now) that HRC has personally told Tim Kaine he’s the veep.”

Kaine says he only knew 48 hours before the announcement.

Solidifies all theories that he dropped out as the DNC chair so Debbie Wasserman-Schultz could replace him (and help ensure she rigged the primary for Hillary against Bernie as evidenced in earlier leaks) and open door for Kaine to be VP.

This is despite her saying he would be a terrible choice for Obama’s VP in her book when she was talking about the last election.  But she needed DWS in charge to ensure she was the nominee.

  1. Hillary tweaks her policies based on donors’ wants


“Raisers are effectively salespeople selling the candidate on the donor marketplace, so their feedback is valuable to HQ in terms of tweaking policy, messaging, tone, etc … big donors usually have ideas/advice and want to feel like they are being heard.”

These leaks prove that Hillary will do anything for money, regardless of morals.  Her staff even comments often about how worrisome it is. She takes money from countries who kills gays, enslave women, and persecute Christians and doesn’t care about any of it. She changes her policies based on who gives her what. She sells U.S. assets to countries who donate… what a mess…

  1. Hillary camp admits it doesn’t support $15 minimum wage


“Substantively, we have not supported $15 – you will get a fair number of liberal economists who will say it will lose jobs.”

Even if they flip-flop and say they will implement it, they still admit that it is bad for the economy according to liberal economists.

  1. Illegally coordinating with Priorities USA, a SuperPAC funded by George Soros


“So afraid that NYT is going with this story on Priorities whether we like it or not. They have sources about the meetings.”

They were scrambling to make sure they were within the law and really worried the donor list was about to come out.

The New York Times spiked the story about the corruption to protect her, shielding the donors which OpenSecrets.org shares with us from a later disclosure.

As you can see clearly there, the top contributor is none other than George Soros with $6 million in. Staff from the two groups met and coordinated efforts, which caused the concern from Hillary’s side because the Priorities people were talking and the media, specifically the New York Times hid this violation of campaign election law.

  1. Racist and sexist remarks: “too white and too male”


“Reed’s lists are still too big, too undifferentiated too white and too male.”

Just because the people being referred to are white and male does not stop it from being racist.  Just replace it with black and female and you can see why.  Race and gender should not be the main determining factor when it comes to administrative positions, only experience and merit, but for Hillary’s staff and democrats race and gender are the determining factors unfortunately.

  1. Podesta illegally has access to top secret information


“Two exceptions–White House requests he can handle by email; if any other emergency request comes up, I can process. I’m holding a TS clearance. Scott, you may need to figure out what we need to do to add me to the review authority.”Why does Podesta have a top secret clearance? He’s not holding a government position…

  1. Podesta connects to unsecure network where anyone could access classified files


“Yes inbox finally opened up. I should never connect to Amtrack wifi. Seems to always screw things up.”

Holds TS clearance, conducts official campaign business on unsecure Amtrak WiFi… These are the people Hillary will trust to secure our secrets once in office. Good God…

  1. Hillary’s speechwriters: “I don’t mind the ‘backs of dead Americans’ because we need a bit of moral outrage.” (Benghazi)


One prominent theme throughout the leaks is that Hillary is just a put together political head piece that is drafted, rewritten, and approved before being sent into public. They note where she should be outraged, they note where she should smile, she even sighed when they told her to sigh. All of the words coming out of her mouth go through weeks of tweaking so that she comes off as likable – and yet she still comes off as a cold.

  1. The AP colluding with the Hillary campaign


“They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it.”

And the AP is supposed to be THE NEUTRAL news source… wow…

  1. Hillary’s camp says she has a “character problem” and is “arrogant”


“I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty). People hate her arrogant, like her down. It’s a sexist context, but I think it’s the truth.”

Her closest confidants admitting what everyone already knows.  She is not genuine.

  1. Staging fake anti-Trump protest, conspiring with Univision CEO


“Thinking about the early 4, there is the Trump International Hotel in Vegas. Maybe there is an organizing opportunity next week. Would be good to reach out to unite here.”

Previous leaks months ago proved many of the “protests” were staged and hired people to be there with professional signs.

The James O’Keefe bombshell video (first one) proves that all these “protests” were staged and they paid mentally ill people to incite violence.

  1. Meeting to go over Cheryl Mills’ testimony


“Please see below for today’s 8am meeting agenda. Also, please note that this meeting should last a full hour” Lists items to talk about “Timing of Focus Groups re Debate Prep” “8/31 Email Release” “Jake/Cheryl Testimony.”

Memo revealing they were discussing the testimony of Cheryl Mills in meetings It must have been highly important to keep all of their stories straight, properly vetted and discussed.

  1. Iran nuclear deal was “greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler”


“This agreement condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf… Yup.”

Top Hillary advisor agrees with that statement, indicating they know the Iran deal was terrible despite what they state publicly (another public vs private position).

  1. Journalist talks strategy with Clinton staff and asks for permission to write article


“am not going to raise this publicly, but one of HRC’s opponents will soon charge that she is running an “imperial campaign.” If it is the right opponent, Democrat or Republican, the charge will resonate.”

“BTW, I may doing an Elizabeth Warren column soon. If I write that my optimum scenario would be for Elizabeth to ultimately give a big endorsement to HRC and give the keynote speech at the Convention, totally off the record, would that give you a problem? It would be my personal opinion only, but if you have a problem with my suggesting this as my idea, I won’t tell anyone and I won’t include it, deferring to you”

Yes. This supposed journalist is discussing strategy with the chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign. Giving him information and warnings about things he learned from other sources most likely off the record. Extreme collusion between the media and Hillary’s staff.

But wait, there is more! He is asking permission from Podesta to write parts of an article. John Podesta responds to the email, and grants permission for the journalist to write the story as originally planned.

  1. Bill Clinton admits Clinton Foundation has no “real projects”


“He also said he’s worried about the pensions commitment and not having real projects to announce at CGI america. I said we are concerned too…”

It was also mentioned that the employees are unhappy.

  1. Violating campaign finance law


“I’m swinging way above my weight class here. And I’m 100% sure this out of protocol. I’m trying to land the campaign a big fat whale that can give between $100,000 to maybe $1 million if their ego can be reassured that they won’t be just treated “just like any other donor. With your permission, can I CC you in an email to these guys. I’m work with Haim Saban’s political director on these same guys. If it’s 100% inappropriate I understand.”

Haim Saiban is the owner of Univision, who has been working with Hillary as revealed throughout the leaks.

  1. Interfering with the 2008 Republican primary process


“Yes, we need to move with some tactics to try to stop him. Ideas? We should take another swing at the immigration angle. I think this is a crisis. We need to ring the alarm bell. But I’m not sure how we could affect the GOP primary? Earned media play on McCain and immigration. Robocalls to suppress his vote? Turnout evangelicals for Huck?”

What right do they have to interfere in another party’s primaries? Not surprised though.

  1. Proof that ‘Correct the Record’ (SuperPAC) is directly coordinating with the Hillary campaign against federal campaign law

https://www.wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/5636 (in attachments)

“In May of 2015, CTR separated from its parent organization, American Bridge, and became its own SuperPAC.  This structure allows CTR to retain its independence but coordinate directly and strategically with the Hillary campaign. This work is necessary now more than ever.”

Correct the Record (CTR) is a group funded by globalist billionaire George Soros to pretend Hillary has support online.  They pay “an army of nerd virgins” (their own words) to create memes and pretend to support Hillary.  On popular internet sites like Reddit, Twitter, and Facebook, they are paid to ‘downvote’ or ‘dislike’ or delete anything pro-Trump/anti-Hillary, and fake-promote anything pro-Hillary/anti-Trump.  Incredibly sad, but Hillary and her “support” is staged in every department.

The same attachment describes everything.

  1. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in direct contact with the Hillary campaign


“[He is] particularly interested in meeting people who could help him understand how to move the needle on the specific public policy issues he cares most about. He wants to meet folks who can inform his understanding about effective political operations to advance public policy goals”

They are basically saying he wants to learn how to bribe people.

Mark Zuckerberg has been very outspoken about Trump and his wall idea, when he himself is building a large wall around his mansion. Guess protecting yourself is OK, but not the American people.

Facebook also manipulates it’s trending stories to not show pro-Trump/anti-Hillary articles or trends, and even censors videos against Hillary.  The censorship is well known and has reduced Facebook’s integrity tenfold. Pro-Trump stories with hundreds of thousands of mentions are deleted to allow room for anti-Trump articles with less than a thousand mentions.  Happens literally daily. Unfortunately this is the case across Twitter, YouTube, Google, and Reddit as well (and why it seems like at times more support Hillary despite Trump getting 30,000 at his rallies and Hillary getting 200).  They are in the tank for Hillary.

  1. Hillary’s team working with hundreds of MSM news pundits

https://www.wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/5636 (in attachments)

“IMPACTING THE DIALOGUE: CTR has identified 372 surrogates including influential and frequent pundits on broadcast and cable news for Presidential 2016 politics and provided them around 80 sets of talking points…”

Once again, shows the media collusion with the Hillary campaign.

  1. Katy Perry is a puppet for Hillary Clinton


“She said no to asking Chelsea. Would go herself before asking her daughter. So we are at plan B: Katy Perry it is.”

Huma Abedin writes that they have to send Katy Perry to do an Arkansas event because Hillary is unwilling to ask her daughter to go. Katy Perry is such a puppet for them that they can use her as a replacement for Chelsea when needed.

  1. Hillary tries to hide her tiny rallies



“Less than 100 people – NO cell phones, NO press. Over 100 people YES cell phones, and ONE print pooler will be escorted in for her remarks only and then escorted out. NO tv cameras.”

“Stories on South Carolina… Including empty seats at event and closed office”

We know Hillary events have small crowds. But now we know many of the Hillary Campaign events were so small that the following policy was proposed.

That’s right folks they are talking about CONFISCATING MOBILE DEVICES, so the embarrassingly small crowds OF UNDER 100 people could never be reported. Complete artificial manufactured reality.

  1. Hillary had a mole working on Biden’s team


“It’s been a little hard for me to play such a role in the Biden demise – and I am definitely dead to them — but I’m glad to be on Team HRC”

Earlier leaks revealed Clinton’s staff had moles on Elizabeth Warren’s team. Seems they had one in Biden’s camp as well. Someone who helped to destroy Biden in return for a position. Ron Klain.

  1. John Oliver caught colluding with Hillary’s campaign




“we’ve made contact with John Olivier”

“and his team is working on it.”

Mr. John “I hate corruption” Oliver doing business with the most corrupt “charity” on the face of the planet? Shocker…

John Oliver works for HBO, HBO is owned by Time Warner, Time Warner donates to Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton owns John Oliver.

  1. Trouble with NBC so they call Chuck Todd to take care of it


“Not sure it will help, but I called Chuck Todd (as head of political unit) to let him know how outrageous and ludicrous this was and that our side of the house is watching to see how NBC handles this.”

Notice how throughout so many of these emails, the Clinton campaign sounds so insufferably whiny.

  1. Politico’s Glenn Thrush colluding with Hillary’s campaign, admits to being a “hack”


“sorry to bother… Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u. Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I fucked up anything”

He sends a huge part of the article to John Podesta. Absolutely disgraceful. Podesta approves the section of course which showed him in a very positive light to begin with.

Don’t worry Glenn Thrush of the Politico. I’m sure Podesta won’t tell anyone you did this.

  1. Hillary finds out more debate questions



“We have gotten intel that Neil Cavuto plans to ask a veterans question of the GOP candidates tonight. As you can guess, the candidates are very likely to attack the Secretary in their answers. Your press team, therefore, may find it useful to get this to reporters”

“Flagging that Bob B. heard that they could ask about carbon tax and late-term abortion restrictions. Solow and I are pulling debate book materials & running abortion answer by Jen & Rachel ahead of 3pm.”

Clinton campaign is getting questions in advance AGAIN for debates. Previously they got a debate question from Donna Brazile. This time it is John Podesta that gets the email from Jon Soltz who somehow learned of a question Cavuto will ask in an upcoming Republican debate. Podesta immediately blasts this out to the whole campaign so they prepare for the fallout.

  1. Hillary wants “successful business people” running for office because “they cannot be bought”


“You know, I would like to see more successful business people run for office. I really would like to see that because I do think, you know, you don’t have to have $30 billion, but you have a certain level of freedom. And there’s that memorable phrase from a former member of the Senate: ‘You can be maybe rented but never bought.’ And I think it’s important to have people with those experiences.”

Admitting Trump can’t be bought.  He has proven that over and over again, while Hillary (as discovered in these leaks) is nothing more than a greedy horsefly mindlessly heading towards the money zapper.

  1. “We are finishing up the next round of TV scripts”


Unclear if it is Hillary who will be scripted or if the MSM will be scripted.  I’m thinking both, as has been proven in the leaks above many times.

  1. Hillary doesn’t write her own tweets, despite claiming “-H” means she does


https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/588513047653801984 (the tweet)


It took 8 hours for over 10 of Hillary Clinton’s staffers to respond to a single tweet by Marco Rubio, which highlights the campaign’s struggle to cover up Hillary’s lack of accomplishments. The email shows the fake persona.

In the 3rd link, John Podesta receives Hillary’s tweets for approval a few days in advance of the tweets going online. Together with previous leaks, it looks like Hillary doesn’t have much input into any of “her” tweets. They are put together by a group of staffers.

  1. On Hillary: “we just keep giving her poll-tested lines that don’t work”


Probably because she can’t deliver the lines without sounding completely insincere.

  1. Hillary extremely weak on topic of standing up to Wall Street


“I believe we started out the campaign about 20 points behind Sanders in Iowa on the question of who would best stand up to Wall Street and that was when we were about 40 points ahead. If you want to make the question of the campaign, who will best stand up to Wall Street, Sanders is the answer and he’ll give you $35 million reasons why.”

Not even her own campaign staff believes she is credible on Wall Street. Even though she told Wall St. to cut it out…

  1. “Even a clown like Ted Cruz” could beat her


“she has huge endemic political weaknesses that she would be wise to rectify…..even a clown like Ted Cruz would be an even money bet to beat and this scares the hell of out me…..”

“WHY AM I NOT FIFTY POINTS AHEAD!?????” Side-note, imagine listening to that for 4 years…/shudders.

  1. ‘The Huffington Post’ colluding with Hillary


“I am committed to make sure she is elected as the next President of United States. I am reaching out to my friends to raise money for her campaign. Please let me know if I can be of any service to you.”

No doubt the entirety of Huffington Post is in it for Hillary when they display their “disclaimer” (“Donald Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe Hitler” or something along these lines) under every “article.”

The author of this email once an “article” on Huffington Post that Trump was “a sorcerer and a wizard”. Yes… Huffington Post published this.  That’s why no one takes The Huffington Post seriously, certainly not as a legitimate news source.

  1. Clinton campaign memorizing their email cover-up script


“Feel free to circulate these. We’ve been circulating this on background as an aide, and the additional points below on deep background.”

This email shows all the talking points her team needs to learn as they will be questioned on her crimes soon.  The notes in here are filled with complete lies however.

  1. Heavy press collusion over Cuba and Hillary’s health


“The print stories on Cuba will largely be pre-written in the morning based on excerpts that we are providing tonight (Dan has gotten HRC signoff on them already for this purpose). The reporters will do some tiddying up of the stories as the speech is delivered/completed, but they will largely be filed as she goes on.”

Blatant. Media. Collusion.

  1. Employment rate – They confirm what Trump says


“Today in America we have economically disappeared, they don’t score in jobs numbers or jobless claims numbers, they are a lost generation within the larger generation, Obama never talks about them because he wants to claim credit for the economy.”

Admitting that the economic numbers they feed the public don’t reflect reality.

Economic opportunity is always the #1 issue; Carville was right about this. Instead of addressing it head on, HRC and team prefer to bury it deeper with tabloid smears.

  1. Obama picked people in his administration from the suggestion list of CiTi bank advisor/Wall St shill


“Barack – Following up on your conversations with John over the weekend, attached are two documents: A list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, divided between Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant Sectetary levels, as well as lists of senior Native Americans, Arab/Muslim Americans and Disabled Americans. We have longer lists, but these are candidates whose names have been recommended by a number of sources for senior level jobs in a potential Administration.”

Froman was a Citigroup Managing director until 2009. He’s now championing the TPP as US trade rep.

We look forward to seeing what leaks come out next as we draw closer to election day on November 8th 2016.


‘Give it a rest’: Social media mocks Senator claiming Russia may be behind new Clinton FBI probe

October 29, 2016


People on social media shamed US Democratic Senator Tom Ryan, who claimed Russia might actually be behind the reopening of Hillary Clintons’ email probe by the FBI over new leaked messages.

On October 28, FBI director James Comey announced that the Bureau has learned of new emails involving Hillary Clinton’s private email server during her time as a Secretary of State. Comey said the agency will “take appropriate investigative steps” and review the new information.

In a CNN interview, US Democratic Senator Tim Ryan alleged Russia may be behind the new leak, causing the probe.

“So the question is: Where did these come from? How did they get to the FBI? Is Russia involved in this? We don’t have a clue where this stuff is coming from,” Ryan said.

The allegation, however, did not sit well with some people on social media.

“This wins brain-dead of the day,” one person said.

Others suggested that the American public already had enough of allegations implying Russia’s meddling into US affairs. “It’s the Russkies! I think Americans have already had enough of this constant Russian-blaming.”

Another person was surprised to find out the comment was in fact not a sarcastic one. “When I first saw this quote, I laughed, thinking it was a funny and sarcastic comment. Turns out this nut is serious!”

“Oh gee whiz- give it a rest,” another tweet said.

American journalist Glen Greenwald, who published a series of reports on US global surveillance programs based on leaks by Edward Snowden, also weighed in on the discussion.

“Need to do a pool to guess which Dem journalist will be the first to find that Comey visited Moscow as a student or once went on RT,” he joked on Twitter.

It’s not the first time Moscow has been linked to potential interference in US internal affairs, including elections.

On October 7, Washington officially accused the Russian government of having “directed” hack attacks against American officials and institutions, though no evidence backing the allegation was presented to the public, with Moscow calling the accusation “nonsense.”

US chose Russia to play ‘bad guy’

Speaking to RT, political scientist and former military officer Brad Cabana said that the Hillary Clinton camp is simply using Russia as a defense tool.

“It’s a continuation of the previous defensive position of the Clinton campaign to essentially blame Russia, cast doubts in the minds of the American public,” Cabana said.

In July, the FBI recommended no charges be brought against Clinton for her handling of classified information as secretary of state, despite stating the Democratic presidential candidate acted in an “extremely careless” way.

Cabana added that this rhetoric is in fact an attempt to distract public attention from the actual information which has been revealed.

“It’s a deflection to cause the American people to focus on the Russian angle as opposed to the content of the emails quite frankly.”

Yet the political analyst noted that there is still “a great thirst” among the public to learn what’s been discovered in the latest batch of Clinton emails.

Fort Russ News Editor-in-Chief Joaquin Flores echoed the thoughts, suggesting that Tim Ryan simply fell for the notorious anti-Russia rhetoric in the US.

“He [Ryan] goes, you know what, it was the Russians. Because this is what he has been told, this is what he’s been hammered into his head. Everything bad about Hillary just aides the Russians,” Flores said

“I do not think he [Ryan] thought that one through. There were no documents.”

However, the absence of any evidence linking Moscow to the FBI decision did not stop Clinton supporter and former Vermont governor Howard Dean from reaching some far-fetched conclusions.

“Ironically Comey put himself on the same side as Putin,” Dean wrote on Twitter.

“Russians are the ones who Americans picked to play the bad guys in movies in politics, in this you know, sort of Cold War scenario that’s re-emerging.” Flores told RT.

That view is shared by political analyst Robin Koerner, who is also an author and the publisher of news service Watching America.

“People say what suits them and suits their side before they get the data right. This is what we’ve been used to in the United States. It’s unfortunate, but it is so,” he told RT.

Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave his own take on the allegation that Moscow is meddling in the US election campaign.

“Does anyone seriously think that Russia can somehow influence the choice of the American people?” Putin wondered during a meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club in Sochi on October 27.

“Is America some sort of banana republic?” he asked rhetorically.

Putin also noted that the ‘Russian card’ is being played by the American “elite” to brush under the carpet real problems the US is now facing.

“It is far better to distract people’s attention to alleged Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so on and so forth,” he said.


Archaeologists cast doubt on ‘oldest’ mention of Jerusalem

October 29, 2016

Agence France Presse

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM: Archaeologists have doubted the authenticity of a seventh century B.C. text that Israel says contains the earliest mention in Hebrew of Jerusalem outside the Bible, a newspaper said Friday. Israel’s antiquities authority unveiled the papyrus Wednesday amid a row with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization over a U.N. resolution on the city of Jerusalem.

A UNESCO resolution this month criticized the Jewish state for restricting access to the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in occupied East Jerusalem, angering Israel which said it denied Judaism’s historical connection.

“How do we know it isn’t a forgery intended for the antiquities market?” an archaeology professor from Bar-Ilan University said in comments published by the daily Haaretz Friday.

Aren Maier Thursday said carbon 14 dating to prove the document’s age was insufficient in view of “well-known cases in which writing was forged on an ancient platform.”

“It’s very possible that only the papyrus itself is ancient,” he said.

Professor Christopher Rollston from George Washington University has also voiced his doubts.

“Ancient papyrus is readily available for purchase online,” he wrote in a blog post Wednesday. “No modern forger worth his or her salt would forge an inscription on modern papyrus.”

But a professor from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem defended the text’s authenticity, saying the words used on the papyrus were very rare.

“If I were a forger, I’d choose a more impressive text,” Shmuel Ahituv said.

The antiquities authority Wednesday said the papyrus, found near the Dead Sea, was seized from traffickers after a lengthy investigation as it was about to go on sale on the black market.

Amir Ganor of Israel’s antiquities authority told AFP Wednesday that it was “the first mention in Hebrew of the city of Jerusalem outside the New Testament,” and proved that “Jews were in this city 2,700 years ago.”

Israel is furious that the UNESCO resolution refers to the holy site in Jerusalem’s Old City only by its Muslim name, Al-Aqsa or Haram al-Sharif.

Jews refer to the site as the Temple Mount.

























No responses yet

Leave a Reply